Verification of Generalized Inconsistency-Aware Knowledge and Action Bases (Extended Version)

Knowledge and Action Bases (KABs) have been put forward as a semantically rich representation of a domain, using a DL KB to account for its static aspects, and actions to evolve its extensional part over time, possibly introducing new objects. Recently, KABs have been extended to manage inconsistency, with ad-hoc verification techniques geared towards specific semantics. This work provides a twofold contribution along this line of research. On the one hand, we enrich KABs with a high-level, compact action language inspired by Golog, obtaining so called Golog-KABs (GKABs). On the other hand, we introduce a parametric execution semantics for GKABs, so as to elegantly accomodate a plethora of inconsistency-aware semantics based on the notion of repair. We then provide several reductions for the verification of sophisticated first-order temporal properties over inconsistency-aware GKABs, and show that it can be addressed using known techniques, developed for standard KABs

A predicative variant of a realizability tripos for the Minimalist Foundation.

open2noHere we present a predicative variant of a realizability tripos validating the intensional level of the Minimalist Foundation extended with Formal Church thesis.the file attached contains the whole number of the journal including the mentioned pubblicationopenMaietti, Maria Emilia; Maschio, SamueleMaietti, MARIA EMILIA; Maschio, Samuel

First-Order Stable Model Semantics with Intensional Functions

In classical logic, nonBoolean fluents, such as the location of an object, can be naturally described by functions. However, this is not the case in answer set programs, where the values of functions are pre-defined, and nonmonotonicity of the semantics is related to minimizing the extents of predicates but has nothing to do with functions. We extend the first-order stable model semantics by Ferraris, Lee, and Lifschitz to allow intensional functions -- functions that are specified by a logic program just like predicates are specified. We show that many known properties of the stable model semantics are naturally extended to this formalism and compare it with other related approaches to incorporating intensional functions. Furthermore, we use this extension as a basis for defining Answer Set Programming Modulo Theories (ASPMT), analogous to the way that Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) is defined, allowing for SMT-like effective first-order reasoning in the context of ASP. Using SMT solving techniques involving functions, ASPMT can be applied to domains containing real numbers and alleviates the grounding problem. We show that other approaches to integrating ASP and CSP/SMT can be related to special cases of ASPMT in which functions are limited to non-intensional ones.Comment: 69 page

Arboreal Categories: an Axiomatic Theory of Resources

Game comonads provide a categorical syntax-free approach to finite model theory, and their Eilenberg-Moore coalgebras typically encode important combinatorial parameters of structures. In this paper, we develop a framework whereby the essential properties of these categories of coalgebras are captured in a purely axiomatic fashion. To this end, we introduce arboreal categories, which have an intrinsic process structure, allowing dynamic notions such as bisimulation and back-and-forth games, and resource notions such as number of rounds of a game, to be defined. These are related to extensional or “static” structures via arboreal covers, which are resource-indexed comonadic adjunctions. These ideas are developed in a general, axiomatic setting, and applied to relational structures, where the comonadic constructions for pebbling, Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé and modal bisimulation games recently introduced by Abramsky, Dawar et al. are recovered, showing that many of the fundamental notions of finite model theory and descriptive complexity arise from instances of arboreal covers

HoCHC: A Refutationally Complete and Semantically Invariant System of Higher-order Logic Modulo Theories

We present a simple resolution proof system for higher-order constrained Horn clauses (HoCHC) - a system of higher-order logic modulo theories - and prove its soundness and refutational completeness w.r.t. the standard semantics. As corollaries, we obtain the compactness theorem and semi-decidability of HoCHC for semi-decidable background theories, and we prove that HoCHC satisfies a canonical model property. Moreover a variant of the well-known translation from higher-order to 1st-order logic is shown to be sound and complete for HoCHC in standard semantics. We illustrate how to transfer decidability results for (fragments of) 1st-order logic modulo theories to our higher-order setting, using as example the Bernays-Schonfinkel-Ramsey fragment of HoCHC modulo a restricted form of Linear Integer Arithmetic

What If? The Exploration of an Idea

A crucial question here is what, exactly, the conditional in the naive truth/set comprehension principles is. In 'Logic of Paradox', I outlined two options. One is to take it to be the material conditional of the extensional paraconsistent logic LP. Call this "Strategy 1". LP is a relatively weak logic, however. In particular, the material conditional does not detach. The other strategy is to take it to be some detachable conditional. Call this "Strategy 2". The aim of the present essay is to investigate Stragey 1. It is not to advocate it. The work is simply an extended exploration of the strategy, its strengths, its weaknesses, and the various dierent ways in which it may be implemented. In the first part of the paper I will set up the appropriate background details. In the second, I will look at the strategy as it applies to the semantic paradoxes. In the third I will look at how it applies to the set-theoretic paradoxes

Temporal Answer Set Programming

[Abstract] Commonsense temporal reasoning is full of situations that require drawing default conclusions, since we rarely have all the information available. Unfortunately, most modal temporal logics cannot accommodate default reasoning, since they typically deal with a monotonic inference relation. On the other hand, non-monotonic approaches are very expensive and their treatment of time is not so well delimited and studied as in modal logic. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) is the first non-monotonic temporal logic which fully covers the syntax of some standard modal temporal approach without requiring further constructions. TEL shares the syntax of Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) (first proposed by Arthur Prior and later extended by Hans Kamp) which has become one of the simplest, most used and best known temporal logics in Theoretical Computer Science. Although TEL had been already defined, few results were known about its fundamental properties and nothing at all on potential computational methods that could be applied for practical purposes. This situation unfavourably contrasted with the huge body of knowledge available for LTL, both in well-known formal properties and in computing methods with practical implementations. In this thesis we have mostly filled this gap, following a research program that has systematically analysed different essential properties of TEL and, simultaneously, built computational tools for its practical application. As an overall, this thesis collects a corpus of results that constitutes a significant breakthrough in the knowledge about TEL.[Resumen] El razonamiento temporal del sentido común está lleno de situaciones que requieren suponer conclusiones por defecto, puesto que raramente contamos con toda la información disponible. Lamentablemente, la mayoría de lógicas modales temporales no permiten modelar este tipo de razonamiento por defecto debido a que, típicamente, se definen por medio de relaciones de inferencia monótonas. Por el contrario, las aproximaciones no monótonas existentes son típicamente muy costosas pero su manejo del tiempo no está tan bien delimitado como en lógica modal. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) es la primera lógica temporal no monótona que cubre totalmente la sintaxis de alguna de las lógicas modales tradicionales sin requerir el uso de más construcciones. TEL comparte la sintaxis de Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) (formalismo propuesto por Arthur Prior y posteriormente extendido por Hans Kamp), que es una de las lógicas más simples, utilizadas y mejor conocidas en Teoría de la Computación. Aunque TEL había sido definido, muy pocas propiedades eran conocidas, lo que contrastaba con el vasto conocimiento de LTL que está presente en el estado del arte. En esta tesis hemos estudiado diferentes aspectos de TEL, una novedosa combinación de lógica modal temporal y un formalismo no monótono. A grandes rasgos, esta tesis recoge un conjunto de resultados, tanto desde el punto de vista teórico como práctico, que constituye un gran avance en lo relativo al conocimiento sobre TEL.[Resumo] O razoamento do sentido común aplicado ao caso temporal está cheo de situacións que requiren supoñer conclusións por defecto, posto que raramente contamos con toda a información dispoñible. Lamentablemente a maioría de lóxicas modais temporáis non permiten modelar este tipo de razoamento por defecto debido a que, típicamente, están definidas por medio de relacións de inferencia monótonas. Pola contra, as aproximacións non monótonas existentes son moi costosos e o seu tratamento do tempo non está ben tan delimitado nin estudiado como nas lóxicas modais. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) é a primeira aproximación non monótona que cubre totalmente a sintaxe dalgunha das lóxicas modais traidicionáis sen requerir o uso de máis construccións. TEL comparte a sintaxe de Lineartime Temporal Logic (LTL) (formalismo proposto por Arthur Prior e extendido posteriormente por Hans Kamp), que é considerada unha das lóxicas modais máis simples, utilizadas e coñecidas dentro da Teoría da Computación. Aínda que TEL xa fora definido previamente, moi poucas das súas propiedades eran coñecidas, dato que contrasta co vasto coñecemento de LTL existente no estado da arte. Nesta tese, estudiamos diferentes aspectos de TEL, unha novidosa combinación de lóxica modal temporal e un formalimo non monótono. A grandes rasgos, esta tese recolle un conxunto de resultados, tanto dende o punto de vista teórico como práctico, que constitúe un gran avance no relativo ó coñecemento sobre o formalismo TEL

The modal logic of set-theoretic potentialism and the potentialist maximality principles

We analyze the precise modal commitments of several natural varieties of set-theoretic potentialism, using tools we develop for a general model-theoretic account of potentialism, building on those of Hamkins, Leibman and L\"owe, including the use of buttons, switches, dials and ratchets. Among the potentialist conceptions we consider are: rank potentialism (true in all larger $V_\beta$); Grothendieck-Zermelo potentialism (true in all larger $V_\kappa$ for inaccessible cardinals $\kappa$); transitive-set potentialism (true in all larger transitive sets); forcing potentialism (true in all forcing extensions); countable-transitive-model potentialism (true in all larger countable transitive models of ZFC); countable-model potentialism (true in all larger countable models of ZFC); and others. In each case, we identify lower bounds for the modal validities, which are generally either S4.2 or S4.3, and an upper bound of S5, proving in each case that these bounds are optimal. The validity of S5 in a world is a potentialist maximality principle, an interesting set-theoretic principle of its own. The results can be viewed as providing an analysis of the modal commitments of the various set-theoretic multiverse conceptions corresponding to each potentialist account.Comment: 36 pages. Commentary can be made about this article at http://jdh.hamkins.org/set-theoretic-potentialism. Minor revisions in v2; further minor revisions in v