340 research outputs found

    Adaptive Hidden Markov Noise Modelling for Speech Enhancement

    Get PDF
    A robust and reliable noise estimation algorithm is required in many speech enhancement systems. The aim of this thesis is to propose and evaluate a robust noise estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary noisy environments. In this work, we model the non-stationary noise using a set of discrete states with each state representing a distinct noise power spectrum. In this approach, the state sequence over time is conveniently represented by a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). In this thesis, we first present an online HMM re-estimation framework that models time-varying noise using a Hidden Markov Model and tracks changes in noise characteristics by a sequential model update procedure that tracks the noise characteristics during the absence of speech. In addition the algorithm will when necessary create new model states to represent novel noise spectra and will merge existing states that have similar characteristics. We then extend our work in robust noise estimation during speech activity by incorporating a speech model into our existing noise model. The noise characteristics within each state are updated based on a speech presence probability which is derived from a modified Minima controlled recursive averaging method. We have demonstrated the effectiveness of our noise HMM in tracking both stationary and highly non-stationary noise, and shown that it gives improved performance over other conventional noise estimation methods when it is incorporated into a standard speech enhancement algorithm

    Speech Modeling and Robust Estimation for Diagnosis of Parkinsonโ€™s Disease

    Get PDF

    Speech dereverberation for enhancement and recognition using dynamic features constrained deep neural networks and feature adaptation

    Get PDF
    This paper investigates deep neural networks (DNN) based on nonlinear feature mapping and statistical linear feature adaptation approaches for reducing reverberation in speech signals. In the nonlinear feature mapping approach, DNN is trained from parallel clean/distorted speech corpus to map reverberant and noisy speech coefficients (such as log magnitude spectrum) to the underlying clean speech coefficients. The constraint imposed by dynamic features (i.e., the time derivatives of the speech coefficients) are used to enhance the smoothness of predicted coefficient trajectories in two ways. One is to obtain the enhanced speech coefficients with a least square estimation from the coefficients and dynamic features predicted by DNN. The other is to incorporate the constraint of dynamic features directly into the DNN training process using a sequential cost function. In the linear feature adaptation approach, a sparse linear transform, called cross transform, is used to transform multiple frames of speech coefficients to a new feature space. The transform is estimated to maximize the likelihood of the transformed coefficients given a model of clean speech coefficients. Unlike the DNN approach, no parallel corpus is used and no assumption on distortion types is made. The two approaches are evaluated on the REVERB Challenge 2014 tasks. Both speech enhancement and automatic speech recognition (ASR) results show that the DNN-based mappings significantly reduce the reverberation in speech and improve both speech quality and ASR performance. For the speech enhancement task, the proposed dynamic feature constraint help to improve cepstral distance, frequency-weighted segmental signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and log likelihood ratio metrics while moderately degrades the speech-to-reverberation modulation energy ratio. In addition, the cross transform feature adaptation improves the ASR performance significantly for clean-condition trained acoustic models.Published versio

    Studies on noise robust automatic speech recognition

    Get PDF
    Noise in everyday acoustic environments such as cars, traffic environments, and cafeterias remains one of the main challenges in automatic speech recognition (ASR). As a research theme, it has received wide attention in conferences and scientific journals focused on speech technology. This article collection reviews both the classic and novel approaches suggested for noise robust ASR. The articles are literature reviews written for the spring 2009 seminar course on noise robust automatic speech recognition (course code T-61.6060) held at TKK

    ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•œ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ๊น€๋‚จ์ˆ˜.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ DNN์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” DNN์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์žก์Œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์กฐ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ DNN์€ ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ์Œ์„ฑ, ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ, ์žก์Œ ์ถ”์ •์น˜, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์Œ์†Œ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ Aurora-5 DB ์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์žก์Œ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ ์‘ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ธ ์žก์Œ ์ธ์ง€ ํ•™์Šต (noise-aware training, NAT) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” DNN์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์ง• ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ธ ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์†Œ์Šค ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ delay-and-sum (DS) ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ DNN์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์ง• ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” DNN์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณต๋™ ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ multichannel wall street journal audio visual (MC-WSJAV) corpus์—์„œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹ค์ฑ„๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ถˆํ™•์ •์„ฑ ์ธ์ง€ ํ•™์Šต (Uncertainty-aware training, UAT) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์œ„์—์„œ ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์ ์ธ ์ถ”์ • ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ถ”์ •์น˜์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์ •์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ˜น์€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” UAT ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์ถ”์ •์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‰ด๋Ÿด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋” (variational autoencoder, VAE) ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. UAT๋Š” ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ์Œ์„ฑ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ์™€ ์Œ์†Œ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์€๋‹‰ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •์น˜์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•œ๋‹ค. UAT์˜ ์€๋‹‰ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋”ฅ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ uncertainty decoding (UD) ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ๋„๋œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์šฐ๋„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ•™์Šต๋œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ Aurora-4 DB์™€ CHiME-4 DB์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.In this thesis, we propose three acoustic modeling techniques for robust automatic speech recognition (ASR). Firstly, we propose a DNN-based acoustic modeling technique which makes the best use of the inherent noise-robustness of DNN is proposed. By applying this technique, the DNN can automatically learn the complicated relationship among the noisy, clean speech and noise estimate to phonetic target smoothly. The proposed method outperformed noise-aware training (NAT), i.e., the conventional auxiliary-feature-based model adaptation technique in Aurora-5 DB. The second method is multi-channel feature enhancement technique. In the general multi-channel speech recognition scenario, the enhanced single speech signal source is extracted from the multiple inputs using beamforming, i.e., the conventional signal-processing-based technique and the speech recognition process is performed by feeding that source into the acoustic model. We propose the multi-channel feature enhancement DNN algorithm by properly combining the delay-and-sum (DS) beamformer, which is one of the conventional beamforming techniques and DNN. Through the experiments using multichannel wall street journal audio visual (MC-WSJ-AV) corpus, it has been shown that the proposed method outperformed the conventional multi-channel feature enhancement techniques. Finally, uncertainty-aware training (UAT) technique is proposed. The most of the existing DNN-based techniques including the techniques introduced above, aim to optimize the point estimates of the targets (e.g., clean features, and acoustic model parameters). This tampers with the reliability of the estimates. In order to overcome this issue, UAT employs a modified structure of variational autoencoder (VAE), a neural network model which learns and performs stochastic variational inference (VIF). UAT models the robust latent variables which intervene the mapping between the noisy observed features and the phonetic target using the distributive information of the clean feature estimates. The proposed technique outperforms the conventional DNN-based techniques on Aurora-4 and CHiME-4 databases.Abstract i Contents iv List of Figures ix List of Tables xiii 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 9 2.1 Deep Neural Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Experimental Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Aurora-4 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.2.2 Aurora-5 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.2.3 MC-WSJ-AV DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.4 CHiME-4 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3 Two-stage Noise-aware Training for Environment-robust Speech Recognition 25 iii 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.2 Noise-aware Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.3 Two-stage NAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.3.1 Lower DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.3.2 Upper DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.3.3 Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.4.1 GMM-HMM System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.4.2 Training and Structures of DNN-based Techniques . . . . . . 37 3.4.3 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4 DNN-based Feature Enhancement for Robust Multichannel Speech Recognition 45 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2 Observation Model in Multi-Channel Reverberant Noisy Environment 49 4.3 Proposed Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.3.1 Lower DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.3.2 Upper DNN and Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.4.1 Recognition System and Feature Extraction . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4.2 Training and Structures of DNN-based Techniques . . . . . . 58 4.4.3 Dropout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.4.4 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 iv 5 Uncertainty-aware Training for DNN-HMM System using Varia- tional Inference 67 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2 Uncertainty Decoding for Noise Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.3 Variational Autoencoder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.4 VIF-based uncertainty-aware Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.4.1 Clean Uncertainty Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.4.2 Environment Uncertainty Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4.3 Prediction Network and Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.5 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5.1 Experimental Setup: Feature Extraction and ASR System . . 96 5.5.2 Network Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.5.3 Eects of CUN on the Noise Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.5.4 Uncertainty Representation in Dierent SNR Condition . . . 105 5.5.5 Result of Speech Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.5.6 Result of Speech Recognition with LSTM-HMM . . . . . . . 114 5.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6 Conclusions 127 Bibliography 131 ์š”์•ฝ 145Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore