47,357 research outputs found
Jan Dejnozka, âThe Concept of Relevance and the Logic Diagram Traditionâ, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2012
Jan Dejnozka, The Concept of Relevance and the Logic Diagram Tradition, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2012, 170 pp., ISBN-10 1475071094, ISBN-13 978-1475071092
Real Islamic Logic
Four options for assigning a meaning to Islamic Logic are surveyed including
a new proposal for an option named "Real Islamic Logic" (RIL). That approach to
Islamic Logic should serve modern Islamic objectives in a way comparable to the
functionality of Islamic Finance. The prospective role of RIL is analyzed from
several perspectives: (i) parallel distributed systems design, (ii) reception
by a community structured audience, (iii) informal logic and applied
non-classical logics, and (iv) (in)tractability and artificial intelligence
Objectivity: its meaning, its limitations, its fateful omissions
In this text, we explore the guiding thread of the volume "Objectivity after Kant" by first discussing how the main question pertaining to transcendental objectivity arose at the Centre for Critical Philosophy. This exposition takes the form of a microhistorical genealogy, from which the main ideas pursued in the research conducted at this Centre can be distilled. In the second part, we briefly sketch how the different contributors have addressed this question. Its purpose is to facilitate the readerâs navigation through the variety of topics and perspectives addressed throughout this volume, and incite further reflection on the central issue it pursues
Recent Conceptual Consequences of Loop Quantum Gravity. Part II: Holistic Aspects
Based on the foundational aspects which have been discussed as consequences
of ongoing research on loop quantum gravity in the first part of this paper,
the holistic aspects of the latter are discussed in this second part, aiming at
a consistent and systematic approach to eventually model a hierarchically
ordered architecture of the world which is encompassing all of what there
actually is. The idea is to clarify the explicit relationship between physics
and philosophy on the one hand, and philosophy and the sciences in general, on
the other. It is shown that the ontological determination of worldliness is
practically identical with its epistemological determination so that the
(scientific) activity of modelling and representing the world can be visualized
itself as a (worldly) mode of being.Comment: 20 page
Recommended from our members
Thinking as mental model-building: a Piagetian-cum-mechanistic explanation of the 'engram'
Piaget (like Skinner) appears to deny the relevance or possibility of describing thought in mechanistic terms. Nevertheless, this paper attempts to outline one way in which this might be done for Piaget's concepts.
Three domains or "worlds" are considered (following both Piaget and Popper); Reality and the senses, thought proper, and a symbolic domain (divided into [a] internal, and [b] external).
Within the second domain are linear codings (pre-set but changeable) which can comprise "schemes" when activated synchonously in sufficient numbers. Non-linear schemes and schemata are explicable in tems of "sub-programming" and "cross-referencing".
Elementary units for schemata may be scheme-elements (or ensembles of them) which have become more or less permanently stabilized due to their self-sustaining cross-references. These inhabit the symbolic domain ("world 3a")
The Semantic Web: Apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics?
This article discusses what kind of entity the proposed Semantic Web (SW) is, principally by reference to the relationship of natural language structure to knowledge representation (KR). There are three distinct views on this issue. The first is that the SW is basically a renaming of the traditional AI KR task, with all its problems and challenges. The second view is that the SW will be, at a minimum, the World Wide Web with its constituent documents annotated so as to yield their content, or meaning structure, more directly. This view makes natural language processing central as the procedural bridge from texts to KR, usually via some form of automated information extraction. The third view is that the SW is about trusted databases as the foundation of a system of Web processes and services. There's also a fourth view, which is much more difficult to define and discuss: If the SW just keeps moving as an engineering development and is lucky, then real problems won't arise. This article is part of a special issue called Semantic Web Update
Recommended from our members
Systems thinking and practice for action research
This chapter offers some grounding in systems thinking and practice for doing action research. There are different traditions within systems thinking and practice which, if appreciated, can become part of the repertoire for practice by action researchers. After exploring some of these lineages the differences between systemic and systematic thinking and practice are elucidated â these are the two adjectives that come from the word 'system', but they describe quite different understandings and practices. These differences are associated with epistemological awareness and distinguishing systemic action research from action research. Finally, some advantages for action research practice from engaging with systems thinking and practice are discussed
- âŠ