857 research outputs found
Total Haskell is Reasonable Coq
We would like to use the Coq proof assistant to mechanically verify
properties of Haskell programs. To that end, we present a tool, named
hs-to-coq, that translates total Haskell programs into Coq programs via a
shallow embedding. We apply our tool in three case studies -- a lawful Monad
instance, "Hutton's razor", and an existing data structure library -- and prove
their correctness. These examples show that this approach is viable: both that
hs-to-coq applies to existing Haskell code, and that the output it produces is
amenable to verification.Comment: 13 pages plus references. Published at CPP'18, In Proceedings of 7th
ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs
(CPP'18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201
Type classes for efficient exact real arithmetic in Coq
Floating point operations are fast, but require continuous effort on the part
of the user in order to ensure that the results are correct. This burden can be
shifted away from the user by providing a library of exact analysis in which
the computer handles the error estimates. Previously, we [Krebbers/Spitters
2011] provided a fast implementation of the exact real numbers in the Coq proof
assistant. Our implementation improved on an earlier implementation by O'Connor
by using type classes to describe an abstract specification of the underlying
dense set from which the real numbers are built. In particular, we used dyadic
rationals built from Coq's machine integers to obtain a 100 times speed up of
the basic operations already. This article is a substantially expanded version
of [Krebbers/Spitters 2011] in which the implementation is extended in the
various ways. First, we implement and verify the sine and cosine function.
Secondly, we create an additional implementation of the dense set based on
Coq's fast rational numbers. Thirdly, we extend the hierarchy to capture order
on undecidable structures, while it was limited to decidable structures before.
This hierarchy, based on type classes, allows us to share theory on the
naturals, integers, rationals, dyadics, and reals in a convenient way. Finally,
we obtain another dramatic speed-up by avoiding evaluation of termination
proofs at runtime.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1105.275
Optimizing a Certified Proof Checker for a Large-Scale Computer-Generated Proof
In recent work, we formalized the theory of optimal-size sorting networks
with the goal of extracting a verified checker for the large-scale
computer-generated proof that 25 comparisons are optimal when sorting 9 inputs,
which required more than a decade of CPU time and produced 27 GB of proof
witnesses. The checker uses an untrusted oracle based on these witnesses and is
able to verify the smaller case of 8 inputs within a couple of days, but it did
not scale to the full proof for 9 inputs. In this paper, we describe several
non-trivial optimizations of the algorithm in the checker, obtained by
appropriately changing the formalization and capitalizing on the symbiosis with
an adequate implementation of the oracle. We provide experimental evidence of
orders of magnitude improvements to both runtime and memory footprint for 8
inputs, and actually manage to check the full proof for 9 inputs.Comment: IMADA-preprint-c
Formalizing Size-Optimal Sorting Networks: Extracting a Certified Proof Checker
Since the proof of the four color theorem in 1976, computer-generated proofs
have become a reality in mathematics and computer science. During the last
decade, we have seen formal proofs using verified proof assistants being used
to verify the validity of such proofs.
In this paper, we describe a formalized theory of size-optimal sorting
networks. From this formalization we extract a certified checker that
successfully verifies computer-generated proofs of optimality on up to 8
inputs. The checker relies on an untrusted oracle to shortcut the search for
witnesses on more than 1.6 million NP-complete subproblems.Comment: IMADA-preprint-c
Gradual Certified Programming in Coq
Expressive static typing disciplines are a powerful way to achieve
high-quality software. However, the adoption cost of such techniques should not
be under-estimated. Just like gradual typing allows for a smooth transition
from dynamically-typed to statically-typed programs, it seems desirable to
support a gradual path to certified programming. We explore gradual certified
programming in Coq, providing the possibility to postpone the proofs of
selected properties, and to check "at runtime" whether the properties actually
hold. Casts can be integrated with the implicit coercion mechanism of Coq to
support implicit cast insertion a la gradual typing. Additionally, when
extracting Coq functions to mainstream languages, our encoding of casts
supports lifting assumed properties into runtime checks. Much to our surprise,
it is not necessary to extend Coq in any way to support gradual certified
programming. A simple mix of type classes and axioms makes it possible to bring
gradual certified programming to Coq in a straightforward manner.Comment: DLS'15 final version, Proceedings of the ACM Dynamic Languages
Symposium (DLS 2015
TRX: A Formally Verified Parser Interpreter
Parsing is an important problem in computer science and yet surprisingly
little attention has been devoted to its formal verification. In this paper, we
present TRX: a parser interpreter formally developed in the proof assistant
Coq, capable of producing formally correct parsers. We are using parsing
expression grammars (PEGs), a formalism essentially representing recursive
descent parsing, which we consider an attractive alternative to context-free
grammars (CFGs). From this formalization we can extract a parser for an
arbitrary PEG grammar with the warranty of total correctness, i.e., the
resulting parser is terminating and correct with respect to its grammar and the
semantics of PEGs; both properties formally proven in Coq.Comment: 26 pages, LMC
An implementation of Deflate in Coq
The widely-used compression format "Deflate" is defined in RFC 1951 and is
based on prefix-free codings and backreferences. There are unclear points about
the way these codings are specified, and several sources for confusion in the
standard. We tried to fix this problem by giving a rigorous mathematical
specification, which we formalized in Coq. We produced a verified
implementation in Coq which achieves competitive performance on inputs of
several megabytes. In this paper we present the several parts of our
implementation: a fully verified implementation of canonical prefix-free
codings, which can be used in other compression formats as well, and an elegant
formalism for specifying sophisticated formats, which we used to implement both
a compression and decompression algorithm in Coq which we formally prove
inverse to each other -- the first time this has been achieved to our
knowledge. The compatibility to other Deflate implementations can be shown
empirically. We furthermore discuss some of the difficulties, specifically
regarding memory and runtime requirements, and our approaches to overcome them
Postcondition-preserving fusion of postorder tree transformations
Tree transformations are commonly used in applications such as program rewriting in compilers. Using a series of simple transformations to build a more complex system can make the resulting software easier to understand, maintain, and reason about. Fusion strategies for combining such successive tree transformations promote this modularity, whilst mitigating the performance impact from increased numbers of tree traversals. However, it is important to ensure that fused transformations still perform their intended tasks. Existing approaches to fusing tree transformations tend to take an informal approach to soundness, or be too restrictive to consider the kind of transformations needed in a compiler. We use postconditions to define a more useful formal notion of successful fusion, namely postcondition-preserving fusion. We also present criteria that are sufficient to ensure postcondition-preservation and facilitate modular reasoning about the success of fusion
- …