Separating Regular Languages by Locally Testable and Locally Threshold Testable Languages

A separator for two languages is a third language containing the first one and disjoint from the second one. We investigate the following decision problem: given two regular input languages, decide whether there exists a locally testable (resp. a locally threshold testable) separator. In both cases, we design a decision procedure based on the occurrence of special patterns in automata accepting the input languages. We prove that the problem is computationally harder than deciding membership. The correctness proof of the algorithm yields a stronger result, namely a description of a possible separator. Finally, we discuss the same problem for context-free input languages

A Characterization for Decidable Separability by Piecewise Testable Languages

The separability problem for word languages of a class $\mathcal{C}$ by languages of a class $\mathcal{S}$ asks, for two given languages $I$ and $E$ from $\mathcal{C}$, whether there exists a language $S$ from $\mathcal{S}$ that includes $I$ and excludes $E$, that is, $I \subseteq S$ and $S\cap E = \emptyset$. In this work, we assume some mild closure properties for $\mathcal{C}$ and study for which such classes separability by a piecewise testable language (PTL) is decidable. We characterize these classes in terms of decidability of (two variants of) an unboundedness problem. From this, we deduce that separability by PTL is decidable for a number of language classes, such as the context-free languages and languages of labeled vector addition systems. Furthermore, it follows that separability by PTL is decidable if and only if one can compute for any language of the class its downward closure wrt. the scattered substring ordering (i.e., if the set of scattered substrings of any language of the class is effectively regular). The obtained decidability results contrast some undecidability results. In fact, for all (non-regular) language classes that we present as examples with decidable separability, it is undecidable whether a given language is a PTL itself. Our characterization involves a result of independent interest, which states that for any kind of languages $I$ and $E$, non-separability by PTL is equivalent to the existence of common patterns in $I$ and $E$

On Varieties of Automata Enriched with an Algebraic Structure (Extended Abstract)

Eilenberg correspondence, based on the concept of syntactic monoids, relates varieties of regular languages with pseudovarieties of finite monoids. Various modifications of this correspondence related more general classes of regular languages with classes of more complex algebraic objects. Such generalized varieties also have natural counterparts formed by classes of finite automata equipped with a certain additional algebraic structure. In this survey, we overview several variants of such varieties of enriched automata.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527

Separating Regular Languages with First-Order Logic

Given two languages, a separator is a third language that contains the first one and is disjoint from the second one. We investigate the following decision problem: given two regular input languages of finite words, decide whether there exists a first-order definable separator. We prove that in order to answer this question, sufficient information can be extracted from semigroups recognizing the input languages, using a fixpoint computation. This yields an EXPTIME algorithm for checking first-order separability. Moreover, the correctness proof of this algorithm yields a stronger result, namely a description of a possible separator. Finally, we generalize this technique to answer the same question for regular languages of infinite words

Separability by Short Subsequences and Subwords

The separability problem for regular languages asks, given two regular languages I and E, whether there exists a language S that separates the two, that is, includes I but contains nothing from E. Typically, S comes from a simple, less expressive class of languages than I and E. In general, a simple separator $S$ can be seen as an approximation of I or as an explanation of how I and E are different. In a database context, separators can be used for explaining the result of regular path queries or for finding explanations for the difference between paths in a graph database, that is, how paths from given nodes u_1 to v_1 are different from those from u_2 to v_2. We study the complexity of separability of regular languages by combinations of subsequences or subwords of a given length k. The rationale is that the parameter k can be used to influence the size and simplicity of the separator. The emphasis of our study is on tracing the tractability of the problem

Regular Separability of Parikh Automata

We investigate a subclass of languages recognized by vector addition systems, namely languages of nondeterministic Parikh automata. While the regularity problem (is the language of a given automaton regular?) is undecidable for this model, we surprisingly show decidability of the regular separability problem: given two Parikh automata, is there a regular language that contains one of them and is disjoint from the other? We supplement this result by proving undecidability of the same problem already for languages of visibly one counter automata

Separability of Reachability Sets of Vector Addition Systems

Given two families of sets F and G, the F-separability problem for G asks whether for two given sets U, V in G there exists a set S in F, such that U is included in S and V is disjoint with S. We consider two families of sets F: modular sets S which are subsets of N^d, defined as unions of equivalence classes modulo some natural number n in N, and unary sets, which extend modular sets by requiring equality below a threshold n, and equivalence modulo n above n. Our main result is decidability of modular- and unary-separability for the class G of reachability sets of Vector Addition Systems, Petri Nets, Vector Addition Systems with States, and for sections thereof

Une approche combinatoire du problème de séparation pour les langages réguliers

The separation problem, for a class S of languages, is the following: given two input languages, does there exist a language in S that contains the first language and that is disjoint from the second langage ?For regular input languages, the separation problem for a class S subsumes the classical membership problem for this class, and provides more detailed information about the class. This separation problem first emerged in an algebraic context in the form of pointlike sets, and in a profinite context as a topological separation problem. These problems have been studied for specific classes of languages, using involved techniques from the theory of profinite semigroups.In this thesis, we are not only interested in showing the decidability of the separation problem for several subclasses of the regular languages, but also in constructing a separating language, if it exists, and in the complexity of these problems.We provide a generic approach, based on combinatorial arguments, to proving the decidability of this problem for a given class. Using this approach, we prove that the separation problem is decidable for the classes of piecewise testable languages, unambiguous languages, and locally (threshold) testable languages. These classes are defined by different fragments of first-order logic, and are among the most studied classes of regular languages. Furthermore, our approach yields a description of a separating language, in case it exists.Le problème de séparation pour une classe de langages S est le suivant : étant donnés deux langages L1 et L2, existe-t-il un langage appartenant à S qui contient L1, en étant disjoint de L2 ? Si les langages à séparer sont des langages réguliers, le problème de séparation pour la classe S est plus général que le problème de l'appartenance à cette classe, et nous fournit des informations plus détaillées sur la classe. Ce problème de séparation apparaît dans un contexte algébrique sous la forme des parties ponctuelles, et dans un contexte profini sous la forme d'un problème de séparation topologique. Pour quelques classes de langages spécifiques, ce problème a été étudié en utilisant des méthodes profondes de la théorie des semigroupes profinis.Dans cette thèse, on s'intéresse, dans un premier temps, à la décidabilité de ce problème pour plusieurs sous-classes des langages réguliers. Dans un second temps, on s'intéresse à obtenir un langage séparateur, s'il existe, ainsi qu'à la complexité de ces problèmes.Nous établissons une approche générique pour prouver que le problème de séparation est décidable pour une classe de langages donnée. En utilisant cette approche, nous obtenons la décidabilité du problème de séparation pour les langages testables par morceaux, les langages non-ambigus, les langages localement testables, et les langages localement testables à seuil. Ces classes correspondent à des fragments de la logique du premier ordre, et sont parmi lesclasses de langages réguliers les plus étudiées. De plus, cette approche donne une description d'un langage séparateur, pourvu qu'il existe