44,367 research outputs found
Time-Aware Probabilistic Knowledge Graphs
The emergence of open information extraction as a tool for constructing and expanding knowledge graphs has aided the growth of temporal data, for instance, YAGO, NELL and Wikidata. While YAGO and Wikidata maintain the valid time of facts, NELL records the time point at which a fact is retrieved from some Web corpora. Collectively, these knowledge graphs (KG) store facts extracted from Wikipedia and other sources. Due to the imprecise nature of the extraction tools that are used to build and expand KG, such as NELL, the facts in the KG are weighted (a confidence value representing the correctness of a fact). Additionally, NELL can be considered as a transaction time KG because every fact is associated with extraction date. On the other hand, YAGO and Wikidata use the valid time model because they maintain facts together with their validity time (temporal scope). In this paper, we propose a bitemporal model (that combines transaction and valid time models) for maintaining and querying bitemporal probabilistic knowledge graphs. We study coalescing and scalability of marginal and MAP inference. Moreover, we show that complexity of reasoning tasks in atemporal probabilistic KG carry over to the bitemporal setting. Finally, we report our evaluation results of the proposed model
Ranking Archived Documents for Structured Queries on Semantic Layers
Archived collections of documents (like newspaper and web archives) serve as
important information sources in a variety of disciplines, including Digital
Humanities, Historical Science, and Journalism. However, the absence of
efficient and meaningful exploration methods still remains a major hurdle in
the way of turning them into usable sources of information. A semantic layer is
an RDF graph that describes metadata and semantic information about a
collection of archived documents, which in turn can be queried through a
semantic query language (SPARQL). This allows running advanced queries by
combining metadata of the documents (like publication date) and content-based
semantic information (like entities mentioned in the documents). However, the
results returned by such structured queries can be numerous and moreover they
all equally match the query. In this paper, we deal with this problem and
formalize the task of "ranking archived documents for structured queries on
semantic layers". Then, we propose two ranking models for the problem at hand
which jointly consider: i) the relativeness of documents to entities, ii) the
timeliness of documents, and iii) the temporal relations among the entities.
The experimental results on a new evaluation dataset show the effectiveness of
the proposed models and allow us to understand their limitation
Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches
In dialogical argumentation it is often assumed that the involved parties
always correctly identify the intended statements posited by each other,
realize all of the associated relations, conform to the three acceptability
states (accepted, rejected, undecided), adjust their views when new and correct
information comes in, and that a framework handling only attack relations is
sufficient to represent their opinions. Although it is natural to make these
assumptions as a starting point for further research, removing them or even
acknowledging that such removal should happen is more challenging for some of
these concepts than for others. Probabilistic argumentation is one of the
approaches that can be harnessed for more accurate user modelling. The
epistemic approach allows us to represent how much a given argument is believed
by a given person, offering us the possibility to express more than just three
agreement states. It is equipped with a wide range of postulates, including
those that do not make any restrictions concerning how initial arguments should
be viewed, thus potentially being more adequate for handling beliefs of the
people that have not fully disclosed their opinions in comparison to Dung's
semantics. The constellation approach can be used to represent the views of
different people concerning the structure of the framework we are dealing with,
including cases in which not all relations are acknowledged or when they are
seen differently than intended. Finally, bipolar argumentation frameworks can
be used to express both positive and negative relations between arguments. In
this paper we describe the results of an experiment in which participants
judged dialogues in terms of agreement and structure. We compare our findings
with the aforementioned assumptions as well as with the constellation and
epistemic approaches to probabilistic argumentation and bipolar argumentation
Generating and Sampling Orbits for Lifted Probabilistic Inference
A key goal in the design of probabilistic inference algorithms is identifying
and exploiting properties of the distribution that make inference tractable.
Lifted inference algorithms identify symmetry as a property that enables
efficient inference and seek to scale with the degree of symmetry of a
probability model. A limitation of existing exact lifted inference techniques
is that they do not apply to non-relational representations like factor graphs.
In this work we provide the first example of an exact lifted inference
algorithm for arbitrary discrete factor graphs. In addition we describe a
lifted Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo algorithm that provably mixes rapidly in the
degree of symmetry of the distribution
- …