14,736 research outputs found
Text Summarization Techniques: A Brief Survey
In recent years, there has been a explosion in the amount of text data from a
variety of sources. This volume of text is an invaluable source of information
and knowledge which needs to be effectively summarized to be useful. In this
review, the main approaches to automatic text summarization are described. We
review the different processes for summarization and describe the effectiveness
and shortcomings of the different methods.Comment: Some of references format have update
A Novel ILP Framework for Summarizing Content with High Lexical Variety
Summarizing content contributed by individuals can be challenging, because
people make different lexical choices even when describing the same events.
However, there remains a significant need to summarize such content. Examples
include the student responses to post-class reflective questions, product
reviews, and news articles published by different news agencies related to the
same events. High lexical diversity of these documents hinders the system's
ability to effectively identify salient content and reduce summary redundancy.
In this paper, we overcome this issue by introducing an integer linear
programming-based summarization framework. It incorporates a low-rank
approximation to the sentence-word co-occurrence matrix to intrinsically group
semantically-similar lexical items. We conduct extensive experiments on
datasets of student responses, product reviews, and news documents. Our
approach compares favorably to a number of extractive baselines as well as a
neural abstractive summarization system. The paper finally sheds light on when
and why the proposed framework is effective at summarizing content with high
lexical variety.Comment: Accepted for publication in the journal of Natural Language
Engineering, 201
Do peers see more in a paper than its authors?
Recent years have shown a gradual shift in the content of biomedical publications that is freely accessible, from titles and abstracts to full text. This has enabled new forms of automatic text analysis and has given rise to some interesting questions: How informative is the abstract compared to the full-text? What important information in the full-text is not present in the abstract? What should a good summary contain that is not already in the abstract? Do authors and peers see an article differently? We answer these questions by comparing the information content of the abstract to that in citances-sentences containing citations to that article. We contrast the important points of an article as judged by its authors versus as seen by peers. Focusing on the area of molecular interactions, we perform manual and automatic analysis, and we find that the set of all citances to a target article not only covers most information (entities, functions, experimental methods, and other biological concepts) found in its abstract, but also contains 20% more concepts. We further present a detailed summary of the differences across information types, and we examine the effects other citations and time have on the content of citances
Generating indicative-informative summaries with SumUM
We present and evaluate SumUM, a text summarization system that takes a raw technical text as input and produces an indicative informative summary. The indicative part of the summary identifies the topics of the document, and the informative part elaborates on some of these topics according to the reader's interest. SumUM motivates the topics, describes entities, and defines concepts. It is a first step for exploring the issue of dynamic summarization. This is accomplished through a process of shallow syntactic and semantic analysis, concept identification, and text regeneration. Our method was developed through the study of a corpus of abstracts written by professional abstractors. Relying on human judgment, we have evaluated indicativeness, informativeness, and text acceptability of the automatic summaries. The results thus far indicate good performance when compared with other summarization technologies
Write Free or Die: Vol. 04, No. 01
Department Writing Goals, Outcomes, and Plans, Page 1-2
Upcoming Events, Page 1
Persistence v Genius, Page 2
Writing Committee Members, Page 2
Dangling Modifier, Page 3-4
Ask Matt, Page 5-6
Grammar Box, Page 7
Past Perfect, Page
- …