In recent work, we formalized the theory of optimal-size sorting networks
with the goal of extracting a verified checker for the large-scale
computer-generated proof that 25 comparisons are optimal when sorting 9 inputs,
which required more than a decade of CPU time and produced 27 GB of proof
witnesses. The checker uses an untrusted oracle based on these witnesses and is
able to verify the smaller case of 8 inputs within a couple of days, but it did
not scale to the full proof for 9 inputs. In this paper, we describe several
non-trivial optimizations of the algorithm in the checker, obtained by
appropriately changing the formalization and capitalizing on the symbiosis with
an adequate implementation of the oracle. We provide experimental evidence of
orders of magnitude improvements to both runtime and memory footprint for 8
inputs, and actually manage to check the full proof for 9 inputs.Comment: IMADA-preprint-c
