Proofs for free - parametricity for dependent types

Reynolds' abstraction theorem shows how a typing judgement in System F can be translated into a relational statement (in second order predicate logic) about inhabitants of the type. We obtain a similar result for pure type systems: for any PTS used as a programming language, there is a PTS that can be used as a logic for parametricity. Types in the source PTS are translated to relations (expressed as types) in the target. Similarly, values of a given type are translated to proofs that the values satisfy the relational interpretation. We extend the result to inductive families. We also show that the assumption that every term satisfies the parametricity condition generated by its type is consistent with the generated logic

Parametricity and Dependent Types

Reynolds' abstraction theorem shows how a typing judgement in System F can be translated into a relational statement (in second order predicate logic) about inhabitants of the type. We (in second order predicate logic) about inhabitants of the type. We obtain a similar result for a single lambda calculus (a pure type system), in which terms, types and their relations are expressed. Working within a single system dispenses with the need for an interpretation layer, allowing for an unusually simple presentation. While the unification puts some constraints on the type system (which we spell out), the result applies to many interesting cases, including dependently-typed ones

Generic refinements for behavioral specifications

This thesis investigates the properties of generic refinements of behavioral specifications. At the base of this investigation stands the view from algebraic specification that abstract data types can be modeled as algebras. A specification of a data type is formed from a syntactic part, i.e. a signature detailing the interface of the data type, and a semantic part, i.e. a class of algebras (called its models) that contains the valid implementations of that data type. Typically, the class of algebras that constitutes the semantics of a specification is defined as the class of algebras that satisfy some given set of axioms. The behavioral aspect of a specification comes from relaxing the requirements imposed by axioms, i.e. by allowing in the semantics of a specification not only the algebras that literally satisfy the given axioms, but also those algebras that appear to behave according to those axioms. Several frameworks have been developed to express the adequate notions of what it means to be a behavioral model of a set of axioms, and our choice as the setting for this thesis will be Bidoit and Hennicker’s Constructor-based Observational Logic, abbreviated COL. Using specifications that rely on the behavioral aspects defined by COL we study the properties of generic refinements between specifications. Refinement is a relation between specifications. The refinement of a target specification by a source specification is given by a function that constructs models of the target specification from the models of the source specification. These functions are called constructions and the source and target specifications that they relate are called the context of the refinement. The theory of refinements between algebraic specifications, with or without the behavioral aspect, has been well studied in the literature. Our analysis starts from those studies and adapts them to COL, which is a relatively new framework, and for which refinement has been studied only briefly. The main part of this thesis is formed by the analysis of generic refinements. Generic refinements are represented by constructions that can be used in various contexts, not just in the context of their definition. These constructions provide the basis for modular refinements, i.e. one can use a locally defined construction in a global context in order to refine just a part of a source specification. The ability to use a refinement outside its original context imposes additional requirements on the construction that represents it. An implementer writing such a construction must not use details of the source models that can be contradicted by potential global context requirements. This means, roughly speaking, that he must use only the information available in the source signature and also any a priori assumption that was made about the contexts of use. We look at the basic case of generic refinements that are reusable in every global context, and then we treat a couple of variations, i.e. generic refinements for which an a priori assumption it is made about the nature of their usage contexts. In each of these cases we follow the same pattern of investigation. First we characterize the constructions that ensure reusability by means of preservation of relations, and then, in most cases, we show that such constructions must be definable in terms of their source signature. Throughout the thesis we use an informal analogy between generic (i.e. polymorphic) functions that appear in second order lambda calculus and the generic refinements that we are studying. This connection will enable us to describe some properties of generic refinements that correspond to the properties of polymorphic functions inferred from their types and named “theorems for free” by Wadler. The definability results, the connection between the assumptions made about the usage contexts and the characterizing relations, and the “theorems for free” for behavioral specifications constitute the main contributions of this thesis

Free Theorems in Languages with Real-World Programming Features

Free theorems, type-based assertions about functions, have become a prominent reasoning tool in functional programming languages. But their correct application requires a lot of care. Restrictions arise due to features present in implemented such languages, but not in the language free theorems were originally investigated in. This thesis advances the formal theory behind free theorems w.r.t. the application of such theorems in non-strict functional languages such as Haskell. In particular, the impact of general recursion and forced strict evaluation is investigated. As formal ground, we employ different lambda calculi equipped with a denotational semantics. For a language with general recursion, we develop and implement a counterexample generator that tells if and why restrictions on a certain free theorem arise due to general recursion. If a restriction is necessary, the generator provides a counterexample to the unrestricted free theorem. If not, the generator terminates without returning a counterexample. Thus, we may on the one hand enhance the understanding of restrictions and on the other hand point to cases where restrictions are superfluous. For a language with a strictness primitive, we develop a refined type system that allows to localize the impact of forced strict evaluation. Refined typing results in stronger free theorems and therefore increases the value of the theorems. Moreover, we provide a generator for such stronger theorems. Lastly, we broaden the view on the kind of assertions free theorems provide. For a very simple, strict evaluated, calculus, we enrich free theorems by (runtime) efficiency assertions. We apply the theory to several toy examples. Finally, we investigate the performance gain of the foldr/build program transformation. The latter investigation exemplifies the main application of our theory: Free theorems may not only ensure semantic correctness of program transformations, they may also ensure that a program transformation speeds up a program.Freie Theoreme sind typbasierte Aussagen über Funktionen. Sie dienen als beliebtes Hilfsmittel für gleichungsbasiertes Schließen in funktionalen Sprachen. Jedoch erfordert ihre korrekte Verwendung viel Sorgfalt. Bestimmte Sprachkonstrukte in praxisorientierten Programmiersprachen beschränken freie Theoreme. Anfängliche theoretische Arbeiten diskutieren diese Einschränkungen nicht oder nur teilweise, da sie nur einen reduzierten Sprachumfang betrachten. In dieser Arbeit wird die Theorie freier Theoreme weiterentwickelt. Im Vordergrund steht die Verbesserung der Anwendbarkeit solcher Theoreme in praxisorientierten, „nicht-strikt” auswertenden, funktionalen Programmiersprachen, wie Haskell. Dazu ist eine Erweiterung des formalen Fundaments notwendig. Insbesondere werden die Auswirkungen von allgemeiner Rekursion und selektiv strikter Auswertung untersucht. Als Ausgangspunkt für die Untersuchungen dient jeweils ein mit einer denotationellen Semantik ausgestattetes Lambda-Kalkül. Im Falle allgemeiner Rekursion wird ein Gegenbeispielgenerator entwickelt und implementiert. Ziel ist es zu zeigen ob und warum allgemeine Rekursion bestimmte Einschränkungen verursacht. Wird die Notwendigkeit einer Einschränkung festgestellt, liefert der Generator ein Gegenbeispiel zum unbeschränkten Theorem. Sonst terminiert er ohne ein Beispiel zu liefern. Auf der einen Seite erhöht der Generator somit das Verständnis für Beschränkungen. Auf der anderen Seite deutet er an, dass Beschränkungen teils überflüssig sind. Bezüglich selektiv strikter Auswertung wird in dieser Arbeit ein verfeinertes Typsystem entwickelt, das den Einfluss solcher vom Programmierer erzwungener Auswertung auf freie Theoreme lokal begrenzt. Verfeinerte Typen ermöglichen stärkere, und somit für die Anwendung wertvollere, freie Theoreme. Durch einen online verfügbaren Generator stehen die Theoreme faktisch aufwandsfrei zur Verfügung. Abschließend wird der Blick auf die Art von Aussagen, die freie Theoreme liefern können, erweitert. Für ein sehr einfaches, strikt auswertendes, Kalkül werden freie Theoreme mit Aussagen über Programmeffizienz bzgl. der Laufzeit angereichert. Die Anwendbarkeit der Theorie wird an einigen sehr einfachen Beispielen verifiziert. Danach wird die Auswirkung der foldr/build- Programmtransformation auf die Programmlaufzeit betrachtet. Diese Betrachtung steckt das Anwendungsziel ab: Freie Theoreme sollen nicht nur die semantische Korrektheit von Programmtransformationen verifizieren, sie sollen außerdem zeigen, wann Transformationen die Performanz eines Programms erhöhen