On the inevitability of the consistency operator

We examine recursive monotonic functions on the Lindenbaum algebra of $\mathsf{EA}$. We prove that no such function sends every consistent $\varphi$ to a sentence with deductive strength strictly between $\varphi$ and $(\varphi\wedge\mathsf{Con}(\varphi))$. We generalize this result to iterates of consistency into the effective transfinite. We then prove that for any recursive monotonic function $f$, if there is an iterate of $\mathsf{Con}$ that bounds $f$ everywhere, then $f$ must be somewhere equal to an iterate of $\mathsf{Con}$

The Complexity of Orbits of Computably Enumerable Sets

The goal of this paper is to announce there is a single orbit of the c.e. sets with inclusion, \E, such that the question of membership in this orbit is $\Sigma^1_1$-complete. This result and proof have a number of nice corollaries: the Scott rank of \E is \wock +1; not all orbits are elementarily definable; there is no arithmetic description of all orbits of \E; for all finite $\alpha \geq 9$, there is a properly $\Delta^0_\alpha$ orbit (from the proof). A few small corrections made in this versionComment: To appear in the Bulletion of Symbolic Logi

Nonstandard analysis, deformation quantization and some logical aspects of (non)commutative algebraic geometry

This paper surveys results related to well-known works of B. Plotkin and V. Remeslennikov on the edge of algebra, logic and geometry. We start from a brief review of the paper and motivations. The first sections deal with model theory. In Section 2.1 we describe the geometric equivalence, the elementary equivalence, and the isotypicity of algebras. We look at these notions from the positions of universal algebraic geometry and make emphasis on the cases of the first order rigidity. In this setting Plotkin's problem on the structure of automorphisms of (auto)endomorphisms of free objects, and auto-equivalence of categories is pretty natural and important. Section 2.2 is dedicated to particular cases of Plotkin's problem. Section 2.3 is devoted to Plotkin's problem for automorphisms of the group of polynomial symplectomorphisms. This setting has applications to mathematical physics through the use of model theory (non-standard analysis) in the studying of homomorphisms between groups of symplectomorphisms and automorphisms of the Weyl algebra. The last two sections deal with algorithmic problems for noncommutative and commutative algebraic geometry. Section 3.1 is devoted to the Gr\"obner basis in non-commutative situation. Despite the existence of an algorithm for checking equalities, the zero divisors and nilpotency problems are algorithmically unsolvable. Section 3.2 is connected with the problem of embedding of algebraic varieties; a sketch of the proof of its algorithmic undecidability over a field of characteristic zero is given.Comment: In this review we partially used results of arXiv:1512.06533, arXiv:math/0512273, arXiv:1812.01883 and arXiv:1606.01566 and put them in a new contex

Evitable iterates of the consistency operator

Let's fix a reasonable subsystem $T$ of arithmetic; why are natural extensions of $T$ pre-well-ordered by consistency strength? In previous work, an approach to this question was proposed. The goal of this work was to classify the recursive functions that are monotone with respect to the Lindenabum algebra of $T$. According to an optimistic conjecture, roughly, every such function must be equivalent to an iterate $\mathsf{Con}_T^\alpha$ of the consistency operator in the limit. In previous work the author established the first case of this optimistic conjecture; roughly, every recursive monotone function is either as weak as the identity operator in the limit or as strong as $\mathsf{Con}_T$ in the limit. Yet in this note we prove that this optimistic conjecture fails already at the next step; there are recursive monotone functions that are neither as weak as $\mathsf{Con}_T$ in the limit nor as strong as $\mathsf{Con}_T^2$ in the limit. In fact, for every $\alpha$, we produce a function that is cofinally as strong as $\mathsf{Con}^\alpha_T$ yet cofinally as weak as $\mathsf{Con}_T$