11,366 research outputs found
Hardness measures and resolution lower bounds
Various "hardness" measures have been studied for resolution, providing
theoretical insight into the proof complexity of resolution and its fragments,
as well as explanations for the hardness of instances in SAT solving. In this
report we aim at a unified view of a number of hardness measures, including
different measures of width, space and size of resolution proofs. We also
extend these measures to all clause-sets (possibly satisfiable).Comment: 43 pages, preliminary version (yet the application part is only
sketched, with proofs missing
Distributed PCP Theorems for Hardness of Approximation in P
We present a new distributed model of probabilistically checkable proofs
(PCP). A satisfying assignment to a CNF formula is
shared between two parties, where Alice knows , Bob knows
, and both parties know . The goal is to have
Alice and Bob jointly write a PCP that satisfies , while
exchanging little or no information. Unfortunately, this model as-is does not
allow for nontrivial query complexity. Instead, we focus on a non-deterministic
variant, where the players are helped by Merlin, a third party who knows all of
.
Using our framework, we obtain, for the first time, PCP-like reductions from
the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) to approximation problems in P.
In particular, under SETH we show that there are no truly-subquadratic
approximation algorithms for Bichromatic Maximum Inner Product over
{0,1}-vectors, Bichromatic LCS Closest Pair over permutations, Approximate
Regular Expression Matching, and Diameter in Product Metric. All our
inapproximability factors are nearly-tight. In particular, for the first two
problems we obtain nearly-polynomial factors of ; only
-factor lower bounds (under SETH) were known before
Exponential Resolution Lower Bounds for Weak Pigeonhole Principle and Perfect Matching Formulas over Sparse Graphs
We show exponential lower bounds on resolution proof length for pigeonhole
principle (PHP) formulas and perfect matching formulas over highly unbalanced,
sparse expander graphs, thus answering the challenge to establish strong lower
bounds in the regime between balanced constant-degree expanders as in
[Ben-Sasson and Wigderson '01] and highly unbalanced, dense graphs as in [Raz
'04] and [Razborov '03, '04]. We obtain our results by revisiting Razborov's
pseudo-width method for PHP formulas over dense graphs and extending it to
sparse graphs. This further demonstrates the power of the pseudo-width method,
and we believe it could potentially be useful for attacking also other
longstanding open problems for resolution and other proof systems
A Generalized Method for Proving Polynomial Calculus Degree Lower Bounds
We study the problem of obtaining lower bounds for polynomial calculus (PC)
and polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) on proof degree, and hence by
[Impagliazzo et al. '99] also on proof size. [Alekhnovich and Razborov '03]
established that if the clause-variable incidence graph of a CNF formula F is a
good enough expander, then proving that F is unsatisfiable requires high PC/PCR
degree. We further develop the techniques in [AR03] to show that if one can
"cluster" clauses and variables in a way that "respects the structure" of the
formula in a certain sense, then it is sufficient that the incidence graph of
this clustered version is an expander. As a corollary of this, we prove that
the functional pigeonhole principle (FPHP) formulas require high PC/PCR degree
when restricted to constant-degree expander graphs. This answers an open
question in [Razborov '02], and also implies that the standard CNF encoding of
the FPHP formulas require exponential proof size in polynomial calculus
resolution. Thus, while Onto-FPHP formulas are easy for polynomial calculus, as
shown in [Riis '93], both FPHP and Onto-PHP formulas are hard even when
restricted to bounded-degree expanders.Comment: Full-length version of paper to appear in Proceedings of the 30th
Annual Computational Complexity Conference (CCC '15), June 201
Planar tautologies hard for resolution.
We prove exponential lower bounds on the resolution proofs of some tautologies, based on rectangular grid graphs. More specifically, we show a 2/sup /spl Omega/(n)/ lower bound for any resolution proof of the mutilated chessboard problem on a 2n/spl times/2n chessboard as well as for the Tseitin tautology (G. Tseitin, 1968) based on the n/spl times/n rectangular grid graph. The former result answers a 35 year old conjecture by J. McCarthy (1964)
The Complexity of Some Geometric Proof Systems
In this Thesis we investigate proof systems based on Integer Linear Programming. These methods inspect the solution space of an unsatisfiable propositional formula and prove that this space contains no integral points.
We begin by proving some size and depth lower bounds for a recent proof system, Stabbing Planes, and along the way introduce some novel methods for doing so.
We then turn to the complexity of propositional contradictions generated uniformly from first order sentences, in Stabbing Planes and Sum-Of-Squares.
We finish by investigating the complexity-theoretic impact of the choice of method of generating these propositional contradictions in Sherali-Adams
Space complexity in polynomial calculus
During the last decade, an active line of research in proof complexity has been to study space
complexity and time-space trade-offs for proofs. Besides being a natural complexity measure of
intrinsic interest, space is also an important issue in SAT solving, and so research has mostly focused
on weak systems that are used by SAT solvers.
There has been a relatively long sequence of papers on space in resolution, which is now reasonably
well understood from this point of view. For other natural candidates to study, however, such as
polynomial calculus or cutting planes, very little has been known. We are not aware of any nontrivial
space lower bounds for cutting planes, and for polynomial calculus the only lower bound has been
for CNF formulas of unbounded width in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02], where the space lower bound is
smaller than the initial width of the clauses in the formulas. Thus, in particular, it has been consistent
with current knowledge that polynomial calculus could be able to refute any k-CNF formula in
constant space.
In this paper, we prove several new results on space in polynomial calculus (PC), and in the
extended proof system polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) studied in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02]:
1. We prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PC for the canonical 3-CNF version of the pigeonhole
principle formulas PHPm
n with m pigeons and n holes, and show that this is tight.
2. For PCR, we prove an Ω(n) space lower bound for a bitwise encoding of the functional pigeonhole
principle. These formulas have width O(log n), and hence this is an exponential
improvement over [Alekhnovich et al. ’02] measured in the width of the formulas.
3. We then present another encoding of the pigeonhole principle that has constant width, and
prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PCR for these formulas as well.
4. Finally, we prove that any k-CNF formula can be refuted in PC in simultaneous exponential
size and linear space (which holds for resolution and thus for PCR, but was not obviously
the case for PC). We also characterize a natural class of CNF formulas for which the space
complexity in resolution and PCR does not change when the formula is transformed into 3-CNF
in the canonical way, something that we believe can be useful when proving PCR space lower
bounds for other well-studied formula families in proof complexity
- …