16,119 research outputs found
Progress on Polynomial Identity Testing - II
We survey the area of algebraic complexity theory; with the focus being on
the problem of polynomial identity testing (PIT). We discuss the key ideas that
have gone into the results of the last few years.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figure, surve
Sparse multivariate polynomial interpolation in the basis of Schubert polynomials
Schubert polynomials were discovered by A. Lascoux and M. Sch\"utzenberger in
the study of cohomology rings of flag manifolds in 1980's. These polynomials
generalize Schur polynomials, and form a linear basis of multivariate
polynomials. In 2003, Lenart and Sottile introduced skew Schubert polynomials,
which generalize skew Schur polynomials, and expand in the Schubert basis with
the generalized Littlewood-Richardson coefficients.
In this paper we initiate the study of these two families of polynomials from
the perspective of computational complexity theory. We first observe that skew
Schubert polynomials, and therefore Schubert polynomials, are in \CountP
(when evaluating on non-negative integral inputs) and \VNP.
Our main result is a deterministic algorithm that computes the expansion of a
polynomial of degree in in the basis of Schubert
polynomials, assuming an oracle computing Schubert polynomials. This algorithm
runs in time polynomial in , , and the bit size of the expansion. This
generalizes, and derandomizes, the sparse interpolation algorithm of symmetric
polynomials in the Schur basis by Barvinok and Fomin (Advances in Applied
Mathematics, 18(3):271--285). In fact, our interpolation algorithm is general
enough to accommodate any linear basis satisfying certain natural properties.
Applications of the above results include a new algorithm that computes the
generalized Littlewood-Richardson coefficients.Comment: 20 pages; some typos correcte
Syndrome decoding of Reed-Muller codes and tensor decomposition over finite fields
Reed-Muller codes are some of the oldest and most widely studied
error-correcting codes, of interest for both their algebraic structure as well
as their many algorithmic properties. A recent beautiful result of Saptharishi,
Shpilka and Volk showed that for binary Reed-Muller codes of length and
distance , one can correct random errors
in time (which is well beyond the worst-case error
tolerance of ).
In this paper, we consider the problem of `syndrome decoding' Reed-Muller
codes from random errors. More specifically, given the
-bit long syndrome vector of a codeword corrupted in
random coordinates, we would like to compute the
locations of the codeword corruptions. This problem turns out to be equivalent
to a basic question about computing tensor decomposition of random low-rank
tensors over finite fields.
Our main result is that syndrome decoding of Reed-Muller codes (and the
equivalent tensor decomposition problem) can be solved efficiently, i.e., in
time. We give two algorithms for this problem:
1. The first algorithm is a finite field variant of a classical algorithm for
tensor decomposition over real numbers due to Jennrich. This also gives an
alternate proof for the main result of Saptharishi et al.
2. The second algorithm is obtained by implementing the steps of the
Berlekamp-Welch-style decoding algorithm of Saptharishi et al. in
sublinear-time. The main new ingredient is an algorithm for solving certain
kinds of systems of polynomial equations.Comment: 24 page
Polynomial Size Analysis of First-Order Shapely Functions
We present a size-aware type system for first-order shapely function
definitions. Here, a function definition is called shapely when the size of the
result is determined exactly by a polynomial in the sizes of the arguments.
Examples of shapely function definitions may be implementations of matrix
multiplication and the Cartesian product of two lists. The type system is
proved to be sound w.r.t. the operational semantics of the language. The type
checking problem is shown to be undecidable in general. We define a natural
syntactic restriction such that the type checking becomes decidable, even
though size polynomials are not necessarily linear or monotonic. Furthermore,
we have shown that the type-inference problem is at least semi-decidable (under
this restriction). We have implemented a procedure that combines run-time
testing and type-checking to automatically obtain size dependencies. It
terminates on total typable function definitions.Comment: 35 pages, 1 figur
- …