Instances and connectors : issues for a second generation process language

This work is supported by UK EPSRC grants GR/L34433 and GR/L32699Over the past decade a variety of process languages have been defined, used and evaluated. It is now possible to consider second generation languages based on this experience. Rather than develop a second generation wish list this position paper explores two issues: instances and connectors. Instances relate to the relationship between a process model as a description and the, possibly multiple, enacting instances which are created from it. Connectors refers to the issue of concurrency control and achieving a higher level of abstraction in how parts of a model interact. We believe that these issues are key to developing systems which can effectively support business processes, and that they have not received sufficient attention within the process modelling community. Through exploring these issues we also illustrate our approach to designing a second generation process language.Postprin

Instances and connectors : issues for a second generation process language

This work is supported by UK EPSRC grants GR/L34433 and GR/L32699Over the past decade a variety of process languages have been defined, used and evaluated. It is now possible to consider second generation languages based on this experience. Rather than develop a second generation wish list this position paper explores two issues: instances and connectors. Instances relate to the relationship between a process model as a description and the, possibly multiple, enacting instances which are created from it. Connectors refers to the issue of concurrency control and achieving a higher level of abstraction in how parts of a model interact. We believe that these issues are key to developing systems which can effectively support business processes, and that they have not received sufficient attention within the process modelling community. Through exploring these issues we also illustrate our approach to designing a second generation process language.Postprin

Process-based Software Tweaking with Mobile Agents

We describe an approach based upon software process technology to on-the-fly monitoring, redeployment, reconfiguration, and in general adaptation of distributed software applications, in short 'software tweaking'. We choose the term tweaking to refer to modifications in structure and behavior that can be made to individual components, as well as sets thereof, or the overall target system configuration, such as adding, removing or substituting components, while the system is running and without bringing it down. The goal of software tweaking is manifold: supporting run-time software composition, enforcing adherence to requirements, ensuring uptime and quality of service of mission-critical systems, recovering from and preventing faults, seamless system upgrading, etc. Our approach involves dispatching and coordinating software agents - named Worklets - via a process engine, since successful tweaking of a complex distributed software system often requires the concerted action of multiple agents on multiple components. The software tweaking process must incorporate and decide upon knowledge about the specifications and architecture of the target software, as well as Worklets capabilities. Software tweaking is correlated to a variety of other software processes - such as configuration management, deployment, validation and evolution - and allows to address at run time a number of related concerns that are normally dealt with only at development time

The design and implementation of the VRPML support environment.

Proses pembangunan penslan berkait rapat dengan turutan langkah yang mesti dilakukan oleh jurutera perisian untuk memenuhi matlamat kejuruteraan perisian. Untuk menghasilkan proses yang tepat dan lengkap, proses pembangunan perisian boleh dimodel dan dilari menggunakan bahasa pennodelan (PML) dengan dibantu oleh sistem proses bantuan (PSEE). Software processes relate to the sequences of steps that must be performed by software engineers in order to pursue the goals of software engineering. In order to have an accurate representation and implementation of what the actual steps are, software processes may be modeled and enacted by a process modeling language (PML) and its process support system (called the Process Centered Environments i.e. PSEE)

Verifying Properties of Process Definitions

It seems important that the complex processes that synergize humans and computers to solve widening classes of societal problems be subjected to rigorous analysis. One approach is to use a process definition language to specify these processes and to then use analysis techniques to evaluate these definitions for important correctness properties. Because humans demand flexibility in their participation in complex processes, process definition languages must incorporate complicated control structures, such as various concurrency, choice, reactive control, and exception mechanisms. The underlying complexity of these control abstractions, however, often confounds the users’ intuitions as well as complicates any analysis. Thus, the control abstraction complexity in process definition languages presents analysis challenges beyond those posed by traditional programming languages. This paper explores some of the difficulties of analyzing process definitions. We explore issues arising when applying the FLAVERS finite state verification system to processes written in the Little-JIL process definition language and illustrate these issues using a realistic auction example. Although we employ a particular process definition language and analysis technique, our results seem more generally applicable

Specification and Analysis of Resource Utilization Policies for Human-Intensive Systems

Contemporary systems often require the effective support of many types of resources, each governed by complex utilization policies. Sound management of these resources plays a key role in assuring that these systems achieve their key goals. To help system developers make sound resource management decisions, I provide a resource utilization policy specification and analysis framework for (1) specifying very diverse kinds of resources and their potentially complex resource utilization policies, (2) dynamically evaluating the policies’ effects on the outcomes achieved by systems utilizing the resources, and (3) formally verifying various kinds of properties of these systems. Resource utilization policies range from simple, e.g., first-in-first-out, to extremely complex, responding to changes in system environment, state, and stimuli. Further, policies may at times conflict with each other, requiring conflict resolution strategies that add extra complexity. Prior specification approaches rely on relatively simple resource models that prevent the specification of complex utilization and conflict resolution policies. My approach (1) separates resource utilization policy concerns from resource characteristic and request specifications, (2) creates an expressive specification notation for constraint policies, and (3) creates a resource constraint conflict resolution capability. My approach enables creating specifications of policies that are sufficiently precise and detailed to support static and dynamic analyses of how these policies affect the properties of systems constrained or governed by these policies. I provide a process- and resource-aware discrete-event simulator for simulating system executions that adhere to policies of resource utilization. The simulator integrates the existing JSim simulation engine with a separate resource management system. The separate architectural component makes it easy to keep track of resource utilization traces during a simulation run. My simulation framework facilitates considerable flexibility in the evaluation of diverse resource management decisions and powerful dynamic analyses. Dynamic verification through simulation is inherently limited because of the impossibility of exhaustive simulation of all scenarios. I complement this approach with static verification. Prior static resource analysis has supported the verification only of relatively simple resource utilization policies. My research utilizes powerful model checking techniques, building on the existing FLAVERS model checking tool, to verify properties of complex systems that are also verified to conform to complex resource utilization policies. My research demonstrates how to use systems such as FLAVERS to verify adherence to complex resource utilization policies as well as overall system properties, such as the absence of resource leak and resource deadlock. I evaluated my approach working with a hospital emergency department domain expert, using detailed, expert-developed models of the processes and resource utilization policies of an emergency department. In doing this, my research demonstrates how my framework can be effective in guiding the domain expert towards making sound decisions about policies for the management of hospital resources, while also providing rigorously-based assurances that the guidance is reliable and well-founded. My research makes the following contributions: (1) a specification language for resources and resource utilization policies for human-intensive systems, (2) a process- and resource-aware discrete-event simulation engine that creates simulations that adhere to the resource utilization policies, allowing for the dynamic evaluation of resource utilization policies, (3) a process- and resource-aware model checking technique that formally verifies system properties and adherence to resource utilization policies, and (4) validated and verified specifications of an emergency department healthcare system, demonstrating the utility of my approach