45 research outputs found
Swap Bribery
In voting theory, bribery is a form of manipulative behavior in which an
external actor (the briber) offers to pay the voters to change their votes in
order to get her preferred candidate elected. We investigate a model of bribery
where the price of each vote depends on the amount of change that the voter is
asked to implement. Specifically, in our model the briber can change a voter's
preference list by paying for a sequence of swaps of consecutive candidates.
Each swap may have a different price; the price of a bribery is the sum of the
prices of all swaps that it involves. We prove complexity results for this
model, which we call swap bribery, for a broad class of election systems,
including variants of approval and k-approval, Borda, Copeland, and maximin.Comment: 17 page
Multivariate Analyis of Swap Bribery
We consider the computational complexity of a problem modeling bribery in the
context of voting systems. In the scenario of Swap Bribery, each voter assigns
a certain price for swapping the positions of two consecutive candidates in his
preference ranking. The question is whether it is possible, without exceeding a
given budget, to bribe the voters in a way that the preferred candidate wins in
the election. We initiate a parameterized and multivariate complexity analysis
of Swap Bribery, focusing on the case of k-approval. We investigate how
different cost functions affect the computational complexity of the problem. We
identify a special case of k-approval for which the problem can be solved in
polynomial time, whereas we prove NP-hardness for a slightly more general
scenario. We obtain fixed-parameter tractability as well as W[1]-hardness
results for certain natural parameters.Comment: 20 pages. Conference version published at IPEC 201
Complexity of Manipulation, Bribery, and Campaign Management in Bucklin and Fallback Voting
A central theme in computational social choice is to study the extent to
which voting systems computationally resist manipulative attacks seeking to
influence the outcome of elections, such as manipulation (i.e., strategic
voting), control, and bribery. Bucklin and fallback voting are among the voting
systems with the broadest resistance (i.e., NP-hardness) to control attacks.
However, only little is known about their behavior regarding manipulation and
bribery attacks. We comprehensively investigate the computational resistance of
Bucklin and fallback voting for many of the common manipulation and bribery
scenarios; we also complement our discussion by considering several campaign
management problems for Bucklin and fallback.Comment: 28 page
Parameterized Algorithmics for Computational Social Choice: Nine Research Challenges
Computational Social Choice is an interdisciplinary research area involving
Economics, Political Science, and Social Science on the one side, and
Mathematics and Computer Science (including Artificial Intelligence and
Multiagent Systems) on the other side. Typical computational problems studied
in this field include the vulnerability of voting procedures against attacks,
or preference aggregation in multi-agent systems. Parameterized Algorithmics is
a subfield of Theoretical Computer Science seeking to exploit meaningful
problem-specific parameters in order to identify tractable special cases of in
general computationally hard problems. In this paper, we propose nine of our
favorite research challenges concerning the parameterized complexity of
problems appearing in this context
On the Hardness of Bribery Variants in Voting with CP-Nets
We continue previous work by Mattei et al. (Mattei, N., Pini, M., Rossi, F.,
Venable, K.: Bribery in voting with CP-nets. Ann. of Math. and Artif. Intell.
pp. 1--26 (2013)) in which they study the computational complexity of bribery
schemes when voters have conditional preferences that are modeled by CP-nets.
For most of the cases they considered, they could show that the bribery problem
is solvable in polynomial time. Some cases remained open---we solve two of them
and extend the previous results to the case that voters are weighted. Moreover,
we consider negative (weighted) bribery in CP-nets, when the briber is not
allowed to pay voters to vote for his preferred candidate.Comment: improved readability; identified Cheapest Subsets to be the
enumeration variant of K.th Largest Subset, so we renamed it to K-Smallest
Subsets and point to the literatur; some more typos fixe
Voting and Bribing in Single-Exponential Time
We introduce a general problem about bribery in voting systems. In the R-Multi-Bribery problem, the goal is to bribe a set of voters at minimum cost such that a desired candidate wins the manipulated election under the voting rule R. Voters assign prices for withdrawing their vote, for swapping the positions of two consecutive candidates in their preference order, and for perturbing their approval count for a candidate.
As our main result, we show that R-Multi-Bribery is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the number of candidates for many natural voting rules R, including Kemeny rule, all scoring protocols, maximin rule, Bucklin rule, fallback rule, SP-AV, and any C1 rule. In particular, our result resolves the parameterized of R-Swap Bribery for all those voting rules, thereby solving a long-standing open problem and "Challenge #2" of the 9 Challenges in computational social choice by Bredereck et al.
Further, our algorithm runs in single-exponential time for arbitrary cost; it thus improves the earlier double-exponential time algorithm by Dorn and Schlotter that is restricted to the unit-cost case for all scoring protocols, the maximin rule, and Bucklin rule