Multi-Head Finite Automata: Characterizations, Concepts and Open Problems

Multi-head finite automata were introduced in (Rabin, 1964) and (Rosenberg, 1966). Since that time, a vast literature on computational and descriptional complexity issues on multi-head finite automata documenting the importance of these devices has been developed. Although multi-head finite automata are a simple concept, their computational behavior can be already very complex and leads to undecidable or even non-semi-decidable problems on these devices such as, for example, emptiness, finiteness, universality, equivalence, etc. These strong negative results trigger the study of subclasses and alternative characterizations of multi-head finite automata for a better understanding of the nature of non-recursive trade-offs and, thus, the borderline between decidable and undecidable problems. In the present paper, we tour a fragment of this literature

Descriptional Complexity of Finite Automata -- Selected Highlights

The state complexity, respectively, nondeterministic state complexity of a regular language $L$ is the number of states of the minimal deterministic, respectively, of a minimal nondeterministic finite automaton for $L$. Some of the most studied state complexity questions deal with size comparisons of nondeterministic finite automata of differing degree of ambiguity. More generally, if for a regular language we compare the size of description by a finite automaton and by a more powerful language definition mechanism, such as a context-free grammar, we encounter non-recursive trade-offs. Operational state complexity studies the state complexity of the language resulting from a regularity preserving operation as a function of the complexity of the argument languages. Determining the state complexity of combined operations is generally challenging and for general combinations of operations that include intersection and marked concatenation it is uncomputable

One-Tape Turing Machine Variants and Language Recognition

We present two restricted versions of one-tape Turing machines. Both characterize the class of context-free languages. In the first version, proposed by Hibbard in 1967 and called limited automata, each tape cell can be rewritten only in the first $d$ visits, for a fixed constant $d\geq 2$. Furthermore, for $d=2$ deterministic limited automata are equivalent to deterministic pushdown automata, namely they characterize deterministic context-free languages. Further restricting the possible operations, we consider strongly limited automata. These models still characterize context-free languages. However, the deterministic version is less powerful than the deterministic version of limited automata. In fact, there exist deterministic context-free languages that are not accepted by any deterministic strongly limited automaton.Comment: 20 pages. This article will appear in the Complexity Theory Column of the September 2015 issue of SIGACT New

Finite Models of Splicing and Their Complexity

Durante las dos últimas décadas ha surgido una colaboración estrecha entre informáticos, bioquímicos y biólogos moleculares, que ha dado lugar a la investigación en un área conocida como la computación biomolecular. El trabajo en esta tesis pertenece a este área, y estudia un modelo de cómputo llamado sistema de empalme (splicing system). El empalme es el modelo formal del corte y de la recombinación de las moléculas de ADN bajo la influencia de las enzimas de la restricción.Esta tesis presenta el trabajo original en el campo de los sistemas de empalme, que, como ya indica el título, se puede dividir en dos partes. La primera parte introduce y estudia nuevos modelos finitos de empalme. La segunda investiga aspectos de complejidad (tanto computacional como descripcional) de los sistema de empalme. La principal contribución de la primera parte es que pone en duda la asunción general que una definición finita, más realista de sistemas de empalme es necesariamente débil desde un punto de vista computacional. Estudiamos varios modelos alternativos y demostramos que en muchos casos tienen más poder computacional. La segunda parte de la tesis explora otro territorio. El modelo de empalme se ha estudiado mucho respecto a su poder computacional, pero las consideraciones de complejidad no se han tratado apenas. Introducimos una noción de la complejidad temporal y espacial para los sistemas de empalme. Estas definiciones son utilizadas para definir y para caracterizar las clases de complejidad para los sistemas de empalme. Entre otros resultados, presentamos unas caracterizaciones exactas de las clases de empalme en términos de clases de máquina de Turing conocidas. Después, usando una nueva variante de sistemas de empalme, que acepta lenguajes en lugar de generarlos, demostramos que los sistemas de empalme se pueden usar para resolver problemas. Por último, definimos medidas de complejidad descriptional para los sistemas de empalme. Demostramos que en este respecto los sistemas de empalme finitos tienen buenas propiedades comparadosOver the last two decades, a tight collaboration has emerged between computer scientists, biochemists and molecular biologists, which has spurred research into an area known as DNAComputing (also biomolecular computing). The work in this thesis belongs to this field, and studies a computational model called splicing system. Splicing is the formal model of the cutting and recombination of DNA molecules under the influence of restriction enzymes.This thesis presents original work in the field of splicing systems, which, as the title already indicates, can be roughly divided into two parts: 'Finite models of splicing' on the onehand and 'their complexity' on the other. The main contribution of the first part is that it challenges the general assumption that a finite, more realistic definition of splicing is necessarily weal from a computational point of view. We propose and study various alternative models and show that in most cases they have more computational power, often reaching computational completeness. The second part explores other territory. Splicing research has been mainly focused on computational power, but complexity considerations have hardly been addressed. Here we introduce notions of time and space complexity for splicing systems. These definitions are used to characterize splicing complexity classes in terms of well known Turing machine classes. Then, using a new accepting variant of splicing systems, we show that they can also be used as problem solvers. Finally, we study descriptional complexity. We define measures of descriptional complexity for splicing systems and show that for representing regular languages they have good properties with respect to finite automata, especially in the accepting variant

Some Open Problems Collected During 7th BWMC

A few open problems and research topics collected during the 7th Brain- storming Week on Membrane Computing are briefly presented; further details can be found in the papers included in the volume.Junta de Andalucía P08 – TIC 0420