Process expressions and Hoare's logic: showing an irreconcilability of context-free recursion with Scott's induction rule

AbstractIn this paper processes specifiable over a non-uniform language are considered. The language contains constants for a set of atomic actions and constructs for alternative and sequential composition. Furthermore it provides a mechanism for specifying processes recursively (including nested recursion). We consider processes as having a state: atomic actions are to be specified in terms of observable behaviour (relative to initial states) and state transformations. Any process having some initial state can be associated with a transition system representing all possible courses of execution. This leads to an operational semantics in the style of Plotkin. The partial correctness assertion {α} p{β} expresses that for any transition system associated with the process p and having some initial state satisfying α, its final states representing successful execution satisfy β. A logic in the style of Hoare, containing a proof system for deriving partial correctness assertions, is presented. This proof system is sound and relatively complete, so any partial correctness assertion can be evaluated by investigating its derivability. Included is a short discussion about the extension of the process language with “guarded recursion”. It appears that such an extension violates the completeness of the Hoare logic. This reveals a remarkable property of Scott's induction rule in the context of non-determinism: only regular recursion allows a completeness result

Modular specification of process algebras

AbstractThis paper proposes a modular approach to the algebraic specification of process algebras. This is done by means of the notion of a module. The simplest modules are building blocks of operators and axioms, each block describing a feature of concurrency in a certain semantical setting. These modules can then be combined by means of a union operator +, an export operator □, allowing to forget some operators in a module, an operator H, changing semantics by taking homomorphic images, and an operator S which takes subalgebras. These operators enable us to combine modules in a subtle way, when the direct combination would be inconsistent.We give a presentation of equational logic, infinitary conditional equational logic — of which we also prove the completeness — and first-order logic and show how the notion of a formal proof of a formula from a theory can be generalized to that of a proof of a formula from a module. This module logic is then applied in process algebra. We show how auxiliary process algebra operators can be hidden when this is needed. Moreover, we demonstrate how new process combinators can be defined in terms of more elementary ones in a clean way. As an illutration of our approach, we specify some FIFO-queues and verify several of their properties

The state operator in process algebra

+138hlm.;21c