Duration Measures for Corporate Project Valuation

Sensitivity analysis is a very common exercise performed with the forecasting of project cash flows. In this paper, a duration-type measure is generated that provides a single number for the assessment of project cash flows relative to changes in the discount rate (or adjusted for changes in a particular cash flow model parameter). The calculation is no more difficult than the duration measures that already exist for bonds. Yet, the calculation provides valuable insight that many times is lost when performing sensitivity analysis. Further, at a minimum, the measure provides a gauge for the consequences of mis-specifiying the discount rate for a project

Under armour equity research

A firm's value is determined using a variety of ways that allow for abetter understanding of how the company operates and what the company's future development goals are based on future trends that allow for forecasting the future. With this report we aim to estimate thevalueofthestocksofUnderArmouronthe31stofDecember2022.The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) was the method principally employed for this evaluation, together with a Multiple Assessment. The conclusion of the DCF valuation shows that the market underArmourisunderratedat$29.69asatargetprice,comparedwith$20.56asat12/2021.TheUnderArmourEquityApprovalRecommendationishenceaBUYRecommendation

Multiple-criteria cash-management policies with particular liquidity terms

[EN] Eliciting policies for cash management systems with multiple assets is by no means straightforward. Both the particular relationship between alternative assets and time delays from control decisions to availability of cash introduce additional difficulties. Here we propose a cash management model to derive short-term finance policies when considering multiple assets with different expected returns and particular liquidity terms for each alternative asset. In order to deal with the inherent uncertainty about the near future introduced by cash flows, we use forecasts as a key input to the model. We express uncertainty as lack of predictive accuracy and we derive a deterministic equivalent problem that depends on forecasting errors and preferences of cash managers. Since the assessment of the quality of forecasts is recommended, we describe a method to evaluate the impact of predictive accuracy in cash management policies. We illustrate this method through several numerical examples.Salas-Molina, F.; Pla Santamaría, D.; Garcia-Bernabeu, A.; Mayor-Vitoria, F. (2020). Multiple-criteria cash-management policies with particular liquidity terms. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics. 31(2):217-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpz010S217231312Abdelaziz, F. B., Aouni, B., & Fayedh, R. E. (2007). Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1811-1823. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.021Aouni, B., Ben Abdelaziz, F., & La Torre, D. (2012). The Stochastic Goal Programming Model: Theory and Applications. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 19(5-6), 185-200. doi:10.1002/mcda.1466Aouni, B., Colapinto, C., & La Torre, D. (2014). Financial portfolio management through the goal programming model: Current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 536-545. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.040Baccarin, S. (2009). Optimal impulse control for a multidimensional cash management system with generalized cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 198-206. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.040Ballestero, E. (2001). Stochastic goal programming: A mean–variance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(3), 476-481. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00084-9Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1998). Multiple Criteria Decision Making and its Applications to Economic Problems. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2827-9Bemporad, A., & Morari, M. (1999). Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints. Automatica, 35(3), 407-427. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(98)00178-2Cabello, J. G. (2013). Cash efficiency for bank branches. SpringerPlus, 2(1). doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-334García Cabello, J., & Lobillo, F. J. (2017). Sound branch cash management for less: A low-cost forecasting algorithm under uncertain demand. Omega, 70, 118-134. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.005Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-Constrained Programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73-79. doi:10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1977). Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 1(1), 39-54. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(77)81007-2Constantinides, G. M., & Richard, S. F. (1978). Existence of Optimal Simple Policies for Discounted-Cost Inventory and Cash Management in Continuous Time. Operations Research, 26(4), 620-636. doi:10.1287/opre.26.4.620Moraes, M. B. da C., & Nagano, M. S. (2014). Evolutionary models in cash management policies with multiple assets. Economic Modelling, 39, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.010Da Costa Moraes, M. B., Nagano, M. S., & Sobreiro, V. A. (2015). Stochastic Cash Flow Management Models: A Literature Review Since the 1980s. Decision Engineering, 11-28. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11949-6_2Eppen, G. D., & Fama, E. F. (1969). Cash Balance and Simple Dynamic Portfolio Problems with Proportional Costs. International Economic Review, 10(2), 119. doi:10.2307/2525547Gormley, F. M., & Meade, N. (2007). The utility of cash flow forecasts in the management of corporate cash balances. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 923-935. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.041Gregory, G. (1976). Cash flow models: A review. Omega, 4(6), 643-656. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(76)90092-xHerrera-Cáceres, C. A., & Ibeas, A. (2016). Model predictive control of cash balance in a cash concentration and disbursements system. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 353(18), 4885-4923. doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.09.007Higson, A., Yoshikatsu, S., & Tippett, M. (2009). Organization size and the optimal investment in cash. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 21(1), 27-38. doi:10.1093/imaman/dpp015Miller, M. H., & Orr, D. (1966). A Model of the Demand for Money by Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(3), 413. doi:10.2307/1880728Miller, T. W., & Stone, B. K. (1985). Daily Cash Forecasting and Seasonal Resolution: Alternative Models and Techniques for Using the Distribution Approach. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(3), 335. doi:10.2307/2331034Penttinen, M. J. (1991). Myopic and stationary solutions for stochastic cash balance problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(2), 155-166. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(91)90077-9Prékopa, A. (1995). Stochastic Programming. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3087-7Salas-Molina, F. (2017). Risk-sensitive control of cash management systems. Operational Research, 20(2), 1159-1176. doi:10.1007/s12351-017-0371-0Salas-Molina, F., Martin, F. J., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Serrà, J., & Arcos, J. L. (2017). Empowering cash managers to achieve cost savings by improving predictive accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(2), 403-415. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2016.11.002Salas-Molina, F., Pla-Santamaria, D., & Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. A. (2016). A multi-objective approach to the cash management problem. Annals of Operations Research, 267(1-2), 515-529. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2359-1Salas-Molina, F., Pla-Santamaria, D., & Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A. (2017). Empowering Cash Managers Through Compromise Programming. Financial Decision Aid Using Multiple Criteria, 149-173. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68876-3_7Salas-Molina, F., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., & Pla-Santamaria, D. (2018). Boundless multiobjective models for cash management. The Engineering Economist, 63(4), 363-381. doi:10.1080/0013791x.2018.1456596Srinivasan, V., & Kim, Y. H. (1986). Deterministic cash flow management: State of the art and research directions. Omega, 14(2), 145-166. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(86)90017-4Stone, B. K. (1972). The Use of Forecasts and Smoothing in Control-Limit Models for Cash Management. Financial Management, 1(1), 72. doi:10.2307/3664955Stone, B. K., & Miller, T. W. (1987). Daily Cash Forecasting with Multiplicative Models of Cash Flow Patterns. Financial Management, 16(4), 45. doi:10.2307/366610

Fit for planning? An evaluation of the application of development viability appraisal models in the UK planning system

The aim of this paper is to critically examine the application of development appraisal to viability assessment in the planning system. This evaluation is of development appraisal models in general and also their use in particular applications associated with estimating planning obligation capacity. The paper is organised into four themes: · The context and conceptual basis for development viability appraisal · A review of development viability appraisal methods · A discussion of selected key inputs into a development viability appraisal · A discussion of the applications of development viability appraisals in the planning system It is assumed that readers are familiar with the basic models and information needs of development viability appraisal rather than at the cutting edge of practice and/or academ

Under armour equity research

A firm's value is determined using a variety of ways that allow for a better understanding of how the company operates and what the company's future development goals are based on future trends that allow for forecasting the future. With this report we aim to estimate the value of the stocks of Under Armour on the 31stof December 2022.The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) was the method principally employed for this evaluation, together with a Multiple Assessment. The conclusion of the DCF valuation shows that the market under Armour is underrated at $29.69 as a target price, compared with$20.56 as at 12/2021. The Under Armour Equity Approval Recommendation is hence a BUY Recommendation

A decision support model for construction cash flow management

The excessive level of construction business failures and their association with financial difficulties has placed financial management in the forefront of many business imperatives. This has highlighted the importance of cash flow forecasting and management that has given rise to the development of several forecasting models. The traditional approach to the use of project financial models has been largely a project-oriented perspective. However, the dominating role of “project economics” in shaping “corporate economics” tends to place the corporate strategy at the mercy of the projects. This article approaches the concept of cash flow forecasting and management from a fresh perspective. Here, the use of forecasting models is extended beyond their traditional role as a guideline for monitoring and control of progress. They are regarded as tools for driving the project in the direction of corporate goals. The work is based on the premise that the main parties could negotiate the terms and attempt to complement their priorities. As part of this approach, a model is proposed for forecasting and management of project cash flow. The mathematical component of the model integrates three modules: an exponential and two fourth-degree polynomials. The model generates a forecast by potentially combining the outcome of data analysis with the experience and knowledge of the forecaster/organization. In light of corporate objectives, the generated forecast is then manipulated and replaced by a range of favorable but realistic cash flow profiles. Finally, through a negotiation with other parties, a compromised favorable cash flow is achieved. This article will describe the novel way the model is used as a decision support tool. Although the structure of the model and its mathematical components are described in detail, the data processing and analysis parts are briefly described and referenced accordingly. The viability of the model and the approach are demonstrated by means of a scenario

The accrual anomaly – focus on changes in specific unexpected accruals results in new evidence.

This paper deals with the accrual anomaly first documented by Sloan (1996), i.e. the finding that the stock market prices appear to overweigh the role of accruals persistence and under-weigh the role of operating cash flow persistence. In an analysis based on Danish financial statement data it is demonstrated that different specific components of earnings have significantly different earnings persistence characteristics and that these differences are not fully reflected in share prices. In the analysis presented here the earnings persistence effect of two particular unexpected accrual components are specifically analyzed, namely the unexpected inventory accrual component and the unexpected accounts receivable accrual component, i.e. changes in accruals not motivated by corresponding changes in company activity-level. Additionally and for comparison, the accounting accruals are split into expected and unexpected accruals, estimated by the extended Jones model like in both some US-analyses and some international studies of the accrual anomaly phenomenon. It is found that the persistence of earnings is decreasing in the magnitude of the unexpected accrual components of earnings and that the persistence of current earnings performance is particularly decreasing in the magnitude of unexpected changes in inventory. The special accrual parts are related to the perceptions of earnings persistence implicit in the market prices, and it is found that the differences in earnings persistence are not rationally reflected by share price differencesDiscretionary accruals; Earnings management; Earnings Persistence; Accrual anomaly;

Simulation discounted cash flow valuation for internet companies

Discounted cash flow (DCF) is the most accepted approach for company valuation. It is well grounded in theory and practice. However, the DCF approach, which is commonly used for traditional companies valuation, presents a number of serious weaknesses within the Internet companies’ context. One of these weaknesses is tackling the uncertainty that characterize future cash flows of these companies. Specifically DCF assumes that future cash flow streams are highly predictable. The effects of uncertainty are therefore tackled implicitly by discounting the expected value of the cash flows at a risk-adjusted interest rate. However, under uncertainty, future cash flows of these companies can no longer be characterized by a single value but rather by a range of values of its possible consequences. This paper looks at the way in which uncertainty can be incorporated into the traditional DCF approach so that the latter, which is otherwise conceptually sound, becomes relevant. This is done by recognizing that the DCF input variables are uncertain and will have a probability distribution pertaining to each of them. Thus by utilizing a probability-based valuation model (using Monte Carlo Simulation) it is possible to incorporate uncertainty into the analysis and address the shortcomings of the current model. The MC simulation assigns a range of values in order to cope with uncertainty underlies each key cash flow variable. The process leads to a probability distribution of the valuation criterion used, giving investors a quantitative measure of risk involved