942 research outputs found

    Risk assessment for progression of Diabetic Nephropathy based on patient history analysis

    Get PDF
    A nefropatia diabรฉtica (ND) รฉ uma das complicaรงรตes mais comuns em doentes com diabetes. Trata-se de uma doenรงa crรณnica que afeta progressivamente os rins, podendo resultar numa insuficiรชncia renal. A digitalizaรงรฃo permitiu aos hospitais armazenar as informaรงรตes dos doentes em registos de saรบde eletrรณnicos (RSE). A aplicaรงรฃo de algoritmos de Machine Learning (ML) a estes dados pode permitir a previsรฃo do risco na evoluรงรฃo destes doentes, conduzindo a uma melhor gestรฃo da doenรงa. O principal objetivo deste trabalho รฉ criar um modelo preditivo que tire partido do historial do doente presente nos RSE. Foi aplicado neste trabalho o maior conjunto de dados de doentes portugueses com DN, seguidos durante 22 anos pela Associaรงรฃo Protetora dos Diabรฉticos de Portugal (APDP). Foi desenvolvida uma abordagem longitudinal na fase de prรฉ-processamento de dados, permitindo que estes fossem servidos como entrada para dezasseis algoritmos de ML distintos. Apรณs a avaliaรงรฃo e anรกlise dos respetivos resultados, o Light Gradient Boosting Machine foi identificado como o melhor modelo, apresentando boas capacidades de previsรฃo. Esta conclusรฃo foi apoiada nรฃo sรณ pela avaliaรงรฃo de vรกrias mรฉtricas de classificaรงรฃo em dados de treino, teste e validaรงรฃo, mas tambรฉm pela avaliaรงรฃo do seu desempenho por cada estรกdio da doenรงa. Para alรฉm disso, os modelos foram analisados utilizando grรกficos de feature ranking e atravรฉs de anรกlise estatรญstica. Como complemento, sรฃo ainda apresentados a interpretabilidade dos resultados atravรฉs do mรฉtodo SHAP, assim como a distribuiรงรฃo do modelo utilizando o Gradio e os servidores da Hugging Face. Atravรฉs da integraรงรฃo de tรฉcnicas ML, de um mรฉtodo de interpretaรงรฃo e de uma aplicaรงรฃo Web que fornece acesso ao modelo, este estudo oferece uma abordagem potencialmente eficaz para antecipar a evoluรงรฃo da ND, permitindo que os profissionais de saรบde tomem decisรตes informadas para a prestaรงรฃo de cuidados personalizados e gestรฃo da doenรงa

    Common gene signatures and molecular mechanisms of diabetic nephropathy and metabolic syndrome

    Get PDF
    BackgroundDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Multiple metabolic toxicities, redox stress, and endothelial dysfunction contribute to the development of diabetic glomerulosclerosis and DN. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a pathological state in which the bodyโ€™s ability to process carbohydrates, fats, and proteins is compromised because of metabolic disorders, resulting in redox stress and renal remodeling. However, a causal relationship between MetS and DN has not been proven. This study aimed to provide valuable information for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MetS with DN.MethodsHere, transcriptome data of DN and MetS patients were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and seven potential biomarkers were screened using bioinformatics analysis. In addition, the relationship between these marker genes and metabolism and immune infiltration was explored. Among the identified marker genes, the relationship between PLEKHA1 and the cellular process, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), in DN was further investigated through single-cell analysis.ResultsWe found that PLEKHA1 may represent an important biomarker that perhaps initiates DN by activating B cells, proximal tubular cells, distal tubular cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells, thereby inducing OXPHOS in renal monocytes.ConclusionOverall, our findings can aid in further investigation of the effects of drug treatment on single cells of patients with diabetes to validate PLEKHA1 as a therapeutic target and to inform the development of targeted therapies

    ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ๊ด€๋ จ ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „ํ•™ ์ง€ํ‘œ ๋ฐœ๊ตด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋ณด๊ฑด๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ์„ฑ์ฃผํ—Œ.์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋Š” ์ทŒ์žฅ์˜ ๋ฒ ํƒ€ ์„ธํฌ (beta cell)์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์žฅ์• ์™€ ์ธ์Š๋ฆฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ณ ํ˜ˆ๋‹น์ฆ์„ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋งŒ์„ฑ์งˆํ™˜์ด๋‹ค. ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ์œ ๋ณ‘๋ฅ ์€ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ 12.4%์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋Š” ์œ ์ „์  ์š”์ธ๊ณผ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์  ์š”์ธ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋‘ ์š”์ธ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ถ”์ •์œ ์ „์œจ์ด 25~69%์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ „์žฅ์œ ์ „์ฒด๋ถ„์„ (Genome-wide association study, GWAS)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•œ ๋ณ€์ด (genetic variants)๋Š” ์ถ”์ • ์œ ์ „์œจ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋งŒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ๋ฟ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์œ ์ „์  ์š”์ธ๊ณผ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์  ์š”์ธ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „ํ•™์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „(Epigenetics)๋Š” DNA ์—ผ๊ธฐ์„œ์—ด์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์—†์ด ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ์• ์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ ์ธ ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ „์€ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” (DNAm)์™€ ํžˆ์Šคํ†ค ๋ณ€ํ˜• (Histone modification)์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „ํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์œ„ํ—˜์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๊ณ ํ˜ˆ๋‹น์—์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ์ด DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๊ณ  ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋Š” โ€˜๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๊ธฐ์–ต (metabolic memory)โ€™ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ์ œ๊ธฐ๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์—์„œ์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ์—์„œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์™€ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜ (Diabetic kidney disease, DKD) ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ตดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ์ง€ํ‘œ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ(metabolic trait)๊ณผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ „์žฅ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋ถ„์„ (Methylome-wide association study)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ์œ ๋ณ‘์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ์ง€ํ‘œ๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด ์ ์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ 10๋…„๊ฐ„ ์ถ”์  ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•œ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ์„œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์ด ์ฐจ๋“ฑ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ด ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ํŠน์ด์  DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ถ„์„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜ ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ด์–ด์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ/๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋งˆ์ปค์™€ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€, ์ธ๊ณผ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ด ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์—์„œ์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ง์ดˆ ํ˜ˆ์•ก ๋ฐฑํ˜ˆ๊ตฌ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์—์„œ DNA๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ํ›„, KoGES ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ์˜ 356 ๋ช…๊ณผ HTS ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋Š” Illumina ์‚ฌ์˜ Infinium HumanMethylation 450 BeadChip์œผ๋กœ ์–ด์„ธ์ด ๋˜์–ด ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋‚ด ์•ฝ 450,000 ๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์œ„์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ผ๋ถ€ HTS ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์™€ ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€๋ณ‘์› ๋‹น๋‡จ ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋“ค์€ Illumina ์‚ฌ์˜ Infinium Methylation Epic Beadchip์œผ๋กœ ์–ด์„ธ์ด๋˜์–ด ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋‚ด ์ด 850,000๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ Infinium HumanMethylation 450 BeadChip์œผ๋กœ ์–ด์„ธ์ด ๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋“ค์€ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋งˆ์ปค ๋Œ€์น˜ (imputation) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ โ€˜methylImpโ€™๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๋งˆ์ปค๋“ค๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์›๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๋Œ€์น˜๋˜์–ด ์ด 850,000๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋งˆ์ปค๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 197๋ช…์˜ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์™€ 232๋ช…์˜ ๋น„ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€-๋Œ€์กฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„ (์„œ์šธ๋Œ€๋ณ‘์› ๋‹น๋‡จ ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ)์—์„œ ์ „์žฅ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ์—ฐ๊ด€๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์€ 87๋ช…์˜ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์™€ 80๋ช…์˜ ๋น„๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜๊ตฐ (์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ์œ ๋ณ‘ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ 10๋…„ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ํ™˜์ž๋กœ ํ™˜์žฅ)์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ๊ฐ€์กฑ-์Œ๋‘ฅ์ด (HTS) ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ ๋ฐ ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ์œ ์ „์ฒด์—ญํ•™์กฐ์‚ฌ์‚ฌ์—… (KoGES) ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ์˜ 2 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ 819 ๋ช…์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ง€ํ‘œ์™€ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ง€ํ‘œ์˜ ์ธ๊ณผ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉ˜๋ธ๋ฆฌ์•ˆ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋ถ„์„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (Mendelian randomization, MR)์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์˜ 8 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์˜์—ญ (Differentially methylated site, DMS) (๊ฐ๊ฐ BMP8A, NBPF20, STX18, ZNF365, CPT1A, TRIM37 ๋ฐ TXNIP์—์„œ 2 ๊ฐœ)์„ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’(P <9.0x10-8)์—์„œ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด ์ค‘ TXNIP๊ณผ CPT1A์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•œ 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ™•์ธ๋œ ์˜์—ญ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 8๊ฐœ์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋งˆ์ปค๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ DNAm ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋ณ„๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, DNAm ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ 1๋ถ„์œ„์™€ 10๋ถ„์œ„์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ์œ„ํ—˜์ด 2.86 (95% ์‹ ๋ขฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„ 1.10-7.44) ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ „์žฅ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์—ฐ๊ด€๋ถ„์„์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ์ „ํ–ฅ ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ (KoGES)์—์„œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ๋งˆ์ปค์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฉ˜๋ธ๋ฆฌ์•ˆ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ์€ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘์— ์ธ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ด์šฉ๋œ ๋‚ด์ƒ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ •๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ „์ž์ขŒ (methylation quantitative loci, mQTL)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ์ค‘ ์„ ํ–‰๋œ ์ „์žฅ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์™€ ๋Œ€์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋‹จ์ผ์—ผ๊ธฐ๋‹คํ˜•์„ฑ (Single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP)์ด ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ •๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ „์ž์ขŒ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์— ๊ต๋ž€ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. CPT1A ๋ฐ TXNIP์˜ DMR์€ ๊ณต๋ณต ํ˜ˆ๋‹น, HbA1c ๋ฐ ์ฒด์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ CPT1A์˜ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”๋Š” ๊ณต๋ณต ํ˜ˆ๋‹น์— ์ธ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 167๋ช…์˜ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž ๋ฐ ๋น„ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ์‹ ์ฆ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ ์ „์žฅ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์—ฐ๊ด€๋ถ„์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์˜์—ญ(COMMD1, TMOD1 ๋ฐ FHOD1)์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ์€ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜๋ฏธ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์˜์—ญ์€ ์œ ์ „๋ณ€์ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ์„ค๋ช… ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฉ˜๋ธ๋ฆฌ์•ˆ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„๋ถ„์„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์— ์ธ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์‚ฌ๊ตฌ์ฒด ์—ฌ๊ณผ์œจ (eGFR)์€ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณผ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋™์•„์‹œ์•„ ์ธ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ 8 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’ (P <9.0x10-8)์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด ์ค‘ 5๊ฐœ๋Š” ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ DNA ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™” ์ง€ํ‘œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์˜์—ญ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์„ฑ ์‹ ์žฅ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ํ›„์„ฑ์œ ์ „ํ•™์  ๊ธฐ์ „์ด ์ œ2ํ˜• ๋‹น๋‡จ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ „๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Objective: There is growing body of evidence that epigenetic changes including DNA methylation (DNAm) influence the risk of type 2 diabetes and its microvascular complications. We conducted a methylome-wide association study (MWAS) to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in Korean population. Methods: We performed an initial MWAS in 232 participants in a case-control study design with type 2 diabetes and 197 non-diabetic controls with Illumina EPIC bead chip using peripheral blood leukocytes. Type 2 diabetes group was subdivided to 87 DKD cases and 80 non-DKD controls. Additional 819 individuals from two population-based cohorts were used to investigate the association of the identified DMRs with quantitative metabolic traits. We developed a DNAm score using identified DMRs to predict the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. To examine the causal relationship between differentially methylated CpGs and type 2 diabetes/DKD and between the metabolic traits and differentially methylated status, we performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Results: We identified eight DMRs (each at BMP8A, NBPF20, STX18, ZNF365, CPT1A, and TRIM37, and two at TXNIP) which were significantly associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (P < 9.0ร—10-8), including three that were previously known (DMRs in TXNIP and CPT1A), in 429 type 2 diabetes cases and controls. DNAm score consisted of these DMRs differentiated the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in an independent prospective cohort with a relative risk of 2.86 (95% CI 1.10-7.44) between the lowest and highest deciles of DNAm score. DMRs in CPT1A and TXNIP were associated with quantitative metabolic traits, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, and body mass index. DMRs of type 2 diabetes have little methylation quantitative loci (mQTL), and not causally associated with type 2 diabetes. Three DMSs of type 2 diabetes (cg26823705, cg08867893, and cg17082373) affect the increase of HbA1c level. We also identified three DMRs (on COMMD1, TMOD1, and FHOD1) associated with DKD in 167 DKD cases and controls. DMRs of DKD did not show meaningful overlap with those of type 2 diabetes. DKD was causally affected by methylation changes of DMRs of DKD, which was highly influenced by genetics. In MR analysis, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was causally associated with DNAm of these three DMRs. Conclusions: In an East Asian population, we identified eight DMRs, including five novel ones, associated with type 2 diabetes and three DMRs associated with DKD at methylome-wide statistical significance. Our findings suggest that epigenetic machinery of DKD may be different from that are responsible for the development of T2D.I. Introduction: Epigenetics, Epigenetic markers and Type 2 diabetes 11 1. Overview of epigenetics 11 1.1. Epigenetics and DNA methylation 11 1.2. Environmental exposures trigger epigenetic change 12 1.3. DNA methylation profiling 13 1.4. Characteristic of DNA methylome data for Methylome-wide association study (MWAS) 14 2. Epigenetics and type 2 diabetes 16 2.1. Epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes 16 2.2. DNAm changes in type 2 diabetes 17 2.3. Metabolic memories of diabetic complication, DKD 18 2.4. Genetic influences on DMRs 19 3. Imputation of DNA methylation markers 21 3.1. Review of DNA methylation imputation methods 21 3.2. Imputation of DNA methylation population datasets 24 4. Objectives 26 II. MWAS of type 2 diabetes and Verifying markers 28 1. Material and methods 28 1.1. Study design and population 28 1.2. DNA methylation profiling 29 1.3. Removing Batch effect 30 1.4. MWAS of type 2 diabetes 31 1.5. Prediction of type 2 diabetes using the DNAm score 32 1.6. Prediction of type 2 diabetes prevalence using the DNA methylation 32 1.7. Causal analysis of DNA methylation to Type 2 diabetes 33 1.8. The phenotypic variance explained by DNA methylation 34 2. Results 35 2.1. Clinical characteristics of the study participants 35 2.2. Differentially methylated regions of type 2 diabetes 35 2.3. Prediction of the risk of type 2 diabetes using the DNAm score 36 2.4. Prediction of prevalence of type 2 diabetes using the DNA methylation 37 2.5. The causal effect of DNA methylation on type 2 diabetes 37 2.6. The phenotypic variance explained by DNA methylation 38 3. Discussion 38 III. MWAS of Diabetic Complication, DKD 70 1. Method and materials 70 1.1. Study design and participants 70 1.2. MWAS of DKD 70 1.3. The causal effect of DNA methylation on DKD 71 2. Results 73 2.1. Clinical characteristics of the study participants 73 2.2. Differentially methylated regions of DKD 73 2.3. The causal effect of DNA methylation on DKD 74 3. Discussion 75 IV. Causal Analysis of Differentially Methylated Regions Associated with type 2 diabetes/DKD 100 1. Methods and materials 100 1.1. Study participants 100 1.2. DNA profiling 100 1.3. Genotyping the data 100 1.4. Association with quantitative metabolic traits 101 1.5. MR analysis 102 2. Results 103 2.1. Association of identified DMSs with metabolic traits 103 2.2. Causal association of metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes/DKD with CpG methylation 104 2.3. Causal association of CpG methylation with metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes/DKD 105 3. Discussion 106 V. Overall summary and Conclusion 144 VI. References 152 VII. ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 160๋ฐ•

    Applying machine learning to predict adipose browning capacity and mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum crosstalk

    Get PDF

    Analysis for warning factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus complications with Markov blanket based on a Bayesian network model

    Get PDF
    Background and objective Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications seriously affect the quality of life and could not be cured completely. Actions should be taken for prevention and self-management. Analysis of warning factors is beneficial for patients, on which some previous studies focused. They generally used the professional medical test factors or complete factors to predict and prevent, but it was inconvenient and impractical for patients to self-manage. With this in mind, this study built a Bayesian network (BN) model, from the perspective of diabetic patientsโ€™ self-management and prevention, to predict six complications of T2DM using the selected warning factors which patients could have access from medical examination. Furthermore, the model was analyzed to explore the relationships between physiological variables and T2DM complications, as well as the complications themselves. The model aims to help patients with T2DM self-manage and prevent themselves from complications. Methods The dataset was collected from a well-known data center called the National Health Clinical Center between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2009. After preprocess and impute the data, a BN model merging expert knowledge was built with Bootstrap and Tabu search algorithm. Markov Blanket (MB) was used to select the warning factors and predict T2DM complications. Moreover, a Bayesian network without prior information (BN-wopi) model learned using 10-fold cross-validation both in structure and in parameters was added to compare with other classifiers learned using 10-fold cross-validation fairly. The warning factors were selected according the structure learned in each fold and were used to predict. Finally, the performance of two BN models using warning features were compared with Naรฏve Bayes model, Random Forest model, and C5.0 Decision Tree model, which used all features to predict. Besides, the validation parameters of the proposed model were also compared with those in existing studies using some other variables in clinical data or biomedical data to predict T2DM complications. Results Experimental results indicated that the BN models using warning factors performed statistically better than their counterparts using all other variables in predicting T2DM complications. In addition, the proposed BN model were effective and significant in predicting diabetic nephropathy (DN) (AUC: 0.831), diabetic foot (DF) (AUC: 0.905), diabetic macrovascular complications (DMV) (AUC: 0.753) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DK) (AUC: 0.877) with the selected warning factors compared with other experiments. Conclusions The warning factors of DN, DF, DMV, and DK selected by MB in this research might be able to help predict certain T2DM complications effectively, and the proposed BN model might be used as a general tool for prevention, monitoring, and self-management

    Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/non-COVID-19 Frameworks using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review

    Get PDF
    Diabetes is one of the main causes of the rising cases of blindness in adults. This microvascular complication of diabetes is termed diabetic retinopathy (DR) and is associated with an expanding risk of cardiovascular events in diabetes patients. DR, in its various forms, is seen to be a powerful indicator of atherosclerosis. Further, the macrovascular complication of diabetes leads to coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the timely identification of cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications in DR patients is of utmost importance. Since CAD risk assessment is expensive for lowincome countries, it is important to look for surrogate biomarkers for risk stratification of CVD in DR patients. Due to the common genetic makeup between the coronary and carotid arteries, lowcost, high-resolution imaging such as carotid B-mode ultrasound (US) can be used for arterial tissue characterization and risk stratification in DR patients. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques has facilitated the handling of large cohorts in a big data framework to identify atherosclerotic plaque features in arterial ultrasound. This enables timely CVD risk assessment and risk stratification of patients with DR. Thus, this review focuses on understanding the pathophysiology of DR, retinal and CAD imaging, the role of surrogate markers for CVD, and finally, the CVD risk stratification of DR patients. The review shows a step-by-step cyclic activity of how diabetes and atherosclerotic disease cause DR, leading to the worsening of CVD. We propose a solution to how AI can help in the identification of CVD risk. Lastly, we analyze the role of DR/CVD in the COVID-19 framework

    CAD system for early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy based on 3D extracted imaging markers.

    Get PDF
    This dissertation makes significant contributions to the field of ophthalmology, addressing the segmentation of retinal layers and the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The first contribution is a novel 3D segmentation approach that leverages the patientspecific anatomy of retinal layers. This approach demonstrates superior accuracy in segmenting all retinal layers from a 3D retinal image compared to current state-of-the-art methods. It also offers enhanced speed, enabling potential clinical applications. The proposed segmentation approach holds great potential for supporting surgical planning and guidance in retinal procedures such as retinal detachment repair or macular hole closure. Surgeons can benefit from the accurate delineation of retinal layers, enabling better understanding of the anatomical structure and more effective surgical interventions. Moreover, real-time guidance systems can be developed to assist surgeons during procedures, improving overall patient outcomes. The second contribution of this dissertation is the introduction of a novel computeraided diagnosis (CAD) system for precise identification of diabetic retinopathy. The CAD system utilizes 3D-OCT imaging and employs an innovative approach that extracts two distinct features: first-order reflectivity and 3D thickness. These features are then fused and used to train and test a neural network classifier. The proposed CAD system exhibits promising results, surpassing other machine learning and deep learning algorithms commonly employed in DR detection. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the comprehensive analysis approach employed by the CAD system, which considers both low-level and high-level data from the 3D retinal layers. The CAD system presents a groundbreaking contribution to the field, as it goes beyond conventional methods, optimizing backpropagated neural networks to integrate multiple levels of information effectively. By achieving superior performance, the proposed CAD system showcases its potential in accurately diagnosing DR and aiding in the prevention of vision loss. In conclusion, this dissertation presents novel approaches for the segmentation of retinal layers and the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. The proposed methods exhibit significant improvements in accuracy, speed, and performance compared to existing techniques, opening new avenues for clinical applications and advancements in the field of ophthalmology. By addressing future research directions, such as testing on larger datasets, exploring alternative algorithms, and incorporating user feedback, the proposed methods can be further refined and developed into robust, accurate, and clinically valuable tools for diagnosing and monitoring retinal diseases

    Elucidating causal relationships between energy homeostasis and cardiometabolic outcomes

    Get PDF
    Energy metabolism dyshomeostasis is associated with multiple health problems. For example, abundant epidemiological data show that obesity and overweight increase the risk of cardiometabolic diseases and early mortality. Type 2 diabetes (T2D), characterized by chronically elevated blood glucose, is also associated with debilitating complications, high healthcare costs and mortality, with cardiovascular complications accounting for more than half of T2D-related deaths. Prediabetes, which is defined as elevated blood glucose below the diagnostic threshold for T2D, affects approximately 350M people worldwide, with about 35-50% developing T2D within 5 years. Further, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, a form of ectopic fat deposition as a result of energy imbalance, is associated with increased risk of T2D, CVD and hepatocellular carcinoma. Determination of causal relationships between phenotypes related to positive energy balance and disease outcomes, as well as elucidation of the nature of these relationships, may help inform public health intervention policies. In addition, utilizing big data and machine learning (ML) approaches can improve prediction of outcomes related to excess adiposity both for research purposes and eventual validation and clinical translation. AimsIn paper 1, I set out to summarize observational evidence and further determine the causal relationships between prediabetes and common vascular complications associated with T2D i.e., coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke and renal disease. In paper 2, I studied the association between LRIG1 genetic variants and BMI, T2D and lipid biomarkers. In paper 3, we used ML to identify novel molecular features associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In paper 4, I elucidate the nature of causal relationships between BMI and cardiometabolic traits and investigate sex differences within the causal framework.ResultsPrediabetes was associated with CAD and stroke but not renal disease in observational analyses, whilst in the causal inference analyses, prediabetes was only associated with CAD. Common LRIG1 variant (rs4856886) was associated with increased BMI and lipid hyperplasia but a decreased risk of T2D. In paper 3, models using common clinical variables showed strong NAFLD prediction ability (ROCAUC = 0.73, p < 0.001); addition of hepatic and glycemic biomarkers and omics data to these models strengthened predictive power (ROCAUC = 0.84, p < 0.001). Finally, there was evidence of non-linearity in the causal effect of BMI on T2D and CAD, biomarkers and blood pressure. The causal effects BMI on CAD were different in men and women, though this difference did no hold after Bonferroni correction. ConclusionWe show that derangements in energy homeostasis are causally associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic outcomes and that early intervention on perturbed glucose control and excess adiposity may help prevent these adverse health outcomes. In addition, effects of novel LRIG1 genetic variants on BMI and T2D might enrich our understanding of lipid metabolism and T2D and thus warrant further investigations. Finally, application of ML to multidimensional data improves prediction of NAFLD; similar approaches could be used in other disease research

    From Disease Association to Risk Assessment: An Optimistic View from Genome-Wide Association Studies on Type 1 Diabetes

    Get PDF
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been fruitful in identifying disease susceptibility loci for common and complex diseases. A remaining question is whether we can quantify individual disease risk based on genotype data, in order to facilitate personalized prevention and treatment for complex diseases. Previous studies have typically failed to achieve satisfactory performance, primarily due to the use of only a limited number of confirmed susceptibility loci. Here we propose that sophisticated machine-learning approaches with a large ensemble of markers may improve the performance of disease risk assessment. We applied a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm on a GWAS dataset generated on the Affymetrix genotyping platform for type 1 diabetes (T1D) and optimized a risk assessment model with hundreds of markers. We subsequently tested this model on an independent Illumina-genotyped dataset with imputed genotypes (1,008 cases and 1,000 controls), as well as a separate Affymetrix-genotyped dataset (1,529 cases and 1,458 controls), resulting in area under ROC curve (AUC) of โˆผ0.84 in both datasets. In contrast, poor performance was achieved when limited to dozens of known susceptibility loci in the SVM model or logistic regression model. Our study suggests that improved disease risk assessment can be achieved by using algorithms that take into account interactions between a large ensemble of markers. We are optimistic that genotype-based disease risk assessment may be feasible for diseases where a notable proportion of the risk has already been captured by SNP arrays
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore