119 research outputs found

    Optimal Torque-Vectoring Control Strategy for Energy Efficiency and Vehicle Dynamic Improvement of Battery Electric Vehicles with Multiple Motors

    Get PDF
    Electric vehicles comprising multiple motors allow the individual wheel torque allocation, i.e. torque-vectoring. Powertrain configurations with multiple motors provide additional degree of freedom to improve system level efficiencies while ensuring handling performances and active safety. However, most of the works available on this topic do not simultaneously optimize both vehicle dynamic performance and energy efficiency while considering the real-time implementability of the controller. In this work, a new and systematic approach in designing, modeling, and simulating the main layers of a torque-vectoring control framework is introduced. The high level control combines the actions of an adaptive Linear Quadratic Regulator (A-LQR) and of a feedforward controller, to shape the steady-state and transient vehicle response by generating the reference yaw moment. A novel energy efficient torque allocation method is proposed as a low level controller. The torque is allocated on each wheel by solving a quadratic programming problem. The latter is solved in real-time to guarantee the desired yaw moment and the requested driver power demand while minimizing the system losses. The objective function of the quadratic problem accounts for the efficiency map of the electric machine as well as the dissipations due to tire slip phenomena. The torque-vectoring is evaluated in a co-simulation environment. Matlab/Simulink is used for the control strategy and VI-CarRealTime for the vehicle model and driver. The vehicle model represents a high performance pure electric SUV with four e-motors. The performance of the proposed controller is assessed using open loop maneuvers and in closed loop track lap scenarios. The results demonstrate that the proposed controller enhances the vehicleโ€™s performance in terms of handling. Additionally, a significant improvement in energy saving in a wide range of lateral acceleration conditions is: presented. Moreover, the control strategy is validated using rapid control prototyping, thus guaranteeing a deterministic real-time implementation

    A state-of-the-art review on torque distribution strategies aimed at enhancing energy efficiency for fully electric vehicles with independently actuated drivetrains

    Get PDF
    ยฉ 2019, Levrotto and Bella. All rights reserved. Electric vehicles are the future of private passenger transportation. However, there are still several technological barriers that hinder the large scale adoption of electric vehicles. In particular, their limited autonomy motivates studies on methods for improving the energy efficiency of electric vehicles so as to make them more attractive to the market. This paper provides a concise review on the current state-of-the-art of torque distribution strategies aimed at enhancing energy efficiency for fully electric vehicles with independently actuated drivetrains (FEVIADs). Starting from the operating principles, which include the "control allocation" problem, the peculiarities of each proposed solution are illustrated. All the existing techniques are categorized based on a selection of parameters deemed relevant to provide a comprehensive overview and understanding of the topic. Finally, future concerns and research perspectives for FEVIAD are discussed

    Integration of Active Systems for a Global Chassis Control Design

    Get PDF
    Vehicle chassis control active systems (braking, suspension, steering and driveline), from the first ABS/ESC control unit to the current advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), are progressively revolutionizing the way of thinking and designing the vehicle, improving its interaction with the surrounding world (V2V and V2X) and have led to excellent results in terms of safety and performances (dynamic behavior and drivability). They are usually referred as intelligent vehicles due to a software/hardware architecture able to assist the driver for achieving specific safety margin and/or optimal vehicle dynamic behavior. Moreover, industrial and academic communities agree that these technologies will progress till the diffusion of the so called autonomous cars which are able to drive robustly in a wide range of traffic scenarios. Different autonomous vehicles are already available in Europe, Japan and United States and several solutions have been proposed for smart cities and/or small public area like university campus. In this context, the present research activity aims at improving safety, comfort and performances through the integration of global active chassis control: the purposes are to study, design and implement control strategies to support the driver for achieving one or more final target among safety, comfort and performance. Specifically, the vehicle subsystems that are involved in the present research for active systems development are the steering system, the propulsion system, the transmission and the braking system. The thesis is divided into three sections related to different applications of active systems that, starting from a robust theoretical design procedure, are strongly supported by objective experimental results obtained fromHardware In the Loop (HIL) test rigs and/or proving ground testing sessions. The first chapter is dedicated to one of the most discussed topic about autonomous driving due to its impact from the social point of view and in terms of human error mitigation when the driver is not prompt enough. In particular, it is here analyzed the automated steering control which is already implemented for automatic parking and that could represent also a key element for conventional passenger car in emergency situation where a braking intervention is not enough for avoiding an imminent collision. The activity is focused on different steering controllers design and their implementation for an autonomous vehicle; an obstacle collision avoidance adaptation is introduced for future implementations. Three different controllers, Proportional Derivative (PD), PD+Feedforward (FF) e PD+Integral Sliding Mode (ISM), are designed for tracking a reference trajectory that can be modified in real-time for obstacle avoidance purposes. Furthermore, PD+FF and PD+ISM logic are able to improve the tracking performances of automated steering during cornering maneuvers, relevant fromthe collision avoidance point of view. Path tracking control and its obstacle avoidance enhancement is also shown during experimental tests executed in a proving ground through its implementation for an autonomous vehicle demonstrator. Even if the activity is presented for an autonomous vehicle, the active control can be developed also for a conventional vehicle equipped with an Electronic Power Steering (EPS) or Steer-by-wire architectures. The second chapter describes a Torque Vectoring (TV) control strategy, applied to a Fully Electric Vehicle (FEV) with four independent electric motor (one for each wheel), that aims to optimize the lateral vehicle behavior by a proper electric motor torque regulation. A yaw rate controller is presented and designed in order to achieve a desired steady-state lateral behaviour of the car (handling task). Furthermore, a sideslip angle controller is also integrated to preserve vehicle stability during emergency situations (safety task). LQR, LQR+FF and ISM strategies are formulated and explained for yaw rate and concurrent yaw rate/sideslip angle control techniques also comparing their advantages and weakness points. The TV strategy is implemented and calibrated on a FEV demonstrator by executing experimental maneuvers (step steer, skid pad, lane change and sequence of step steers) thus proving the efficacy of the proposed controller and the safety contribution guaranteed by the sideslip control. The TV could be also applied for internal combustion engine driven vehicles by installing specific torque vectoring differentials, able to distribute the torque generated by the engine to each wheel independently. The TV strategy evaluated in the second chapter can be influenced by the presence of a transmission between themotor (or the engine) and wheels (where the torque control is supposed to be designed): in addition to the mechanical delay introduced by transmission components, the presence of gears backlashes can provoke undesired noises and vibrations in presence of torque sign inversion. The last chapter is thus related to a new method for noises and vibration attenuation for a Dual Clutch Transmission (DCT). This is achieved in a new way by integrating the powertrain control with the braking system control, which are historically and conventionally analyzed and designed separately. It is showed that a torsional preload effect can be obtained on transmission components by increasing the wheel torque and concurrently applying a braking wheel torque. For this reason, a pressure following controller is presented and validated through a Hardware In the Loop (HIL) test rig in order to track a reference value of braking torque thus ensuring the desired preload effect and noises reduction. Experimental results demonstrates the efficacy of the controller, also opening new scenario for global chassis control design. Finally, some general conclusions are drawn and possible future activities and recommendations are proposed for further investigations or improvements with respect to the results shown in the present work

    Advanced electric vehicle components for long-distance daily trips

    Get PDF
    This paper introduces a holistic engineering approach for the design of an electric sport utility vehicle focused on the reliable capability of long-distance daily trips. This approach is targeting integration of advanced powertrain and chassis components to achieve energy-efficient driving dynamics through manifold contribution of their improved functions. The powertrain layout of the electric vehicle under discussion is designed for an e-traction axle system including in-wheel motors and the dual inverter. The main elements of the chassis layout are the electro-magnetic suspension and the hybrid brake-by-wire system with electro-hydraulic actuators on the front axle and the electro-mechanical actuators on the rear axle. All the listed powertrain and chassis components are united under an integrated vehicle dynamics and energy management control strategy that is also outlined in the paper. The study is illustrated with the experimental results confirming the achieved high performance on the electric vehicle systems level

    STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN INTEGRATED CHASSIS CONTROL FOR GROUND VEHICLES

    Get PDF
    Many modern ground vehicles feature state-of-the-art powertrain, braking and suspension control systems. These technologies are rapidly filtering through to heavy and off-road vehicles. The drawback of many of these systems is that their operation is largely considered only in stand-alone mode. The paper introduces up-to-date and coming ground vehicle technology related to the integration and advanced control of active chassis control systems. In particular, addressing the task of coordinated subsystems control can provide simultaneous enhancements in traction and braking performance, handling, off-road mobility, driving comfort and energy efficiency. A special focus in the paper is given to coordinated operation of brake control, active suspension, and dynamic tyre pressure management. The influence of each particular subsystem on the vehicle safety, off-road mobility and ride comfort is evaluated in simulation. It is further described and confirmed in simulation how the integrated chassis control (ICC) can simultaneously improve each of these vehicle characteristics. From the hardware viewpoint, a variant of ground vehicle architecture with aforementioned integrated active chassis systems is introduced. This architecture and its corresponding implementation on a sport utility vehicle are currently investigated within the European Union-funded Horizon 2020 consortium EVE. The work presented is a collaborative effort among several ISTVS members across the globe

    Model predictive torque vectoring control with active trail-braking for electric vehicles

    Get PDF
    In this work we present the development of a torque vectoring controller for electric vehicles. The proposed controller distributes drive/brake torque between the four wheels to achieve the desired handling response and, in addition, intervenes in the longitudinal dynamics in cases where the turning radius demand is infeasible at the speed at which the vehicle is traveling. The proposed controller is designed in both the Linear and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control framework, which have shown great promise for real time implementation the last decades. Hence, we compare both controllers and observe their ability to behave under critical nonlinearities of the vehicle dynamics in limit handling conditions and constraints from the actuators and tyre-road interaction. We implement the controllers in a realistic, high fidelity simulation environment to demonstrate their performance using CarMaker and Simulink

    Energy efficient torque vectoring control

    Get PDF
    Tire forces are at the heart of the dynamic qualities of vehicles. With the advent of electric vehicles the precise and accurate control of the traction and braking forces at the individual wheel becomes a possibility and a reality outside test labs and virtual proving grounds. Benefits of individual wheel torque control, or torque-vectoring, in terms of vehicle dynamics behavior have been well documented in the literature. However, very few studies exist which analyze the individual wheel torque control integrated with vehicle efficiency considerations. This paper focuses on this aspect and discusses the possibilities and benefits of integrated, energy efficient torque vectoring control. Experiments with a four-wheel-drive electric vehicle show that considerable energy savings can be achieved by considering drivetrain and tire power losses through energy efficient torque vectoring control

    Optimal torque vectoring control strategies for stabilisation of electric vehicles at the limits of handling

    Get PDF
    The study of chassis control has been a major research area in the automotive industry and academia for more than fifty years now. Among the popular methods used to actively control the dynamics of a vehicle, torque vectoring, the method of controlling both the direction and the magnitude of the torque on the wheels, is of particular interest. Such a method can alter the vehicleโ€™s behaviour in a positive way under both sub-limit and limit handling conditions and has become even more relevant in the case of an electric vehicle equipped with multiple electric motors. Torque vectoring has been so far employed mainly in lateral vehicle dynamics control applications, with the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle remaining under the full authority of the driver. Nevertheless, it has been also recognised that active control of the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle can improve vehicle stability in limit handling situations. A characteristic example of this is the case where the driver misjudges the entry speed into a corner and the vehicle starts to deviate from its path, a situation commonly referred to as a โ€˜terminal understeerโ€™ condition. Use of combined longitudinal and lateral control in such scenarios have been already proposed in the literature, but these solutions are mainly based on heuristic approaches that also neglect the strong coupling of longitudinal and lateral dynamics in limit handling situations. The main aim of this project is to develop a real-time implementable multivariable control strategy to stabilise the vehicle at the limits of handling in an optimal way using torque vectoring via the two independently controlled electric motors on the rear axle of an electric vehicle. To this end, after reviewing the most important contributions in the control of lateral and/or longitudinal vehicle dynamics with a particular focus on the limit handling solutions, a realistic vehicle reference behaviour near the limit of lateral acceleration is derived. An unconstrained optimal control strategy is then developed for terminal understeer mitigation. The importance of constraining both the vehicle state and the control inputs when the vehicle operates at the limits of handling is shown by developing a constrained linear optimal control framework, while the effect of using a constrained nonlinear optimal control framework instead is subsequently examined next. Finally an optimal estimation strategy for providing the necessary vehicle state information to the proposed optimal control strategies is constructed, assuming that only common vehicle sensors are available. All the developed optimal control strategies are assessed not only in terms of performance but also execution time, so to make sure they are implementable in real time on a typical Electronic Control Unit

    ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธํœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์ˆ˜.์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(ESC)์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์•…์ฒœํ›„๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ์ธ ์นด ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ๋™์ œ์–ด์˜ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ž…์€ ์šด์ „์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋งŒ๋„ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋™ํ™”์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ์ž๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜์—ญ์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ฃผํ–‰ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐ ํœ ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ข…, ํšก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์–ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ ํšŒ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง์ œ์–ด์— ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋†’์€ ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋ฅœ์— 2๊ฐœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์–ธ๋”์Šคํ‹ฐ์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์  ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฑ„ํ„ฐ๋ง ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณผ๋„ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์‹ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ISO ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์š” ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์™€ ํšก ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ MASMC (Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 4๋ฅœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋™์  ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „ํ›„๋ฅœ ํƒ€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ฝ”๋„ˆ๋ง ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์€ ์ ์‘์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์•ˆ์ „๋ชจ๋“œ์™€ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ๋ชจ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ, ์šด์ „์ž๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ๊ธˆ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด MASMC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ „๋™ํ™” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์— ์ฃผํ–‰์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ์จ, ์ „์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.In the last ten decades, vehicle stability control systems have been dramatically developed and adapted in many commercial vehicles to avoid fatal crashes. Significantly, ESC (Electric Stability Control) system can help escape the accident from unstable driving conditions with dangerous roads such as slippery roads due to inclement weather conditions. However, for the high performed vehicle, frequent intervention from ESC reduces the pleasure of fun-to-drive. Recently, the development of traction control technologies has been taking place with that of the electrification of vehicles. The IWMs (In-Wheel Motor system), which is one of the systems that can apply independent drive of each wheel, for the limit handling characteristics, which are the operation areas of the ESC, is introduced for the control that enables the lateral characteristics of the vehicle dynamics. Firstly, the automated drift control algorithm can be proposed for the nonlinear limit handling condition of vehicles. This approach can give an insight of fun-to-drive mode to TV (Torque Vector) control scheme, but also the stability control of high sideslip angle of the vehicle on slippery roads. Secondly, using IWMs system with front two motors, understeer gradient of vehicle, which is the unique characteristics of vehicle can be used for the proposed control strategy. A new transient parameter is formulated to be acquired rapid response of controller and reducing chattering effects. Simulation and vehicle tests are conducted for validation of TV control algorithm with steady-state and transient ISO-based tests. Finally, dynamic torque vectoring control with a four-wheel motor system with Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control (MASMC) approach, which is composed of a yaw rate controller and sideslip angle controller, is introduced. Highly nonlinear characteristics, cornering stiffnesses of front and rear tires are estimated by adaptation law with measuring data. Consequently, there are two types of driving modes, the safety mode and the dynamic mode. MASMC algorithm can be found and validated by simulation in torque vectoring technology to improve the handling performance of fully electric vehicles.Chapter 1 Introduction 7 1.1. Background and Motivation 7 1.2. Literature review 11 1.3. Thesis Objectives 15 1.4. Thesis Outline 15 Chapter 2 Vehicle dynamic control at limit handling 17 2.1. Vehicle Model and Analysis 17 2.1.1. Lateral dynamics of vehicle 17 2.1.2. Longitudinal dynamics of vehicle 20 2.2. Tire Model 24 2.3. Analysis of vehicle drift for fun-to-drive 28 2.4. Designing A Controller for Automated Drift 34 2.4.1. Lateral controller 35 2.4.2. Longitudinal Controller 37 2.4.3. Stability Analysis 39 2.4.4. Validation with simulation and test 40 Chapter 3 Torque Vectoring Control with Front Two Motor In-Wheel Vehicles 47 3.1. Dynamic Torque Vectoring Control 48 3.1.1. In-wheel motor system (IWMs) 48 3.1.2. Dynamic system modeling 49 3.1.3. Designing controller 53 3.2. Validation with Simulation and Experiment 59 3.2.1. Simulation 59 3.2.2. Vehicle Experiment 64 Chapter 4 Dynamic handling control for Four-wheel Drive In-Wheel platform 75 4.1. Vehicle System Modeling 76 4.2. Motion Control based on MASMC 78 4.2.1. Yaw motion controller for the inner ASMC 80 4.2.2. Sideslip angle controller for the outer ASMC 84 4.3. Optimal Torque Distribution (OTD) 88 4.3.1. Constraints of dynamics 88 4.3.2. Optimal torque distribution law 90 4.4. Validation with Simulation 91 4.4.1. Simulation setup 91 4.4.2. Simulation results 92 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future works 104 5.1 Conclusion 104 5.2 Future works 106 Bibliography 108 Abstract in Korean 114๋ฐ•
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore