Separating Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments From All Falsifiable Assumptions

In this paper, we study succinct computationally sound proofs (arguments) for NP, whose communication complexity is polylogarithmic the instance and witness sizes. The seminal works of Kilian \u2792 and Micali \u2794 show that such arguments can be constructed under standard cryptographic hardness assumptions with four rounds of interaction, and that they be made non-interactive in the random-oracle model. The latter construction also gives us some evidence that succinct non interactive arguments (SNARGs) may exist in the standard model with a common reference string (CRS), by replacing the oracle with a sufficiently complicated hash function whose description goes in the CRS. However, we currently do not know of any construction of SNARGs with a formal proof of security under any simple cryptographic assumption. In this work, we give a broad black-box separation result, showing that black-box reductions cannot be used to prove the security of any SNARG construction based on any falsifiable cryptographic assumption. This includes essentially all common assumptions used in cryptography (one-way functions, trapdoor permutations, DDH, RSA, LWE etc.). More generally, we say that an assumption is falsifiable if it can be modeled as an interactive game between an adversary and an efficient challenger that can efficiently decide if the adversary won the game. This is similar, in spirit, to the notion of falsifiability of Naor \u2703, and captures the fact that we can efficiently check if an adversarial strategy breaks the assumption. Our separation result also extends to designated verifier SNARGs, where the verifier needs a trapdoor associated with the CRS to verify arguments, and slightly succinct SNARGs, whose size is only required to be sublinear in the statement and witness size

Functional signatures

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 41-42).In this thesis, we introduce the notion of functional signatures. In a functional signature scheme, in addition to a master signing key that can be used to sign any message, there are signing keys for a function f, which allow one to sign any message in the range of f. An immediate application of functional signature scheme is the delegation by a master authority to a third party of the ability to sign a restricted set of messages. We also show applications of functional signature in constructing succinct non-interactive arguments and delegation schemes. We give several constructions for this primitive, and describe the trade-offs between them in terms of the assumptions they require and the size of the signatures.by Ioana Ivan.S.M

On the Cryptographic Hardness of Local Search

We show new hardness results for the class of Polynomial Local Search problems (PLS): - Hardness of PLS based on a falsifiable assumption on bilinear groups introduced by Kalai, Paneth, and Yang (STOC 2019), and the Exponential Time Hypothesis for randomized algorithms. Previous standard model constructions relied on non-falsifiable and non-standard assumptions. - Hardness of PLS relative to random oracles. The construction is essentially different than previous constructions, and in particular is unconditionally secure. The construction also demonstrates the hardness of parallelizing local search. The core observation behind the results is that the unique proofs property of incrementally-verifiable computations previously used to demonstrate hardness in PLS can be traded with a simple incremental completeness property

On a New, Efficient Framework for Falsifiable Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Arguments

Et kunnskapsløst bevis er en protokoll mellom en bevisfører og en attestant. Bevisføreren har som mål å overbevise attestanten om at visse utsagn er korrekte, som besittelse av kortnummeret til et gyldig kredittkort, uten å avsløre noen private opplysninger, som for eksempel kortnummeret selv. I mange anvendelser er det ønskelig å bruke IIK-bevis (Ikke-interaktive kunnskapsløse bevis), der bevisføreren produserer kun en enkelt melding som kan bekreftes av mange attestanter. En ulempe er at sikre IIK-bevis for ikke-trivielle språk kun kan eksistere ved tilstedeværelsen av en pålitelig tredjepart som beregner en felles referansestreng som blir gjort tilgjengelig for både bevisføreren og attestanten. Når ingen slik part eksisterer liter man av og til på ikke-interaktiv vitne-uskillbarhet, en svakere form for personvern. Studiet av effektive og sikre IIK-bevis er en kritisk del av kryptografi som har blomstret opp i det siste grunnet anvendelser i blokkjeder. I den første artikkelen konstruerer vi et nytt IIK-bevis for språkene som består av alle felles nullpunkter for en endelig mengde polynomer over en endelig kropp. Vi demonstrerer nytteverdien av beviset ved flerfoldige eksempler på anvendelser. Særlig verdt å merke seg er at det er mulig å gå nesten automatisk fra en beskrivelse av et språk på et høyt nivå til definisjonen av IIK-beviset, som minsker behovet for dedikert kryptografisk ekspertise. I den andre artikkelen konstruerer vi et IIV-bevis ved å bruke en ny kompilator. Vi utforsker begrepet Kunnskapslydighet (et sterkere sikkerhetsbegrep enn lydighet) for noen konstruksjoner av IIK-bevis. I den tredje artikkelen utvider vi arbeidet fra den første artikkelen ved å konstruere et nytt IIK-bevis for mengde-medlemskap som lar oss bevise at et element ligger, eller ikke ligger, i den gitte mengden. Flere nye konstruksjoner har bedre effektivitet sammenlignet med allerede kjente konstruksjoner.A zero-knowledge proof is a protocol between a prover, and a verifier. The prover aims to convince the verifier of the truth of some statement, such as possessing credentials for a valid credit card, without revealing any private information, such as the credentials themselves. In many applications, it is desirable to use NIZKs (Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge) proofs, where the prover sends outputs only a single message that can be verified by many verifiers. As a drawback, secure NIZKs for non-trivial languages can only exist in the presence of a trusted third party that computes a common reference string and makes it available to both the prover and verifier. When no such party exists, one sometimes relies on non interactive witness indistinguishability (NIWI), a weaker notion of privacy. The study of efficient and secure NIZKs is a crucial part of cryptography that has been thriving recently due to blockchain applications. In the first paper, we construct a new NIZK for the language of common zeros of a finite set of polynomials over a finite field. We demonstrate its usefulness by giving a large number of example applications. Notably, it is possible to go from a high-level language description to the definition of the NIZK almost automatically, lessening the need for dedicated cryptographic expertise. In the second paper, we construct a NIWI using a new compiler. We explore the notion of Knowledge Soundness (a security notion stronger than soundness) of some NIZK constructions. In the third paper, we extended the first paper’s work by constructing a new set (non-)membership NIZK that allows us to prove that an element belongs or does not belong to the given set. Many new constructions have better efficiency compared to already-known constructions.Doktorgradsavhandlin

Impossibilities in Succinct Arguments: Black-box Extraction and More

The celebrated result by Gentry and Wichs established a theoretical barrier for succinct non-interactive arguments (SNARGs), showing that for (expressive enough) hard-on-average languages, we must assume non-falsifiable assumptions. We further investigate those barriers by showing new negative and positive results related to the proof size. 1. We start by formalizing a folklore lower bound for the proof size of black-box extractable arguments based on the hardness of the language. This separates knowledge-sound SNARGs (SNARKs) in the random oracle model (that can have black-box extraction) and those in the standard model. 2. We find a positive result in the non-adaptive setting. Under the existence of non-adaptively sound SNARGs (without extractability) and from standard assumptions, it is possible to build SNARKs with black-box extractability for a non-trivial subset of NP. 3. On the other hand, we show that (under some mild assumptions) all NP languages cannot have SNARKs with black-box extractability even in the non-adaptive setting. 4. The Gentry-Wichs result does not account for the preprocessing model, under which fall several efficient constructions. We show that also, in the preprocessing model, it is impossible to construct SNARGs that rely on falsifiable assumptions in a black-box way. Along the way, we identify a class of non-trivial languages, which we dub “trapdoor languages”, that bypass some of these impossibility results

Assumptions, Efficiency and Trust in Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Vi lever i en digital verden. En betydelig del av livene våre skjer på nettet, og vi bruker internett for stadig flere formål og er avhengig av stadig mer avansert teknologi. Det er derfor viktig å beskytte seg mot ondsinnede aktører som kan forsøke å utnytte denne avhengigheten for egen vinning. Kryptografi er en sentral del av svaret på hvordan man kan beskytte internettbrukere. Historisk sett har kryptografi hovedsakelig vært opptatt av konfidensiell kommunikasjon, altså at ingen kan lese private meldinger sendt mellom to personer. I de siste tiårene har kryptografi blitt mer opptatt av å lage protokoller som garanterer personvern selv om man kan gjennomføre komplekse handlinger. Et viktig kryptografisk verktøy for å sikre at disse protokollene faktisk følges er kunnskapsløse bevis. Et kunnskapsløst bevis er en prosess hvor to parter, en bevisfører og en attestant, utveksler meldinger for å overbevise attestanten om at bevisføreren fulgte protokollen riktig (hvis dette faktisk er tilfelle) uten å avsløre privat informasjon til attestanten. For de fleste anvendelser er det ønskelig å lage et ikke-interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis (IIK-bevis), der bevisføreren kun sender én melding til attestanten. IIK-bevis har en rekke ulike bruksområder, som gjør de til attraktive studieobjekter. Et IIK-bevis har en rekke ulike egenskaper og forbedring av noen av disse fremmer vår kollektive kryptografiske kunnskap. I den første artikkelen i denne avhandlingen konstruerer vi et nytt ikke-interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis for språk basert på algebraiske mengder. Denne artikkelen er basert på arbeid av Couteau og Hartmann (Crypto 2020), som viste hvordan man omformer et bestemt interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis til et IIK-bevis. Vi følger deres tilnærming, men vi bruker et annet interaktivt kunnskapsløst bevis. Dette fører til en forbedring sammenlignet med arbeidet deres på flere områder, spesielt når det gjelder både formodninger og effektivitet. I den andre artikkelen i denne avhandlingen studerer vi egenskapene til ikke-interaktive kunnskapsløse bevis som er motstandsdyktige mot undergraving. Det er umulig å lage et IIK-bevis uten å stole på en felles referansestreng (FRS) generert av en pålitelig tredjepart. Men det finnes eksempler på IIK-bevis der ingen lærer noe privat informasjon fra beviset selv om den felles referansestrengen ble skapt på en uredelig måte. I denne artikkelen lager vi en ny kryptografisk primitiv (verifiserbart-uttrekkbare enveisfunksjoner) og viser hvordan denne primitiven er relatert til IIK-bevis med den ovennevnte egenskapen.We live in a digital world. A significant part of our lives happens online, and we use the internet for incredibly many different purposes and we rely on increasingly advanced technology. It therefore is important to protect against malicious actors who may try to exploit this reliance for their own gain. Cryptography is a key part of the answer to protecting internet users. Historically, cryptography has mainly been focused on maintaining the confidentiality of communication, ensuring that no one can read private messages sent between people. In recent decades, cryptography has become concerned with creating protocols which guarantee privacy even as they support more complex actions. A crucial cryptographic tool to ensure that these protocols are indeed followed is the zero-knowledge proof. A zero-knowledge proof is a process where two parties, a prover and a verifier, exchange messages to convince the verifier that the prover followed the protocol correctly (if indeed the prover did so) without revealing any private information to the verifier. It is often desirable to create a non-interactive zero-knowledge proof (NIZK), where the prover only sends one message to the verifier. NIZKs have found a number of different applications, which makes them an attractive object of study. A NIZK has a variety of different properties, and improving any of these aspects advances our collective cryptographic knowledge. In the first paper in this thesis, we construct a new non-interactive zero-knowledge proof for languages based on algebraic sets. This paper is based on work by Couteau and Hartmann (Crypto 2020), which showed how to convert a particular interactive zero-knowledge proof to a NIZK. We follow their approach, but we start with a different interactive zero-knowledge proof. This leads to an improvement compared to their work in several ways, in particular in terms of both assumptions and efficiency. In the second paper in this thesis, we study the property of subversion zero-knowledge in non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs. It is impossible to create a NIZK without relying on a common reference string (CRS) generated by a trusted party. However, a NIZK with the subversion zero-knowledge property guarantees that no one learns any private information from the proof even if the CRS was generated dishonestly. In this paper, we create a new cryptographic primitive (verifiably-extractable one-way functions) and show how this primitive relates to NIZKs with subversion zero-knowledge.Doktorgradsavhandlin

On the (In)security of the Fiat-Shamir Paradigm, Revisited

The Fiat-Shamir paradigm [CRYPTO\u2786] is a heuristic for converting 3-round identification schemes into signature schemes, and more generally, for collapsing rounds in public-coin interactive protocols. This heuristic is very popular both in theory and in practice, and many researchers have studied its security (and insecurity). In this work, we continue this study. As our main result, we show that for many well studied interactive *proofs* (and arguments) the soundness of the Fiat-Shamir heuristic cannot be proven via a black-box reduction to any falsifiable assumption. Previously, the insecurity of this paradigm was exemplified only when applied to interactive arguments (as opposed to proofs). Using similar techniques, we also show a black-box impossibility result for Micali\u27s CS-proofs [FOCS\u2794]. Namely, we prove that there exist PCPs such that for sufficiently hard\u27\u27 NP languages, Micali\u27s CS-proof cannot be proven sound via black-box reduction to any falsifiable assumption. These results are obtained by extending the impossibility of two-message zero knowledge protocols due to Goldreich and Oren [J. Cryptology\u2794]

Set (Non-)Membership NIZKs from Determinantal Accumulators

We construct a falsifiable set (non-)membership NIZK $\Pi^*$ that is considerably more efficient than known falsifiable set (non-)membership NIZKs. It also has a universal CRS. $\Pi^*$ is based on the novel concept of determinantal accumulators. Determinantal primitives have a similar relation to recent pairing-based (non-succinct) NIZKs of Couteau and Hartmann (Crypto 2020) and Couteau et al. (CLPØ, Asiacrypt 2021) that structure-preserving primitives have to the Groth-Sahai NIZK. We also extend CLPØ by proposing efficient (non-succinct) set non-membership arguments for a large class of languages

Constant-Round Concurrent Zero-Knowledge From Falsifiable Assumptions

We present a constant-round concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for \NP. Our protocol is sound against uniform polynomial-time attackers, and relies on the existence of families of collision-resistant hash functions, and a new (but in our eyes, natural) falsifiable intractability assumption: Roughly speaking, that Micali's non-interactive CS-proofs are sound for languages in $\P$