Tabling and Answer Subsumption for Reasoning on Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions

Abstract Probabilistic Logic Programming is an active field of research, with many proposals for languages, semantics and reasoning algorithms. One such proposal, Logic Programming with Annotated Disjunctions (LPADs) represents probabilistic information in a sound and simple way. This paper presents the algorithm "Probabilistic Inference with Tabling and Answer subsumption" (PITA) for computing the probability of queries. Answer subsumption is a feature of tabling that allows the combination of different answers for the same subgoal in the case in which a partial order can be defined over them. We have applied it in our case since probabilistic explanations (stored as BDDs in PITA) possess a natural lattice structure. PITA has been implemented in XSB and compared with ProbLog, cplint and CVE. The results show that, in almost all cases, PITA is able to solve larger problems and is faster than competing algorithms

The PITA System: Tabling and Answer Subsumption for Reasoning under Uncertainty

Many real world domains require the representation of a measure of uncertainty. The most common such representation is probability, and the combination of probability with logic programs has given rise to the field of Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP), leading to languages such as the Independent Choice Logic, Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions (LPADs), Problog, PRISM and others. These languages share a similar distribution semantics, and methods have been devised to translate programs between these languages. The complexity of computing the probability of queries to these general PLP programs is very high due to the need to combine the probabilities of explanations that may not be exclusive. As one alternative, the PRISM system reduces the complexity of query answering by restricting the form of programs it can evaluate. As an entirely different alternative, Possibilistic Logic Programs adopt a simpler metric of uncertainty than probability. Each of these approaches -- general PLP, restricted PLP, and Possibilistic Logic Programming -- can be useful in different domains depending on the form of uncertainty to be represented, on the form of programs needed to model problems, and on the scale of the problems to be solved. In this paper, we show how the PITA system, which originally supported the general PLP language of LPADs, can also efficiently support restricted PLP and Possibilistic Logic Programs. PITA relies on tabling with answer subsumption and consists of a transformation along with an API for library functions that interface with answer subsumption

Probabilistic inference in SWI-Prolog

Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP) emerged as one of the most prominent approaches to cope with real-world domains. The distribution semantics is one of most used in PLP, as it is followed by many languages, such as Independent Choice Logic, PRISM, pD, Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions (LPADs) and ProbLog. A possible system that allows performing inference on LPADs is PITA, which transforms the input LPAD into a Prolog program containing calls to library predicates for handling Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs). In particular, BDDs are used to compactly encode explanations for goals and efficiently compute their probability. However, PITA needs mode-directed tabling (also called tabling with answer subsumption), which has been implemented in SWI-Prolog only recently. This paper shows how SWI-Prolog has been extended to include correct answer subsumption and how the PITA transformation has been changed to use SWI-Prolog implementation

Probabilistic Programming Concepts

A multitude of different probabilistic programming languages exists today, all extending a traditional programming language with primitives to support modeling of complex, structured probability distributions. Each of these languages employs its own probabilistic primitives, and comes with a particular syntax, semantics and inference procedure. This makes it hard to understand the underlying programming concepts and appreciate the differences between the different languages. To obtain a better understanding of probabilistic programming, we identify a number of core programming concepts underlying the primitives used by various probabilistic languages, discuss the execution mechanisms that they require and use these to position state-of-the-art probabilistic languages and their implementation. While doing so, we focus on probabilistic extensions of logic programming languages such as Prolog, which have been developed since more than 20 years

Mode-Directed Tabling and Applications in the YapTab System

Tabling is an implementation technique that solves some limitations of Prolog\u27s operational semantics in dealing with recursion and redundant sub-computations. Tabling works by memorizing generated answers and then by reusing them on similar calls that appear during the resolution process. In a traditional tabling system, all the arguments of a tabled subgoal call are considered when storing answers into the table space. Traditional tabling systems are thus very good for problems that require finding all answers. Mode-directed tabling is an extension to the tabling technique that supports the definition of selective criteria for specifying how answers are inserted into the table space. Implementations of mode-directed tabling are already available in systems like ALS-Prolog, B-Prolog and XSB. In this paper, we propose a more general approach to the declaration and use of mode-directed tabling, implemented on top of the YapTab tabling system, and we show applications of our approach to problems involving Justification, Preferences and Answer Subsumption

Nesting Probabilistic Inference

When doing inference in ProbLog, a probabilistic extension of Prolog, we extend SLD resolution with some additional bookkeeping. This additional information is used to compute the probabilistic results for a probabilistic query. In Prolog's SLD, goals are nested very naturally. In ProbLog's SLD, nesting probabilistic queries interferes with the probabilistic bookkeeping. In order to support nested probabilistic inference we propose the notion of a parametrised ProbLog engine. Nesting becomes possible by suspending and resuming instances of ProbLog engines. With our approach we realise several extensions of ProbLog such as meta-calls, negation, and answers of probabilistic goals.Comment: Online Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Implementation of Constraint LOgic Programming Systems (CICLOPS 2011), Lexington, KY, U.S.A., July 10, 201