1,496 research outputs found
Truth Table Invariant Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition by Regular Chains
A new algorithm to compute cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) is
presented, building on two recent advances. Firstly, the output is truth table
invariant (a TTICAD) meaning given formulae have constant truth value on each
cell of the decomposition. Secondly, the computation uses regular chains theory
to first build a cylindrical decomposition of complex space (CCD) incrementally
by polynomial. Significant modification of the regular chains technology was
used to achieve the more sophisticated invariance criteria. Experimental
results on an implementation in the RegularChains Library for Maple verify that
combining these advances gives an algorithm superior to its individual
components and competitive with the state of the art
Choosing a variable ordering for truth-table invariant cylindrical algebraic decomposition by incremental triangular decomposition
Cylindrical algebraic decomposition (CAD) is a key tool for solving problems
in real algebraic geometry and beyond. In recent years a new approach has been
developed, where regular chains technology is used to first build a
decomposition in complex space. We consider the latest variant of this which
builds the complex decomposition incrementally by polynomial and produces CADs
on whose cells a sequence of formulae are truth-invariant. Like all CAD
algorithms the user must provide a variable ordering which can have a profound
impact on the tractability of a problem. We evaluate existing heuristics to
help with the choice for this algorithm, suggest improvements and then derive a
new heuristic more closely aligned with the mechanics of the new algorithm
A "Piano Movers" Problem Reformulated
It has long been known that cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) can
in theory be used for robot motion planning. However, in practice even the
simplest examples can be too complicated to tackle. We consider in detail a
"Piano Mover's Problem" which considers moving an infinitesimally thin piano
(or ladder) through a right-angled corridor.
Producing a CAD for the original formulation of this problem is still
infeasible after 25 years of improvements in both CAD theory and computer
hardware. We review some alternative formulations in the literature which use
differing levels of geometric analysis before input to a CAD algorithm. Simpler
formulations allow CAD to easily address the question of the existence of a
path. We provide a new formulation for which both a CAD can be constructed and
from which an actual path could be determined if one exists, and analyse the
CADs produced using this approach for variations of the problem.
This emphasises the importance of the precise formulation of such problems
for CAD. We analyse the formulations and their CADs considering a variety of
heuristics and general criteria, leading to conclusions about tackling other
problems of this form.Comment: 8 pages. Copyright IEEE 201
Cylindrical Algebraic Sub-Decompositions
Cylindrical algebraic decompositions (CADs) are a key tool in real algebraic
geometry, used primarily for eliminating quantifiers over the reals and
studying semi-algebraic sets. In this paper we introduce cylindrical algebraic
sub-decompositions (sub-CADs), which are subsets of CADs containing all the
information needed to specify a solution for a given problem.
We define two new types of sub-CAD: variety sub-CADs which are those cells in
a CAD lying on a designated variety; and layered sub-CADs which have only those
cells of dimension higher than a specified value. We present algorithms to
produce these and describe how the two approaches may be combined with each
other and the recent theory of truth-table invariant CAD.
We give a complexity analysis showing that these techniques can offer
substantial theoretical savings, which is supported by experimentation using an
implementation in Maple.Comment: 26 page
An implementation of CAD in Maple utilising problem formulation, equational constraints and truth-table invariance
Cylindrical algebraic decomposition (CAD) is an important tool for the
investigation of semi-algebraic sets, with applications within algebraic
geometry and beyond. We recently reported on a new implementation of CAD in
Maple which implemented the original algorithm of Collins and the subsequent
improvement to projection by McCallum. Our implementation was in contrast to
Maple's in-built CAD command, based on a quite separate theory. Although
initially developed as an investigative tool to compare the algorithms, we
found and reported that our code offered functionality not currently available
in any other existing implementations. One particularly important piece of
functionality is the ability to produce order-invariant CADs. This has allowed
us to extend the implementation to produce CADs invariant with respect to
either equational constraints (ECCADs) or the truth-tables of sequences of
formulae (TTICADs). This new functionality is contained in the second release
of our code, along with commands to consider problem formulation which can be a
major factor in the tractability of a CAD. In the report we describe the new
functionality and some theoretical discoveries it prompted. We describe how the
CADs produced using equational constraints are able to take advantage of not
just improved projection but also improvements in the lifting phase. We also
present an extension to the original TTICAD algorithm which increases both the
applicability of TTICAD and its relative benefit over other algorithms. The
code and an introductory Maple worksheet / pdf demonstrating the full
functionality of the package are freely available online.Comment: 12 pages; University of Bath, Dept. Computer Science Technical Report
Series, 2013-02, 201
Recent advances in real geometric reasoning
In the 1930s Tarski showed that real quantifier elimination was possible, and
in 1975 Collins gave a remotely practicable method, albeit with
doubly-exponential complexity, which was later shown to be inherent. We discuss
some of the recent major advances in Collins method: such as an alternative
approach based on passing via the complexes, and advances which come closer to
"solving the question asked" rather than "solving all problems to do with these
polynomials"
Need Polynomial Systems Be Doubly-Exponential?
Polynomial Systems, or at least their algorithms, have the reputation of
being doubly-exponential in the number of variables [Mayr and Mayer, 1982],
[Davenport and Heintz, 1988]. Nevertheless, the Bezout bound tells us that that
number of zeros of a zero-dimensional system is singly-exponential in the
number of variables. How should this contradiction be reconciled?
We first note that [Mayr and Ritscher, 2013] shows that the doubly
exponential nature of Gr\"{o}bner bases is with respect to the dimension of the
ideal, not the number of variables. This inspires us to consider what can be
done for Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition which produces a
doubly-exponential number of polynomials of doubly-exponential degree.
We review work from ISSAC 2015 which showed the number of polynomials could
be restricted to doubly-exponential in the (complex) dimension using McCallum's
theory of reduced projection in the presence of equational constraints. We then
discuss preliminary results showing the same for the degree of those
polynomials. The results are under primitivity assumptions whose importance we
illustrate.Comment: Extended Abstract for ICMS 2016 Presentation. arXiv admin note: text
overlap with arXiv:1605.0249
Comparing machine learning models to choose the variable ordering for cylindrical algebraic decomposition
There has been recent interest in the use of machine learning (ML) approaches
within mathematical software to make choices that impact on the computing
performance without affecting the mathematical correctness of the result. We
address the problem of selecting the variable ordering for cylindrical
algebraic decomposition (CAD), an important algorithm in Symbolic Computation.
Prior work to apply ML on this problem implemented a Support Vector Machine
(SVM) to select between three existing human-made heuristics, which did better
than anyone heuristic alone. The present work extends to have ML select the
variable ordering directly, and to try a wider variety of ML techniques.
We experimented with the NLSAT dataset and the Regular Chains Library CAD
function for Maple 2018. For each problem, the variable ordering leading to the
shortest computing time was selected as the target class for ML. Features were
generated from the polynomial input and used to train the following ML models:
k-nearest neighbours (KNN) classifier, multi-layer perceptron (MLP), decision
tree (DT) and SVM, as implemented in the Python scikit-learn package. We also
compared these with the two leading human constructed heuristics for the
problem: Brown's heuristic and sotd. On this dataset all of the ML approaches
outperformed the human made heuristics, some by a large margin.Comment: Accepted into CICM 201
- …