2,275 research outputs found

    Gamma regularization based reconstruction for low dose CT

    No full text
    International audienceReducing the radiation in computerized tomography is today a major concern in radiology. Low dose computerized tomography (LDCT) offers a sound way to deal with this problem. However, more severe noise in the reconstructed CT images is observed under low dose scan protocols (e.g. lowered tube current or voltage values). In this paper we propose a Gamma regularization based algorithm for LDCT image reconstruction. This solution provides a good balance between the regularizations based on l 0-norm and l 1-norm. We evaluate the proposed approach using the projection data from simulated phantoms and scanned Catphan phantoms. Qualitative and quantitative results show that the Gamma regularization based reconstruction can perform better in both edge-preserving and noise suppression when compared with other regularizations using integer norms

    Robust residual-guided iterative reconstruction for sparse-view CT in small animal imaging

    Get PDF
    Objective. We introduce a robust image reconstruction algorithm named residual-guided Golub–Kahan iterative reconstruction technique (RGIRT) designed for sparse-view computed tomography (CT), which aims at high-fidelity image reconstruction from a limited number of projection views. Approach. RGIRT utilizes an inner-outer dual iteration framework, with a flexible least square QR (FLSQR) algorithm implemented in the inner iteration and a restarted iterative scheme applied in the outer iteration. The inner FLSQR employs a flexible Golub–Kahan bidiagonalization method to reduce the size of the inverse problem, and a weighted generalized cross-validation method to adaptively estimate the regularization hyper-parameter. The inner iteration efficiently yields the intermediate reconstruction result, while the outer iteration minimizes the residual and refines the solution by using the result obtained from the inner iteration. Main results. The reconstruction performance of RGIRT is evaluated and compared to other reference methods (FBPConvNet, SART-TV, and FLSQR) using projection data from both numerical phantoms and real experimental Micro-CT data. The experimental findings, from testing various numbers of projection views and different noise levels, underscore the robustness of RGIRT. Meanwhile, theoretical analysis confirms the convergence of residual for our approach. Significance. We propose a robust iterative reconstruction algorithm for x-ray CT scans with sparse views, thereby shortening scanning time and mitigating excessive ionizing radiation exposure to small animals

    Iterative CT reconstruction from few projections for the nondestructive post irradiation examination of nuclear fuel assemblies

    Get PDF
    The core components (e.g. fuel assemblies, spacer grids, control rods) of the nuclear reactors encounter harsh environment due to high temperature, physical stress, and a tremendous level of radiation. The integrity of these elements is crucial for safe operation of the nuclear power plants. The Post Irradiation Examination (PIE) can reveal information about the integrity of the elements during normal operations and off‐normal events. Computed tomography (CT) is a tool for evaluating the structural integrity of elements non-destructively. CT requires many projections to be acquired from different view angles after which a mathematical algorithm is adopted for reconstruction. Obtaining many projections is laborious and expensive in nuclear industries. Reconstructions from a small number of projections are explored to achieve faster and cost-efficient PIE. Classical reconstruction algorithms (e.g. filtered back projection) cannot offer stable reconstructions from few projections and create severe streaking artifacts. In this thesis, conventional algorithms are reviewed, and new algorithms are developed for reconstructions of the nuclear fuel assemblies using few projections. CT reconstruction from few projections falls into two categories: the sparse-view CT and the limited-angle CT or tomosynthesis. Iterative reconstruction algorithms are developed for both cases in the field of compressed sensing (CS). The performance of the algorithms is assessed using simulated projections and validated through real projections. The thesis also describes the systematic strategy towards establishing the conditions of reconstructions and finds the optimal imaging parameters for reconstructions of the fuel assemblies from few projections. --Abstract, page iii

    Computed tomography medical image reconstruction on affordable equipment by using Out-Of-Core techniques

    Get PDF
    [EN] Background and objective: As Computed Tomography scans are an essential medical test, many techniques have been proposed to reconstruct high-quality images using a smaller amount of radiation. One approach is to employ algebraic factorization methods to reconstruct the images, using fewer views than the traditional analytical methods. However, their main drawback is the high computational cost and hence the time needed to obtain the images, which is critical in the daily clinical practice. For this reason, faster methods for solving this problem are required. Methods: In this paper, we propose a new reconstruction method based on the QR factorization that is very efficient on affordable equipment (standard multicore processors and standard Solid-State Drives) by using Out-Of-Core techniques. Results: Combining both affordable hardware and the new software proposed in our work, the images can be reconstructed very quickly and with high quality. We analyze the reconstructions using real Computed Tomography images selected from a dataset, comparing the QR method to the LSQR and FBP. We measure the quality of the images using the metrics Peak Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Structural Similarity Index, obtaining very high values. We also compare the efficiency of using spinning disks versus Solid-State Drives, showing how the latter performs the Input/Output operations in a significantly lower amount of time. Conclusions: The results indicate that our proposed me thod and software are valid to efficiently solve large-scale systems and can be applied to the Computed Tomography reconstruction problem to obtain high-quality images.This research has been supported by "Universitat Politecnica de Valencia", "Generalitat Valenciana" under PROMETEO/2018/035 and ACIF/2017/075, co-financed by FEDER and FSE funds, and the "Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities" under Grant RTI2018-098156-B-C54 co-financed by FEDER funds.ChillarĂłn-PĂ©rez, M.; Quintana OrtĂ­, G.; Vidal-Gimeno, V.; VerdĂș MartĂ­n, GJ. (2020). Computed tomography medical image reconstruction on affordable equipment by using Out-Of-Core techniques. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 193:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105488S111193Berrington de GonzĂĄlez, A. (2009). Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(22), 2071. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440HALL, E. J., & BRENNER, D. J. (2008). Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. The British Journal of Radiology, 81(965), 362-378. doi:10.1259/bjr/01948454Tang, X., Hsieh, J., Nilsen, R. A., Dutta, S., Samsonov, D., & Hagiwara, A. (2006). A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT—helical scanning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51(4), 855-874. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/007Zhuang, T., Leng, S., Nett, B. E., & Chen, G.-H. (2004). Fan-beam and cone-beam image reconstruction via filtering the backprojection image of differentiated projection data. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49(24), 5489-5503. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/007Mori, S., Endo, M., Komatsu, S., Kandatsu, S., Yashiro, T., & Baba, M. (2006). A combination-weighted Feldkamp-based reconstruction algorithm for cone-beam CT. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51(16), 3953-3965. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/16/005Willemink, M. J., de Jong, P. A., Leiner, T., de Heer, L. M., Nievelstein, R. A. J., Budde, R. P. J., & Schilham, A. M. R. (2013). Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles. European Radiology, 23(6), 1623-1631. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2765-yWillemink, M. J., Leiner, T., de Jong, P. A., de Heer, L. M., Nievelstein, R. A. J., Schilham, A. M. R., & Budde, R. P. J. (2013). Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality. European Radiology, 23(6), 1632-1642. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2764-zWu, W., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., & Yu, H. (2019). Non-Local Low-Rank Cube-Based Tensor Factorization for Spectral CT Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(4), 1079-1093. doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2878226Wu, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, F., Chen, P., & Yu, H. (2018). Low-dose spectral CT reconstruction using image gradient ℓ0–norm and tensor dictionary. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 63, 538-557. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.006Andersen, A. H. (1989). Algebraic reconstruction in CT from limited views. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 8(1), 50-55. doi:10.1109/42.20361Andersen, A. H., & Kak, A. C. (1984). Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm. Ultrasonic Imaging, 6(1), 81-94. doi:10.1177/016173468400600107Yu, W., & Zeng, L. (2014). A Novel Weighted Total Difference Based Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Few-View Computed Tomography. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109345. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109345Flores, L., Vidal, V., & VerdĂș, G. (2015). Iterative Reconstruction from Few-view Projections. Procedia Computer Science, 51, 703-712. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.188Flores, L. A., Vidal, V., Mayo, P., Rodenas, F., & VerdĂș, G. (2014). Parallel CT image reconstruction based on GPUs. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 95, 247-250. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.03.011ChillarĂłn, M., Vidal, V., Segrelles, D., Blanquer, I., & VerdĂș, G. (2017). Combining Grid Computing and Docker Containers for the Study and Parametrization of CT Image Reconstruction Methods. Procedia Computer Science, 108, 1195-1204. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.065Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Schwaiger, B. J., Gersing, A. S., Kopp, F. K., Bippus, R., 
 Baum, T. (2018). Effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on MDCT-based femoral BMD measurements. Osteoporosis International, 29(12), 2685-2692. doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4675-6Yan Liu, Zhengrong Liang, Jianhua Ma, Hongbing Lu, Ke Wang, Hao Zhang, & Moore, W. (2014). Total Variation-Stokes Strategy for Sparse-View X-ray CT Image Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 33(3), 749-763. doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2295738Tang, J., Nett, B. E., & Chen, G.-H. (2009). Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54(19), 5781-5804. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/008Vandeghinste, B., Vandenberghe, S., Vanhove, C., Staelens, S., & Van Holen, R. (2013). Low-Dose Micro-CT Imaging for Vascular Segmentation and Analysis Using Sparse-View Acquisitions. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e68449. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068449Qi, H., Chen, Z., & Zhou, L. (2015). CT Image Reconstruction from Sparse Projections Using Adaptive TpV Regularization. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2015, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2015/354869Wu, W., Chen, P., Vardhanabhuti, V. V., Wu, W., & Yu, H. (2019). Improved Material Decomposition With a Two-Step Regularization for Spectral CT. IEEE Access, 7, 158770-158781. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950427Rodriguez-Alvarez, M. J., Sanchez, F., Soriano, A., Moliner, L., Sanchez, S., & Benlloch, J. (2018). QR-Factorization Algorithm for Computed Tomography (CT): Comparison With FDK and Conjugate Gradient (CG) Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 2(5), 459-469. doi:10.1109/trpms.2018.2843803ChillarĂłn, M., Vidal, V., & VerdĂș, G. (2020). CT image reconstruction with SuiteSparseQR factorization package. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 167, 108289. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.04.039Joseph, P. M. (1982). An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1(3), 192-196. doi:10.1109/tmi.1982.4307572S. Toledo, F. Gustavson, The design and implementation of solar, a portable library for scalable out-of-core linear algebra computations, in: Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on I/O in Parallel and Distributed Systems, IOPADS,D’Azevedo, E., & Dongarra, J. (2000). The design and implementation of the parallel out-of-core ScaLAPACK LU, QR, and Cholesky factorization routines. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, 12(15), 1481-1493. doi:10.1002/1096-9128(20001225)12:153.0.co;2-vGunter, B. C., & Van De Geijn, R. A. (2005). Parallel out-of-core computation and updating of the QR factorization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 31(1), 60-78. doi:10.1145/1055531.1055534Quintana-OrtĂ­, G., Igual, F. D., MarquĂ©s, M., Quintana-OrtĂ­, E. S., & van de Geijn, R. A. (2012). A Runtime System for Programming Out-of-Core Matrix Algorithms-by-Tiles on Multithreaded Architectures. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 38(4), 1-25. doi:10.1145/2331130.2331133MarquĂ©s, M., Quintana-OrtĂ­, G., Quintana-OrtĂ­, E. S., & van de Geijn, R. (2010). Using desktop computers to solve large-scale dense linear algebra problems. The Journal of Supercomputing, 58(2), 145-150. doi:10.1007/s11227-010-0394-2G. Lauritsch, H. Bruder, FORBILD head phantom, http://www.imp.uni-erlangen.de/phantoms/head/head.html.Yan, K., Wang, X., Lu, L., & Summers, R. M. (2018). DeepLesion: automated mining of large-scale lesion annotations and universal lesion detection with deep learning. Journal of Medical Imaging, 5(03), 1. doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.3.036501Miqueles, E., Koshev, N., & Helou, E. S. (2018). A Backprojection Slice Theorem for Tomographic Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(2), 894-906. doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2766785N. Koshev, E.S. Helou, E.X. Miqueles, Fast backprojection techniques for high resolution tomographyarXiv preprint: 1608.03589
    • 

    corecore