301 research outputs found

    Sorting improves word-aligned bitmap indexes

    Get PDF
    Bitmap indexes must be compressed to reduce input/output costs and minimize CPU usage. To accelerate logical operations (AND, OR, XOR) over bitmaps, we use techniques based on run-length encoding (RLE), such as Word-Aligned Hybrid (WAH) compression. These techniques are sensitive to the order of the rows: a simple lexicographical sort can divide the index size by 9 and make indexes several times faster. We investigate row-reordering heuristics. Simply permuting the columns of the table can increase the sorting efficiency by 40%. Secondary contributions include efficient algorithms to construct and aggregate bitmaps. The effect of word length is also reviewed by constructing 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit indexes. Using 64-bit CPUs, we find that 64-bit indexes are slightly faster than 32-bit indexes despite being nearly twice as large

    Histogram-Aware Sorting for Enhanced Word-Aligned Compression in Bitmap Indexes

    Get PDF
    Bitmap indexes must be compressed to reduce input/output costs and minimize CPU usage. To accelerate logical operations (AND, OR, XOR) over bitmaps, we use techniques based on run-length encoding (RLE), such as Word-Aligned Hybrid (WAH) compression. These techniques are sensitive to the order of the rows: a simple lexicographical sort can divide the index size by 9 and make indexes several times faster. We investigate reordering heuristics based on computed attribute-value histograms. Simply permuting the columns of the table based on these histograms can increase the sorting efficiency by 40%.Comment: To appear in proceedings of DOLAP 200

    Tri de la table de faits et compression des index bitmaps avec alignement sur les mots

    Get PDF
    Bitmap indexes are frequently used to index multidimensional data. They rely mostly on sequential input/output. Bitmaps can be compressed to reduce input/output costs and minimize CPU usage. The most efficient compression techniques are based on run-length encoding (RLE), such as Word-Aligned Hybrid (WAH) compression. This type of compression accelerates logical operations (AND, OR) over the bitmaps. However, run-length encoding is sensitive to the order of the facts. Thus, we propose to sort the fact tables. We review lexicographic, Gray-code, and block-wise sorting. We found that a lexicographic sort improves compression--sometimes generating indexes twice as small--and make indexes several times faster. While sorting takes time, this is partially offset by the fact that it is faster to index a sorted table. Column order is significant: it is generally preferable to put the columns having more distinct values at the beginning. A block-wise sort is much less efficient than a full sort. Moreover, we found that Gray-code sorting is not better than lexicographic sorting when using word-aligned compression.Comment: to appear at BDA'0

    Better bitmap performance with Roaring bitmaps

    Get PDF
    Bitmap indexes are commonly used in databases and search engines. By exploiting bit-level parallelism, they can significantly accelerate queries. However, they can use much memory, and thus we might prefer compressed bitmap indexes. Following Oracle's lead, bitmaps are often compressed using run-length encoding (RLE). Building on prior work, we introduce the Roaring compressed bitmap format: it uses packed arrays for compression instead of RLE. We compare it to two high-performance RLE-based bitmap encoding techniques: WAH (Word Aligned Hybrid compression scheme) and Concise (Compressed `n' Composable Integer Set). On synthetic and real data, we find that Roaring bitmaps (1) often compress significantly better (e.g., 2 times) and (2) are faster than the compressed alternatives (up to 900 times faster for intersections). Our results challenge the view that RLE-based bitmap compression is best

    Reordering Rows for Better Compression: Beyond the Lexicographic Order

    Get PDF
    Sorting database tables before compressing them improves the compression rate. Can we do better than the lexicographical order? For minimizing the number of runs in a run-length encoding compression scheme, the best approaches to row-ordering are derived from traveling salesman heuristics, although there is a significant trade-off between running time and compression. A new heuristic, Multiple Lists, which is a variant on Nearest Neighbor that trades off compression for a major running-time speedup, is a good option for very large tables. However, for some compression schemes, it is more important to generate long runs rather than few runs. For this case, another novel heuristic, Vortex, is promising. We find that we can improve run-length encoding up to a factor of 3 whereas we can improve prefix coding by up to 80%: these gains are on top of the gains due to lexicographically sorting the table. We prove that the new row reordering is optimal (within 10%) at minimizing the runs of identical values within columns, in a few cases.Comment: to appear in ACM TOD

    ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹๋“ค์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํšจ์œจ์  ํ‘œํ˜„๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. Srinivasa Rao Satti.Numerous big data are generated from a plethora of sources. Most of the data stored as files contain a non-fixed type of schema, so that the files are suitable to be maintained as semi-structured document formats. A number of those formats, such as XML (eXtensible Markup Language), JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), and YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language) are suggested to sustain hierarchy in the original corpora of data. Several data models structuring the gathered data - including RDF (Resource Description Framework) - depend on the semi-structured document formats to be serialized and transferred for future processing. Since the semi-structured document formats focus on readability and verbosity, redundant space is required to organize and maintain the document. Even though general-purpose compression schemes are widely used to compact the documents, applying those algorithms hinder future handling of the corpora, owing to loss of internal structures. The area of succinct data structures is widely investigated and researched in theory, to provide answers to the queries while the encoded data occupy space close to the information-theoretic lower bound. Bit vectors and trees are the notable succinct data structures. Nevertheless, there were few attempts to apply the idea of succinct data structures to represent the semi-structured documents in space-efficient manner. In this dissertation we propose a unified, space-efficient representation of various semi-structured document formats. The core functionality of this representation is its compactness and query-ability derived from enriched functions of succinct data structures. Incorporation of (a) bit indexed arrays, (b) succinct ordinal trees, and (c) compression techniques engineers the compact representation. We implement this representation in practice, and show by experiments that construction of this representation decreases the disk usage by up to 60% while occupying 90% less RAM. We also allow processing a document in partial manner, to allow processing of larger corpus of big data even in the constrained environment. In parallel to establishing the aforementioned compact semi-structured document representation, we provide and reinforce some of the existing compression schemes in this dissertation. We first suggest an idea to encode an array of integers that is not necessarily sorted. This compaction scheme improves upon the existing universal code systems, by assistance of succinct bit vector structure. We show that our suggested algorithm reduces space usage by up to 44% while consuming 15% less time than the original code system, while the algorithm additionally supports random access of elements upon the encoded array. We also reinforce the SBH bitmap index compression algorithm. The main strength of this scheme is the use of intermediate super-bucket during operations, giving better performance on querying through a combination of compressed bitmap indexes. Inspired from splits done during the intermediate process of the SBH algorithm, we give an improved compression mechanism supporting parallelism that could be utilized in both CPUs and GPUs. We show by experiments that this CPU parallel processing optimization diminishes compression and decompression times by up to 38% in a 4-core machine without modifying the bitmap compressed form. For GPUs, the new algorithm gives 48% faster query processing time in the experiments, compared to the previous existing bitmap index compression schemes.์…€ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๋น… ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์›๋ณธ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๊ณ ์ •๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์Šคํ‚ค๋งˆ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ €์žฅ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค. XML, JSON ๋ฐ YAML๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋‚ด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” RDF์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์€ ์‚ฌํ›„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ €์žฅ ๋ฐ ์ „์†ก์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹์— ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹์€ ๊ฐ€๋…์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ณ€์„ฑ์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋ฌธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์„œ๋ฅผ ์••์ถ•์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ด๋“ค ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฌธ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์†์‹ค๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์‚ฌํ›„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ •๋ณด์ด๋ก ์  ํ•˜ํ•œ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋งŒ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ €์žฅ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์งˆ์˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ถ„์•ผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋น„ํŠธ์—ด๊ณผ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋“ค์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋“ค์„ ์ €์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ˜•์‹์„ ํ†ต์ผ๋˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํšจ์œจ์  ํ‘œํ˜„๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์งˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด๋‹ค. ๋น„ํŠธ์—ด๋กœ ์ธ๋ฑ์‹ฑ๋œ ๋ฐฐ์—ด, ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ˆœ์„œ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๋‹น ํ‘œํ˜„๋ฒ•์„ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹ค์žฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋“ค์€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 60% ์ ์€ ๋””์Šคํฌ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณผ 90% ์ ์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ‘œํ˜„๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋“ค์€ ๋ถ„ํ• ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋„ ๋น… ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋“ค์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํšจ์œจ์  ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ‘œํ˜„๋ฒ•์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•จ๊ณผ ๋™์‹œ์—, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ด๋ฏธ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ •๋ ฌ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์„ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์•„์ด๋””์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ, ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•œ ๋น„ํŠธ์—ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ 44\% ์ ์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ 15\% ์ ์€ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธํ™” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ถ€ํ˜ธํ™”๋œ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์—์„œ์˜ ์ž„์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„ํŠธ๋งต ์ธ๋ฑ์Šค ์••์ถ•์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” SBH ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ฃผ๋œ ๊ฐ•์ ์€ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธํ™”์™€ ๋ณตํ˜ธํ™” ์ง„ํ–‰ ์‹œ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๋งค๊ฐœ์ธ ์Šˆํผ๋ฒ„์ผ“์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์••์ถ•๋œ ๋น„ํŠธ๋งต ์ธ๋ฑ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์งˆ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์œ„ ์••์ถ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„ํ• ์—์„œ ์˜๊ฐ์„ ์–ป์–ด, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ CPU ๋ฐ GPU์— ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™” ์••์ถ• ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด CPU ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์••์ถ•๋œ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ์—†์ด 4์ฝ”์–ด ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 38\%์˜ ์••์ถ• ๋ฐ ํ•ด์ œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. GPU ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” GPU ๋น„ํŠธ๋งต ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด 48\% ๋น ๋ฅธ ์งˆ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Contribution 3 1.2 Organization 5 Chapter 2 Background 6 2.1 Model of Computation 6 2.2 Succinct Data Structures 7 Chapter 3 Space-efficient Representation of Integer Arrays 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Preliminaries 10 3.2.1 Universal Code System 10 3.2.2 Bit Vector 13 3.3 Algorithm Description 13 3.3.1 Main Principle 14 3.3.2 Optimization in the Implementation 16 3.4 Experimental Results 16 Chapter 4 Space-efficient Parallel Compressed Bitmap Index Processing 19 4.1 Introduction 19 4.2 Related Work 23 4.2.1 Byte-aligned Bitmap Code (BBC) 24 4.2.2 Word-Aligned Hybrid (WAH) 27 4.2.3 WAH-derived Algorithms 28 4.2.4 GPU-based WAH Algorithms 31 4.2.5 Super Byte-aligned Hybrid (SBH) 33 4.3 Parallelizing SBH 38 4.3.1 CPU Parallelism 38 4.3.2 GPU Parallelism 39 4.4 Experimental Results 40 4.4.1 Plain Version 41 4.4.2 Parallelized Version 46 4.4.3 Summary 49 Chapter 5 Space-efficient Representation of Semi-structured Document Formats 50 5.1 Preliminaries 50 5.1.1 Semi-structured Document Formats 50 5.1.2 Resource Description Framework 57 5.1.3 Succinct Ordinal Tree Representations 60 5.1.4 String Compression Schemes 64 5.2 Representation 66 5.2.1 Bit String Indexed Array 67 5.2.2 Main Structure 68 5.2.3 Single Document as a Collection of Chunks 72 5.2.4 Supporting Queries 73 5.3 Experimental Results 75 5.3.1 Datasets 76 5.3.2 Construction Time 78 5.3.3 RAM Usage during Construction 80 5.3.4 Disk Usage and Serialization Time 83 5.3.5 Chunk Division 83 5.3.6 String Compression 88 5.3.7 Query Time 89 Chapter 6 Conclusion 94 Bibliography 96 ์š”์•ฝ 109 Acknowledgements 111Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore