Confluence Detection for Transformations of Labelled Transition Systems

The development of complex component software systems can be made more manageable by first creating an abstract model and then incrementally adding details. Model transformation is an approach to add such details in a controlled way. In order for model transformation systems to be useful, it is crucial that they are confluent, i.e. that when applied on a given model, they will always produce a unique output model, independent of the order in which rules of the system are applied on the input. In this work, we consider Labelled Transition Systems (LTSs) to reason about the semantics of models, and LTS transformation systems to reason about model transformations. In related work, the problem of confluence detection has been investigated for general graph structures. We observe, however, that confluence can be detected more efficiently in special cases where the graphs have particular structural properties. In this paper, we present a number of observations to detect confluence of LTS transformation systems, and propose both a new confluence detection algorithm and a conflict resolution algorithm based on them.Comment: In Proceedings GaM 2015, arXiv:1504.0244

Checking property preservation of refining transformations for model-driven development

In Model-Driven Software Development, a software product is created through iteratively refined modelling. It is crucial that this process preserves certain desirable properties of the initial model. However, checking this is increasingly difficult as the models are increasingly more refined. We propose an incremental model checking technique to determine the preservation of safety and liveness properties in models of concurrent systems with respect to changes applied on individual processes, formalised as transformations of Labelled Transition Systems. The preservation check involves checking bisimilarity between transformed and new behaviour, and never involves reexploring unchanged behaviour. We prove its correctness and demonstrate its applicability

A model driven approach to analysis and synthesis of sequence diagrams

Software design is a vital phase in a software development life cycle as it creates a blueprint for the implementation of the software. It is crucial that software designs are error-free since any unresolved design-errors could lead to costly implementation errors. To minimize these errors, the software community adopted the concept of modelling from various other engineering disciplines. Modelling provides a platform to create and share abstract or conceptual representations of the software system – leading to various modelling languages, among them Unified Modelling Language (UML) and Petri Nets. While Petri Nets strong mathematical capability allows various formal analyses to be performed on the models, UMLs user-friendly nature presented a more appealing platform for system designers. Using Multi Paradigm Modelling, this thesis presents an approach where system designers may have the best of both worlds; SD2PN, a model transformation that maps UML Sequence Diagrams into Petri Nets allows system designers to perform modelling in UML while still using Petri Nets to perform the analysis. Multi Paradigm Modelling also provided a platform for a well-established theory in Petri Nets – synthesis to be adopted into Sequence Diagram as a method of putting-together different Sequence Diagrams based on a set of techniques and algorithms

Showing Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation - A Comparison of Techniques

Model transformation is a prime technique in modern, model-driven software design. One of the most challenging issues is to show that the semantics of the models is not affected by the transformation. So far, there is hardly any research into this issue, in particular in those cases where the source and target languages are different.\ud \ud In this paper, we are using two different state-of-the-art proof techniques (explicit bisimulation construction versus borrowed contexts) to show bisimilarity preservation of a given model transformation between two simple (self-defined) languages, both of which are equipped with a graph transformation-based operational semantics. The contrast between these proof techniques is interesting because they are based on different model transformation strategies: triple graph grammars versus in situ transformation. We proceed to compare the proofs and discuss scalability to a more realistic setting.\u

Model consistency management for systems engineering

Um der Komplexität der interdisziplinären Entwicklung moderner technischer Systeme Herr zu werden, findet die Entwicklung heutzutage meist modellbasiert statt. Dabei werden zahlreiche verschiedene Modelle genutzt, die jeweils unterschiedliche Gesichtspunkte berücksichtigen und sich auf verschiedenen Abstraktionsebenen befinden. Wenn die hierbei auftretenden Inkonsistenzen zwischen den Modellen ungelöst bleiben, kann dies zu Fehlern im fertigen System führen. Modelltransformations- und -synchronisationstechniken sind ein vielversprechender Ansatz, um solche Inkonsistenzen zu erkennen und aufzulösen. Existierende Modellsynchronisationstechniken sind allerdings nicht mächtig genug, um die komplexen Beziehungen in so einem Entwicklungsszenario zu unterstützen. In dieser Arbeit wird eine neue Modellsynchronisationstechnik präsentiert, die es erlaubt, Modelle verschiedener Sichten und Abstraktionsebenen zu synchronisieren. Dabei werden Metriken zur Erhöhung des Automatisierungsgrads eingesetzt, die Expertenwissen abbilden. Der Ansatz erlaubt unterschiedliche Grade an Benutzerinteraktion, von vollautomatischer Funktionsweise bis zu feingranularen manuellen Entscheidungen.The development of complex mechatronic systems requires the close collaboration of different disciplines, like mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, control engineering, and software engineering. To tackle the complexity of such systems, such a development is heavily based on models. Engineers use several models on different abstraction levels, for different purposes and with different view-points. Usually, a discipline-spanning system model is developed during the first, interdisciplinary system design phase. For the implementation phase, the disciplines use different models and tools to develop the discipline-specific aspects of the system. During such a model-based development, inconsistencies between the different discipline-specific models and the discipline-spanning system model are likely to occur, because changes to discipline-specific models may affect the discipline-spanning system model and models of other disciplines. These inconsistencies lead to increased development time and costs if they remain unresolved. Model transformation and synchronization are promising techniques to detect and resolve such inconsistencies. However, existing model synchronization solutions are not powerful enough to support the complex consistency relations of such an application scenario. In this thesis, we present a novel model synchronization technique that allows for synchronized models with multiple views and abstraction levels. To minimize the information loss and improve automation during the synchronization, it employs metrics to encode expert knowledge. The approach can be customized to allow different amounts of user interaction, from full automation to fine-grained manual decisions.Tag der Verteidigung: 24.10.2014Paderborn, Univ., Diss., 201