32,839 research outputs found
The number of k-intersections of an intersecting family of r-sets
The Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem tells us how large an intersecting family of r-sets
from an n-set can be, while results due to Lovasz and Tuza give bounds on the
number of singletons that can occur as pairwise intersections of sets from such
a family.
We consider a natural generalization of these problems. Given an intersecting
family of r-sets from an n-set and 1\leq k \leq r, how many k-sets can occur as
pairwise intersections of sets from the family? For k=r and k=1 this reduces to
the problems described above. We answer this question exactly for all values of
k and r, when n is sufficiently large. We also characterize the extremal
families.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figur
Set Systems with No Singleton Intersection
Let be a -uniform set system defined on a ground set of size with no singleton intersection; i.e., no pair has . Frankl showed that for and sufficiently large, confirming a conjecture of ErdĆs and SĂłs. We determine the maximum size of for and all , and also establish a stability result for general , showing that any with size asymptotic to that of the best construction must be structurally similar to it
Set Systems with Restricted Cross-Intersections and the Minimum Rank of Inclusion Matrices
A set system is L-intersecting if any pairwise intersection size lies in L, where L is some set of s nonnegative integers. The celebrated Frankl-Ray-Chaudhuri-Wilson theorems give tight bounds on the size of an L-intersecting set system on a ground set of size n. Such a system contains at most sets if it is uniform and at most sets if it is nonuniform. They also prove modular versions of these results.
We consider the following extension of these problems. Call the set systems {\em L-cross-intersecting} if for every pair of distinct sets A,B with and for some the intersection size lies in . For any k and for n > n 0 (s) we give tight bounds on the maximum of . It is at most if the systems are uniform and at most if they are nonuniform. We also obtain modular versions of these results.
Our proofs use tools from linear algebra together with some combinatorial ideas. A key ingredient is a tight lower bound for the rank of the inclusion matrix of a set system. The s*-inclusion matrix of a set system on [n] is a matrix M with rows indexed by and columns by the subsets of [n] of size at most s, where if and with , we define M AB to be 1 if and 0 otherwise. Our bound generalizes the well-known result that if , then M has full rank . In a combinatorial setting this fact was proved by Frankl and Pach in the study of null t-designs; it can also be viewed as determining the minimum distance of the Reed-Muller codes
Coloring intersection graphs of arc-connected sets in the plane
A family of sets in the plane is simple if the intersection of its any
subfamily is arc-connected, and it is pierced by a line if the intersection
of its any member with is a nonempty segment. It is proved that the
intersection graphs of simple families of compact arc-connected sets in the
plane pierced by a common line have chromatic number bounded by a function of
their clique number.Comment: Minor changes + some additional references not included in the
journal versio
A formula for the number of tilings of an octagon by rhombi
We propose the first algebraic determinantal formula to enumerate tilings of
a centro-symmetric octagon of any size by rhombi. This result uses the
Gessel-Viennot technique and generalizes to any octagon a formula given by
Elnitsky in a special case.Comment: New title. Minor improvements. To appear in Theoretical Computer
Science, special issue on "Combinatorics of the Discrete Plane and Tilings
Almost-Fisher families
A classic theorem in combinatorial design theory is Fisher's inequality,
which states that a family of subsets of with all pairwise
intersections of size can have at most non-empty sets. One may
weaken the condition by requiring that for every set in , all but
at most of its pairwise intersections have size . We call such
families -almost -Fisher. Vu was the first to study the maximum
size of such families, proving that for the largest family has
sets, and characterising when equality is attained. We substantially refine his
result, showing how the size of the maximum family depends on . In
particular we prove that for small one essentially recovers Fisher's
bound. We also solve the next open case of and obtain the first
non-trivial upper bound for general .Comment: 27 pages (incluiding one appendix
- âŠ