12 research outputs found
Absolutely No Free Lunches!
This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite
binary sequences: shown longer and longer initial segments of a binary
sequence, they either attempt to predict whether the next bit will be a 0 or
will be a 1 or they issue forecast probabilities for these events. Several
variants of this problem are considered. In each case, a no-free-lunch result
of the following form is established: the problem of learning is a formidably
difficult one, in that no matter what method is pursued, failure is
incomparably more common that success; and difficult choices must be faced in
choosing a method of learning, since no approach dominates all others in its
range of success. In the simplest case, the comparison of the set of situations
in which a method fails and the set of situations in which it succeeds is a
matter of cardinality (countable vs. uncountable); in other cases, it is a
topological matter (meagre vs. co-meagre) or a hybrid computational-topological
matter (effectively meagre vs. effectively co-meagre)
Absolutely No Free Lunches!
This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite binary sequences: shown longer and longer initial segments of a binary sequence, they either attempt to predict whether the next bit will be a 0 or will be a 1 or they issue forecast probabilities for these events. Several variants of this problem are considered. In each case, a no-free-lunch result of the following form is established: the problem of learning is a formidably difficult one, in that no matter what method is pursued, failure is incomparably more common that success; and difficult choices must be faced in choosing a method of learning, since no approach dominates all others in its range of success. In the simplest case, the comparison of the set of situations in which a method fails and the set of situations in which it succeeds is a matter of cardinality (countable vs. uncountable); in other cases, it is a topological matter (meagre vs. co-meagre) or a hybrid computational-topological matter (effectively meagre vs. effectively co-meagre)
Unprincipled
It is widely thought that chance should be understood in reductionist terms: claims about chance should be understood as claims that certain patterns of events are instantiated. There are many possible reductionist theories of chance, differing as to which possible pattern of events they take to be chance-making. It is also widely taken to be a norm of rationality that credence should defer to chance: special cases aside, rationality requires that one's credence function, when conditionalized on the chance-making facts, should coincide with the objective chance function. It is a shortcoming of a theory of chance if implies that this norm of rationality is unsatisfiable. The primary goal of this paper is to show, on the basis of considerations concerning computability and inductive learning, that this shortcoming is more common than one would have hoped