Interoperability of Information Systems Managed and Used by the Local Health Departments

Background: In the post-Affordable Care Act era marked by interorganizational collaborations and availability of large amounts of electronic data from other community partners, it is imperative to assess the interoperability of information systems used by the local health departments (LHDs). Objectives: To describe the level of interoperability of LHD information systems and identify factors associated with lack of interoperability. Data and Methods: This mixed-methods research uses data from the 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Survey, with a target population of all LHDs in the United States. A representative sample of 650 LHDs was drawn using a stratified random sampling design. A total of 324 completed responses were received (50% response rate). Qualitative data were used from a key informant interview study of LHD informatics staff from across the United States. Qualitative data were independently coded by 2 researchers and analyzed thematically. Survey data were cleaned, bivariate comparisons were conducted, and a multivariable logistic regression was run to characterize factors associated with interoperability. Results: For 30% of LHDs, no systems were interoperable, and 38% of LHD respondents indicated some of the systems were interoperable. Significant determinants of interoperability included LHDs having leadership support (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.54), control of information technology budget allocation (AOR = 2.48), control of data systems (AOR = 2.31), having a strategic plan for information systems (AOR = 1.92), and existence of business process analysis and redesign (AOR = 1.49). Conclusion: Interoperability of all systems may be an informatics goal, but only a small proportion of LHDs reported having interoperable systems, pointing to a substantial need among LHDs nationwide

Health Information Exchange Use in Primary Care

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)The United States has invested over $40 billion in digitizing the health care system, yet the anticipated gains in improved care coordination, quality, and cost savings remain largely unrealized. This is due in part to limited interoperability and low rates of health information exchange (HIE) use, which can support care coordination and improve provider decision-making. Primary care providers are central to the US health care delivery system and frequently function as care coordinators, yet capability and HIE use gaps among these providers limit the potential of these digital systems to achieve their intended goals. I study HIE use in the context of primary care to examine 1) factors associated with provider HIE use, 2) the extent and nature of team-based HIE use, and 3) differences in HIE system use patterns across discrete groups of system users. First, I use a national sample of primary care providers to analyze market and practice factors related to HIE use for patient referrals. Overall, I find that only 43% of primary care provider referrals used HIE. Furthermore, I find substantial variation in HIE use rates across electronic health record (EHR) vendors. Second, I use HIE system log data to understand the breadth and depth of HIE use among teams, a care model underpinning primary care delivery reform efforts. I find that although use of HIE systems remains low, in primary care settings it overwhelmingly takes place in a manner consistent with team-based care workflows. Furthermore, team-based use does not differ in breadth from single provider HIE use, but illustrates less depth before and after visits. Third, I apply cluster analysis to 16 HIE use measures representing 7 use attributes, and identify 5 discrete user groups. I then compare two of these user groups and find user-level variation in volume and efficiency of use, both of which have implications for HIE system design and usability improvements. Ultimately, these findings help to inform how HIE use can be increased and improved in primary care, moving the US health care system closer to realizing the coordination, quality, and cost savings made possible by a digitized delivery system

Hospital readmission prevention: a literature critique

The main purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature on interventions within the United States and globally, that aim to reduce hospital readmission. Special focus will be placed among interventions that aim to reduce hospital readmission among Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries. With healthcare costs continually rising and hospital reimbursement dependent on patient satisfaction and length of stay, hospital readmissions have become a manner of measuring quality of patient care. Not only are hospital readmissions a measure of quality of care, they also impact the patient’s well-being as a whole. This topic has public health significance due to health disparities for those at higher risk for readmissions; it provides an area for future public health policies and interventions that will aim to decrease disparities in healthcare. This paper will review the policy background to the problem followed by the most common readmissions within American healthcare, a focus will be placed on factors that may impact readmissions including length of stay for most common readmissions. After, it will take a look at the impact of comorbidities on hospital readmissions before going into the literature critique of interventions, the critique will be followed by a discussion of the findings and the theoretical background to the interventions. Finally, the paper will aim to recommend an intervention that incorporates what current interventions are doing positively and fix those that are lacking

Between "the best way to deliver patient care" and "chaos and low clinical value": General Practitioners' and Practice Managers' views on data sharing

OBJECTIVE: In the UK, General Practitioners and Practice Managers are key to enabling health information exchange (typically referred to as 'data sharing'). This study aimed to survey GPs and PMs for familiarity, engagement with and perceptions of patient data sharing. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey. All 107 general practices in England's second largest Clinical Commissioning Group, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough CCG. Descriptive statistics; hierarchical logistic regression; thematic analysis. RESULTS: 405 (64%) responses were received - from 338 (62%) GPs and 67 (71%) PMs. Familiarity and engagement were highest for local frail elderly and end of life care projects (>76% had used). The greatest difference in use concerned the now suspended national care.data initiative: PMs had odds of reporting use 75 times higher than GP partners (95% CI 27-211). Patient confusion was the most pronounced challenge and improved coordination the most pronounced expected benefit. Frequency of discussions with patients varied with IT competence (OR 4.2 for most competent users relative to least, 95% CI 1.7-10.7) and clinical system (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5). Patient reservations were reported more frequently by respondents who rated their IT competence as highest (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.6), perceived more data sharing challenges (OR for a 1-point increase in challenges perception score 3.4, 95% CI 2.1-5.6) and by PMs (relative to GP partners, OR 18.0, 95% CI 7.9-41.3). CONCLUSIONS: Familiarity with and use of data sharing projects was high among GPs and PMs. Both their individual and organisational characteristics were associated with the reported frequency of discussions and patients' responses. Improved awareness of the impact of provider characteristics and attitudes on patients' decisions about data sharing may enhance the equity and autonomy of those decisions.This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care (CLAHRC) East of England, at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, as well as the Health Innovation and Education Cluster (HIEC) hosted by Cambridge University Health Partners (CUHP)

Factors Associated with Provider Utilization of the Heath Information Exchange in the State of Hawaii

In a context where technology is increasingly being incorporated into health care practice, many U.S. health care providers and organizations are finding it challenging to connect disparate electronic documentation systems to retrieve patient information when coordinating care across providers and heath care entities. Local and regional health information exchange (HIE) systems were created to facilitate collecting information into one integrated patient record to address information transfer between heath care providers. Yet, adoption and use of HIEs have been low. The purpose of this study was to review the predictive factors accounting for physicians\u27 use of a HIE in the U.S. state of Hawaii. Key factors from the technology acceptance model were evaluated to determine the behavioral intention resulting in actual use of the Hawaii health information exchange (HHIE). Physician characteristics (medical specialty, age, and gender) and location characteristics were also assessed. The total population of the study contained 1034 Hawaii physicians who have signed up to use the HHIE. Linear and logistic regression models were structured to evaluate the predictive nature of (a) use to determine if a physician has ever logged into the HIE and (b) usage to evaluate the extent to which a physician is logging into the HIE. Findings from the study reveal a predictive relationship between the characteristic of medical specialty and HHIE use when comparing primary care and emergency department physicians to physician specialists. Using study results, health care leaders can improve physician outreach and review barriers when using the HIE systems to coordinate care. Policy implications include the possible formulation of future requirements surrounding HIE physician participation

Impact of health information exchange adoption on referral patterns

Efforts to promote Health Information Exchanges (HIE) on a nationwide scale are beset with major challenges and one of them is its meaningful use for both physicians and patients. Referrals potentially provide a context for the meaningful use of HIE and we are yet to understand how HIEs affect referrals. This research studies the impact of HIE on referral patterns. We establish that participation in an HIE network increases the referrals sent to and received from other HIE participants. We investigate this relationship using both econometric and network-analytic methods. While the econometric analysis focuses on the underlying associations between HIE adoption and referral patterns, the network analysis addresses the transformation process by which HIE adoption and referrals co-evolve over time. This study has significant implications for healthcare policy-making, development of innovative HIE business models, and management of healthcare organizations

Two Essays on Analytical Capabilities: Antecedents and Consequences

Although organizations are rapidly embracing business analytics (BA) to enhance organizational performance, only a small proportion have managed to build analytical capabilities. While BA continues to draw attention from academics and practitioners, theoretical understanding of antecedents and consequences of analytical capabilities remain limited and lack a systematic view. In order to address the research gap, the two essays investigate: (a) the impact of organization’s core information processing mechanisms and its impact on analytical capabilities, (b) the sequential approach to integration of IT-enabled business processes and its impact on analytical capabilities, and (c) network position and its impact on analytical capabilities. Drawing upon the Information Processing Theory (IPT), the first essay investigates the relationship between organization’s core information processing mechanisms–i.e., electronic health record (EHRs), clinical information standards (CIS), and collaborative information exchange (CIE)–and its impact on analytical capabilities. We use data from two sources (HIMSS Analytics 2013 and AHA IT Survey 2013) to test the theorized relationships in the healthcare context empirically. Using the competitive progression theory, the second essay investigates whether organizations sequential approach to the integration of IT-enabled business processes is associated with increased analytical capabilities. We use data from three sources (HIMSS Analytics 2013, AHA IT Survey 2013, and CMS 2014) to test if sequential integration of EHRs –i.e., reflecting the unique organizational path of integration–has a significant impact on hospital’s analytical capability. Together the two essays advance our understanding of the factors that underlie enabling of firm’s analytical capabilities. We discuss in detail the theoretical and practical implications of the findings and the opportunities for future research

Electronic Information Sharing to Improve Post-Acute Care Transitions

Hospitals frequently transfer patients to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for post-acute care; information sharing between these settings is critical to ensure safe and effective transitions. Recent policy and payer initiatives have encouraged hospitals and SNFs to work together towards improving these care transitions, and associated patient outcomes such as avoidable re-hospitalizations. Exchanging information electronically, through health information exchange (HIE), can help facilitate information transfer, and has shown benefits to patient care in other contexts. But, it is unclear whether this evidence translates to the post-acute care context given the vulnerability of this patient population and complexities specific to coordination between acute and post-acute care settings. Chapter One estimates the national prevalence of hospital’s engagement in HIE with post-acute providers, and explores potential factors prompting this investment. 56% of hospitals report some level of HIE with post-acute care providers. This investment appears strategically to be more incidental than intentional; hospitals’ overall level of sophistication and investment in electronic health records and HIE strongly predicts whether HIE is occurring in the post-acute transition context. However, we see some evidence of association between participation in delivery and payment reforms and hospital use of HIE with post-acute providers. This suggests that HIE may increasingly be considered part of a comprehensive strategy to improve coordination between hospitals and post-acute care providers, though may lack the necessary customization to achieve meaningful value in this context. Chapter Two utilizes a difference-in-differences approach to assess HIE impact on patient outcomes in the post-acute context, exploiting one focal hospital’s selective implementation of HIE with just three partnering local SNFs. I find no measurable effect of HIE implementation on patient likelihood of re-hospitalization, relative to patients discharged to SNFs without HIE. However, log files that capture when and how these SNF providers use available HIE technology reveal significant variation in usage patterns. HIE was more often utilized following discharge situations where transitional care workflows may not be particularly robust, such as discharge from the ED or observation rather than an inpatient unit. However, the system was less likely to be used for more complex patients, and for patients discharged on the weekend – when SNFs operate at reduced staffing and may not have the bandwidth to leverage available technology. When we connect variation in usage patterns to likelihood of readmission, realizing patient care benefits depended on the timing (relative to patient transfer) and intensity (depth of information retrieved) of use. Chapter Three employs qualitative methods – semi-structured interviews with the focal hospital and five proximate SNFs – to better understand hospital-to-SNF transitions, and perceived opportunities and challenges in using HIE functionality to address information gaps. We capture five specific dimensions of information discontinuity; utilizing IT to address these issues is hindered by lack of process optimization from a sociotechnical perspective. Some SNFs lacked workflows to connect those with HIE access to the staff seeking information. Further, all facilities struggled with physician-centric transition processes that restricted availability of critical nursing and social work documentation, and promoted organizational changes that strengthened physician-to-physician handoff while unintentionally weakening inter-organizational transitional care processes. HIE has the potential to address information discontinuity that compromises post-acute transitions of care. These findings facilitate targeted efforts to help hospitals and SNFs pursue HIE in ways that are most likely to result in improved care quality and patient outcomes.PHDHealth Services Organization & PolicyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146031/1/dacross_1.pd

From "wading through treacle" to "making haste slowly": A comprehensive yet parsimonious model of drivers and challenges to implementing patient data sharing projects based on an EPaCCS evaluation and four pre-existing literature reviews.

Conceptually, this study aimed to 1) identify the challenges and drivers encountered by England's Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EPaCCS) projects in the context of challenges and drivers in other projects on data sharing for individual care (also referred to as Health Information Exchange, HIE) and 2) organise them in a comprehensive yet parsimonious framework. The study also had a strong applied goal: to derive specific and non-trivial recommendations for advancing data sharing projects, particularly ones in early stages of development and implementation. Primary data comprised 40 in-depth interviews with 44 healthcare professionals, patients, carers, project team members and decision makers in Cambridgeshire, UK. Secondary data were extracted from four pre-existing literature reviews on Health Information Exchange and Health Information Technology implementation covering 135 studies. Thematic and framework analysis underpinned by "pluralist" coding were the main analytical approaches used. We reduced an initial set of >1,800 parameters into >500 challenges and >300 drivers to implementing EPaCCS and other data sharing projects. Less than a quarter of the 800+ parameters were associated primarily with the IT solution. These challenges and drivers were further condensed into an action-guiding, strategy-informing framework of nine types of "pure challenges", four types of "pure drivers", and nine types of "oppositional or ambivalent forces". The pure challenges draw parallels between patient data sharing and other broad and complex domains of sociotechnical or social practice. The pure drivers differ in how internal or external to the IT solution and project team they are, and thus in the level of control a project team has over them. The oppositional forces comprise pairs of challenges and drivers where the driver is a factor serving to resolve or counteract the challenge. The ambivalent forces are factors perceived simultaneously as a challenge and a driver depending on context, goals and perspective. The framework is distinctive in its emphasis on: 1) the form of challenges and drivers; 2) ambivalence, ambiguity and persistent tensions as fundamental forces in the field of innovation implementation; and 3) the parallels it draws with a variety of non-IT, non-health domains of practice as a source of fruitful learning. Teams working on data sharing projects need to prioritise further the shaping of social interactions and structural and contextual parameters in the midst of which their IT tools are implemented. The high number of "ambivalent forces" speaks of the vital importance for data sharing projects of skills in eliciting stakeholders' assumptions; managing conflict; and navigating multiple needs, interests and worldviews

Securely sharing dynamic medical information in e-health

This thesis has introduced an infrastructure to share dynamic medical data between mixed health care providers in a secure way, which could benefit the health care system as a whole. The study results of the universally data sharing into a varied patient information system prototypes