11,022 research outputs found

    Supporting Special-Purpose Health Care Models via Web Interfaces

    Get PDF
    The potential of the Web, via both the Internet and intranets, to facilitate development of clinical information systems has been evident for some time. Most Web-based clinical workstations interfaces, however, provide merely a loose collection of access channels. There are numerous examples of systems for access to either patient data or clinical guidelines, but only isolated cases where clinical decision support is presented integrally with the process of patient care, in particular, in the form of active alerts and reminders based on patient data. Moreover, pressures in the health industry are increasing the need for doctors to practice in accordance with ¿best practice¿ guidelines and often to operate under novel health-care arrangements. We present the Care Plan On-Line (CPOL) system, which provides intranet-based support for the SA HealthPlus Coordinated Care model for chronic disease management. We describe the interface design rationale of CPOL and its implementation framework, which is flexible and broadly applicable to support new health care models over intranets or the Internet

    Clinical utility of advanced microbiology testing tools

    Get PDF

    Agent-based modeling: a systematic assessment of use cases and requirements for enhancing pharmaceutical research and development productivity.

    Get PDF
    A crisis continues to brew within the pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) enterprise: productivity continues declining as costs rise, despite ongoing, often dramatic scientific and technical advances. To reverse this trend, we offer various suggestions for both the expansion and broader adoption of modeling and simulation (M&S) methods. We suggest strategies and scenarios intended to enable new M&S use cases that directly engage R&D knowledge generation and build actionable mechanistic insight, thereby opening the door to enhanced productivity. What M&S requirements must be satisfied to access and open the door, and begin reversing the productivity decline? Can current methods and tools fulfill the requirements, or are new methods necessary? We draw on the relevant, recent literature to provide and explore answers. In so doing, we identify essential, key roles for agent-based and other methods. We assemble a list of requirements necessary for M&S to meet the diverse needs distilled from a collection of research, review, and opinion articles. We argue that to realize its full potential, M&S should be actualized within a larger information technology framework--a dynamic knowledge repository--wherein models of various types execute, evolve, and increase in accuracy over time. We offer some details of the issues that must be addressed for such a repository to accrue the capabilities needed to reverse the productivity decline

    FARMAPRICE: A Pharmacogenetic Clinical decision support system for precise and Cost-Effective Therapy

    Get PDF
    Pharmacogenetic (PGx) guidelines for the precise dosing and selection of drugs remain poorly implemented in current clinical practice. Among the barriers to the implementation process is the lack of clinical decision support system (CDSS) tools to aid health providers in managing PGx information in the clinical context. The present study aimed to describe the first Italian endeavor to develop a PGx CDSS, called FARMAPRICE. FARMAPRICE prototype was conceived for integration of patient molecular data into the clinical prescription process in the Italian Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-Aviano Hospital. It was developed through a coordinated partnership between two high-tech companies active in the computerization of the Italian healthcare system. Introducing FARMAPRICE into the clinical setting can aid physicians in prescribing the most efficacious and cost-effective pharmacological therapy available

    An integrated general practice and pharmacy-based intervention to promote the use of appropriate preventive medications among individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are responsible for significant morbidity, premature mortality, and economic burden. Despite established evidence that supports the use of preventive medications among patients at high CVD risk, treatment gaps remain. Building on prior evidence and a theoretical framework, a complex intervention has been designed to address these gaps among high-risk, under-treated patients in the Australian primary care setting. This intervention comprises a general practice quality improvement tool incorporating clinical decision support and audit/feedback capabilities; availability of a range of CVD polypills (fixed-dose combinations of two blood pressure lowering agents, a statin ± aspirin) for prescription when appropriate; and access to a pharmacy-based program to support long-term medication adherence and lifestyle modification. Methods: Following a systematic development process, the intervention will be evaluated in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial including 70 general practices for a median period of 18 months. The 35 general practices in the intervention group will work with a nominated partner pharmacy, whereas those in the control group will provide usual care without access to the intervention tools. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at high CVD risk who were inadequately treated at baseline who achieve target blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at the study end. The outcomes will be analyzed using data from electronic medical records, utilizing a validated extraction tool. Detailed process and economic evaluations will also be performed. Discussion: The study intends to establish evidence about an intervention that combines technological innovation with team collaboration between patients, pharmacists, and general practitioners (GPs) for CVD prevention. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN1261600023342

    Knowledge engineering complex decision support system in managing rheumatoid arthritis.

    Get PDF
    Background: The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves partially recursive attempts to make optimal treatment decisions that balance the risks of the treatment to the patient against the benefits of the treatment, while monitoring the patient closely for clinical response, as inferred from prior and residual disease activity, and unwanted drug effects, including abnormal laboratory findings. To the extent that this process is logical, based on best available evidence and determined by considered opinion, it should be amenable to capture within a Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs). The formalisation of logical transformations and their execution by computer tools at point of patient encounter holds the promise of more efficient and consistent use of treatment rules and more reliable clinical decision making. Research Setting: The early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA) clinic of the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) with approximately 20 RA patient visits per week, and involving 160 patients with a median duration of treatment of more than 4.5 years. Methods: The study applied a Knowledge Engineering approach to interpret the complexities of RA management, in order to implement a knowledge-based CDSS. The study utilised Knowledge Acquisition processes to elicit and explicitly define the RA management rules underpinning the development of the CDSS; the processes were (1) conducting a comprehensive literature review of RA management, (2) observing clinic consultations and (3) consulting with local clinical experts/leaders. Bayes’ Theorem and Bayes Net were used to generate models for assessing contingent probabilities of unwanted events. A questionnaire based on 16 real patient cases was developed to test the concordance agreement between CDSS generated guidance in response to real-life clinical scenarios and decisions of rheumatologists in response to the scenarios. Results: (1) Complex RA management rules were established which included (a) Rules for Changes in Dose/Agent and (b) Drug Toxicity Monitoring Rules. (2) A computer interpretable dynamic model for implementing the complex clinical guidance was found to be applicable. (3) A framework for a methotrexate (MTX) toxicity prediction model was developed, thereby allowing missing risk ratios (probabilities) to be identified. (4) Clinical decision-making processes and workflows were described. Finally, (5) a preliminary version of the CDSS which computed Rules for Changes in Dose/Agent and Drug Toxicity Monitoring Rules was implemented and tested. One hundred and twenty-eight decisions collected from the 8 participating rheumatologists established the ability of the CDSS to match decisions of clinicians accustomed to application of Rules for Changes in Dose/Agent; rheumatologists unfamiliar with the rules displayed lower concordance (0.7857 vs. 0.3929, P = 0.0027). Neither group of rheumatologists matched the performance of the CDSS in making decisions based on highly complex Drug Toxicity Monitoring Rules (0.3611 vs. 0.4167, P = 0.7215). Conclusion: The study has made important contributions to the development of a CDSS suitable for routine use in the eRA clinic setting. Knowledge Acquisition processes were used to elicit domain knowledge, and to refine, validate and articulate eRA management rules, that came to form the knowledge base of the CDSS. The development of computer interpretable guideline models underpinned the CDSS development. The alignment of CDSS guidance in response to clinical scenarios with questionnaire responses of rheumatologists familiar with and accepting of the management rules (and divergence with responses by rheumatologists not familiar with the rules) indicates that the CDSS can be used to guide toward evidence-based considered opinion. The poor correlation between CDSS generated guidance regarding out of range blood results and response of rheumatologists to questions regarding toxicity scenarios, underlines the value of computer aided guidance when decisions involve greater complexity. It also suggests the need for attention to rule development and considered opinion in this area. Discussion: Effective utilisation of extant knowledge is fundamental to knowledgebased systems in healthcare. CDSSs development for chronic disease management is a complex undertaking which is tractable using Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Acquisition approaches coupled with modelling into computer interpretable algorithms. Complexities of drug toxicity monitoring were addressed using Bayes’ Theorem and Bayes Net for making probability based decisions under conditions of uncertainty. While for logistic reasons the system could not be developed to full implementation, preliminary analyses support the utility of the approach, both for intensifying treatment on a response contingent basis and also for complex drug toxicity monitoring. CDSSs are inherently suited to iterative refinements based on new knowledge including that arising from analyses of the data they capture during their use. This study has achieved important steps toward implementation and refinement.Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, 201
    corecore