On the Use of Parsing for Named Entity Recognition

[Abstract] Parsing is a core natural language processing technique that can be used to obtain the structure underlying sentences in human languages. Named entity recognition (NER) is the task of identifying the entities that appear in a text. NER is a challenging natural language processing task that is essential to extract knowledge from texts in multiple domains, ranging from financial to medical. It is intuitive that the structure of a text can be helpful to determine whether or not a certain portion of it is an entity and if so, to establish its concrete limits. However, parsing has been a relatively little-used technique in NER systems, since most of them have chosen to consider shallow approaches to deal with text. In this work, we study the characteristics of NER, a task that is far from being solved despite its long history; we analyze the latest advances in parsing that make its use advisable in NER settings; we review the different approaches to NER that make use of syntactic information; and we propose a new way of using parsing in NER based on casting parsing itself as a sequence labeling task.Xunta de Galicia; ED431C 2020/11Xunta de Galicia; ED431G 2019/01This work has been funded by MINECO, AEI and FEDER of UE through the ANSWER-ASAP project (TIN2017-85160-C2-1-R); and by Xunta de Galicia through a Competitive Reference Group grant (ED431C 2020/11). CITIC, as Research Center of the Galician University System, is funded by the Consellería de Educación, Universidade e Formación Profesional of the Xunta de Galicia through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER) with 80%, the Galicia ERDF 2014-20 Operational Programme, and the remaining 20% from the Secretaría Xeral de Universidades (Ref. ED431G 2019/01). Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC), under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (FASTPARSE, Grant No. 714150)

Faithful Explanations of Black-box NLP Models Using LLM-generated Counterfactuals

Causal explanations of the predictions of NLP systems are essential to ensure safety and establish trust. Yet, existing methods often fall short of explaining model predictions effectively or efficiently and are often model-specific. In this paper, we address model-agnostic explanations, proposing two approaches for counterfactual (CF) approximation. The first approach is CF generation, where a large language model (LLM) is prompted to change a specific text concept while keeping confounding concepts unchanged. While this approach is demonstrated to be very effective, applying LLM at inference-time is costly. We hence present a second approach based on matching, and propose a method that is guided by an LLM at training-time and learns a dedicated embedding space. This space is faithful to a given causal graph and effectively serves to identify matches that approximate CFs. After showing theoretically that approximating CFs is required in order to construct faithful explanations, we benchmark our approaches and explain several models, including LLMs with billions of parameters. Our empirical results demonstrate the excellent performance of CF generation models as model-agnostic explainers. Moreover, our matching approach, which requires far less test-time resources, also provides effective explanations, surpassing many baselines. We also find that Top-K techniques universally improve every tested method. Finally, we showcase the potential of LLMs in constructing new benchmarks for model explanation and subsequently validate our conclusions. Our work illuminates new pathways for efficient and accurate approaches to interpreting NLP systems

Machine learning for managing structured and semi-structured data

As the digitalization of private, commercial, and public sectors advances rapidly, an increasing amount of data is becoming available. In order to gain insights or knowledge from these enormous amounts of raw data, a deep analysis is essential. The immense volume requires highly automated processes with minimal manual interaction. In recent years, machine learning methods have taken on a central role in this task. In addition to the individual data points, their interrelationships often play a decisive role, e.g. whether two patients are related to each other or whether they are treated by the same physician. Hence, relational learning is an important branch of research, which studies how to harness this explicitly available structural information between different data points. Recently, graph neural networks have gained importance. These can be considered an extension of convolutional neural networks from regular grids to general (irregular) graphs. Knowledge graphs play an essential role in representing facts about entities in a machine-readable way. While great efforts are made to store as many facts as possible in these graphs, they often remain incomplete, i.e., true facts are missing. Manual verification and expansion of the graphs is becoming increasingly difficult due to the large volume of data and must therefore be assisted or substituted by automated procedures which predict missing facts. The field of knowledge graph completion can be roughly divided into two categories: Link Prediction and Entity Alignment. In Link Prediction, machine learning models are trained to predict unknown facts between entities based on the known facts. Entity Alignment aims at identifying shared entities between graphs in order to link several such knowledge graphs based on some provided seed alignment pairs. In this thesis, we present important advances in the field of knowledge graph completion. For Entity Alignment, we show how to reduce the number of required seed alignments while maintaining performance by novel active learning techniques. We also discuss the power of textual features and show that graph-neural-network-based methods have difficulties with noisy alignment data. For Link Prediction, we demonstrate how to improve the prediction for unknown entities at training time by exploiting additional metadata on individual statements, often available in modern graphs. Supported with results from a large-scale experimental study, we present an analysis of the effect of individual components of machine learning models, e.g., the interaction function or loss criterion, on the task of link prediction. We also introduce a software library that simplifies the implementation and study of such components and makes them accessible to a wide research community, ranging from relational learning researchers to applied fields, such as life sciences. Finally, we propose a novel metric for evaluating ranking results, as used for both completion tasks. It allows for easier interpretation and comparison, especially in cases with different numbers of ranking candidates, as encountered in the de-facto standard evaluation protocols for both tasks.Mit der rasant fortschreitenden Digitalisierung des privaten, kommerziellen und öffentlichen Sektors werden immer größere Datenmengen verfügbar. Um aus diesen enormen Mengen an Rohdaten Erkenntnisse oder Wissen zu gewinnen, ist eine tiefgehende Analyse unerlässlich. Das immense Volumen erfordert hochautomatisierte Prozesse mit minimaler manueller Interaktion. In den letzten Jahren haben Methoden des maschinellen Lernens eine zentrale Rolle bei dieser Aufgabe eingenommen. Neben den einzelnen Datenpunkten spielen oft auch deren Zusammenhänge eine entscheidende Rolle, z.B. ob zwei Patienten miteinander verwandt sind oder ob sie vom selben Arzt behandelt werden. Daher ist das relationale Lernen ein wichtiger Forschungszweig, der untersucht, wie diese explizit verfügbaren strukturellen Informationen zwischen verschiedenen Datenpunkten nutzbar gemacht werden können. In letzter Zeit haben Graph Neural Networks an Bedeutung gewonnen. Diese können als eine Erweiterung von CNNs von regelmäßigen Gittern auf allgemeine (unregelmäßige) Graphen betrachtet werden. Wissensgraphen spielen eine wesentliche Rolle bei der Darstellung von Fakten über Entitäten in maschinenlesbaren Form. Obwohl große Anstrengungen unternommen werden, so viele Fakten wie möglich in diesen Graphen zu speichern, bleiben sie oft unvollständig, d. h. es fehlen Fakten. Die manuelle Überprüfung und Erweiterung der Graphen wird aufgrund der großen Datenmengen immer schwieriger und muss daher durch automatisierte Verfahren unterstützt oder ersetzt werden, die fehlende Fakten vorhersagen. Das Gebiet der Wissensgraphenvervollständigung lässt sich grob in zwei Kategorien einteilen: Link Prediction und Entity Alignment. Bei der Link Prediction werden maschinelle Lernmodelle trainiert, um unbekannte Fakten zwischen Entitäten auf der Grundlage der bekannten Fakten vorherzusagen. Entity Alignment zielt darauf ab, gemeinsame Entitäten zwischen Graphen zu identifizieren, um mehrere solcher Wissensgraphen auf der Grundlage einiger vorgegebener Paare zu verknüpfen. In dieser Arbeit stellen wir wichtige Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Vervollständigung von Wissensgraphen vor. Für das Entity Alignment zeigen wir, wie die Anzahl der benötigten Paare reduziert werden kann, während die Leistung durch neuartige aktive Lerntechniken erhalten bleibt. Wir erörtern auch die Leistungsfähigkeit von Textmerkmalen und zeigen, dass auf Graph-Neural-Networks basierende Methoden Schwierigkeiten mit verrauschten Paar-Daten haben. Für die Link Prediction demonstrieren wir, wie die Vorhersage für unbekannte Entitäten zur Trainingszeit verbessert werden kann, indem zusätzliche Metadaten zu einzelnen Aussagen genutzt werden, die oft in modernen Graphen verfügbar sind. Gestützt auf Ergebnisse einer groß angelegten experimentellen Studie präsentieren wir eine Analyse der Auswirkungen einzelner Komponenten von Modellen des maschinellen Lernens, z. B. der Interaktionsfunktion oder des Verlustkriteriums, auf die Aufgabe der Link Prediction. Außerdem stellen wir eine Softwarebibliothek vor, die die Implementierung und Untersuchung solcher Komponenten vereinfacht und sie einer breiten Forschungsgemeinschaft zugänglich macht, die von Forschern im Bereich des relationalen Lernens bis hin zu angewandten Bereichen wie den Biowissenschaften reicht. Schließlich schlagen wir eine neuartige Metrik für die Bewertung von Ranking-Ergebnissen vor, wie sie für beide Aufgaben verwendet wird. Sie ermöglicht eine einfachere Interpretation und einen leichteren Vergleich, insbesondere in Fällen mit einer unterschiedlichen Anzahl von Kandidaten, wie sie in den de-facto Standardbewertungsprotokollen für beide Aufgaben vorkommen

Achieving Causal Fairness in Machine Learning

Fairness is a social norm and a legal requirement in today\u27s society. Many laws and regulations (e.g., the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974) have been established to prohibit discrimination and enforce fairness on several grounds, such as gender, age, sexual orientation, race, and religion, referred to as sensitive attributes. Nowadays machine learning algorithms are extensively applied to make important decisions in many real-world applications, e.g., employment, admission, and loans. Traditional machine learning algorithms aim to maximize predictive performance, e.g., accuracy. Consequently, certain groups may get unfairly treated when those algorithms are applied for decision-making. Therefore, it is an imperative task to develop fairness-aware machine learning algorithms such that the decisions made by them are not only accurate but also subject to fairness requirements. In the literature, machine learning researchers have proposed association-based fairness notions, e.g., statistical parity, disparate impact, equality of opportunity, etc., and developed respective discrimination mitigation approaches. However, these works did not consider that fairness should be treated as a causal relationship. Although it is well known that association does not imply causation, the gap between association and causation is not paid sufficient attention by the fairness researchers and stakeholders. The goal of this dissertation is to study fairness in machine learning, define appropriate fairness notions, and develop novel discrimination mitigation approaches from a causal perspective. Based on Pearl\u27s structural causal model, we propose to formulate discrimination as causal effects of the sensitive attribute on the decision. We consider different types of causal effects to cope with different situations, including the path-specific effect for direct/indirect discrimination, the counterfactual effect for group/individual discrimination, and the path-specific counterfactual effect for general cases. In the attempt to measure discrimination, the unidentifiable situations pose an inevitable barrier to the accurate causal inference. To address this challenge, we propose novel bounding methods to accurately estimate the strength of unidentifiable fairness notions, including path-specific fairness, counterfactual fairness, and path-specific counterfactual fairness. Based on the estimation of fairness, we develop novel and efficient algorithms for learning fair classification models. Besides classification, we also investigate the discrimination issues in other machine learning scenarios, such as ranked data analysis

An experimental study of learned cardinality estimation

Cardinality estimation is a fundamental but long unresolved problem in query optimization. Recently, multiple papers from different research groups consistently report that learned models have the potential to replace existing cardinality estimators. In this thesis, we ask a forward-thinking question: Are we ready to deploy these learned cardinality models in production? Our study consists of three main parts. Firstly, we focus on the static environment (i.e., no data updates) and compare five new learned methods with eight traditional methods on four real-world datasets under a unified workload setting. The results show that learned models are indeed more accurate than traditional methods, but they often suffer from high training and inference costs. Secondly, we explore whether these learned models are ready for dynamic environments (i.e., frequent data updates). We find that they can- not catch up with fast data updates and return large errors for different reasons. For less frequent updates, they can perform better but there is no clear winner among themselves. Thirdly, we take a deeper look into learned models and explore when they may go wrong. Our results show that the performance of learned methods can be greatly affected by the changes in correlation, skewness, or domain size. More importantly, their behaviors are much harder to interpret and often unpredictable. Based on these findings, we identify two promising research directions (control the cost of learned models and make learned models trustworthy) and suggest a number of research opportunities. We hope that our study can guide researchers and practitioners to work together to eventually push learned cardinality estimators into real database systems

Entities with quantities : extraction, search, and ranking

Quantities are more than numeric values. They denote measures of the world’s entities such as heights of buildings, running times of athletes, energy efficiency of car models or energy production of power plants, all expressed in numbers with associated units. Entity-centric search and question answering (QA) are well supported by modern search engines. However, they do not work well when the queries involve quantity filters, such as searching for athletes who ran 200m under 20 seconds or companies with quarterly revenue above $2 Billion. State-of-the-art systems fail to understand the quantities, including the condition (less than, above, etc.), the unit of interest (seconds, dollar, etc.), and the context of the quantity (200m race, quarterly revenue, etc.). QA systems based on structured knowledge bases (KBs) also fail as quantities are poorly covered by state-of-the-art KBs. In this dissertation, we developed new methods to advance the state-of-the-art on quantity knowledge extraction and search.Zahlen sind mehr als nur numerische Werte. Sie beschreiben Maße von Entitäten wie die Höhe von Gebäuden, die Laufzeit von Sportlern, die Energieeffizienz von Automodellen oder die Energieerzeugung von Kraftwerken - jeweils ausgedrückt durch Zahlen mit zugehörigen Einheiten. Entitätszentriete Anfragen und direktes Question-Answering werden von Suchmaschinen häufig gut unterstützt. Sie funktionieren jedoch nicht gut, wenn die Fragen Zahlenfilter beinhalten, wie z. B. die Suche nach Sportlern, die 200m unter 20 Sekunden gelaufen sind, oder nach Unternehmen mit einem Quartalsumsatz von über 2 Milliarden US-Dollar. Selbst moderne Systeme schaffen es nicht, Quantitäten, einschließlich der genannten Bedingungen (weniger als, über, etc.), der Maßeinheiten (Sekunden, Dollar, etc.) und des Kontexts (200-Meter-Rennen, Quartalsumsatz usw.), zu verstehen. Auch QA-Systeme, die auf strukturierten Wissensbanken (“Knowledge Bases”, KBs) aufgebaut sind, versagen, da quantitative Eigenschaften von modernen KBs kaum erfasst werden. In dieser Dissertation werden neue Methoden entwickelt, um den Stand der Technik zur Wissensextraktion und -suche von Quantitäten voranzutreiben. Unsere Hauptbeiträge sind die folgenden: • Zunächst präsentieren wir Qsearch [Ho et al., 2019, Ho et al., 2020] – ein System, das mit erweiterten Fragen mit Quantitätsfiltern umgehen kann, indem es Hinweise verwendet, die sowohl in der Frage als auch in den Textquellen vorhanden sind. Qsearch umfasst zwei Hauptbeiträge. Der erste Beitrag ist ein tiefes neuronales Netzwerkmodell, das für die Extraktion quantitätszentrierter Tupel aus Textquellen entwickelt wurde. Der zweite Beitrag ist ein neuartiges Query-Matching-Modell zum Finden und zur Reihung passender Tupel. • Zweitens, um beim Vorgang heterogene Tabellen einzubinden, stellen wir QuTE [Ho et al., 2021a, Ho et al., 2021b] vor – ein System zum Extrahieren von Quantitätsinformationen aus Webquellen, insbesondere Ad-hoc Webtabellen in HTML-Seiten. Der Beitrag von QuTE umfasst eine Methode zur Verknüpfung von Quantitäts- und Entitätsspalten, für die externe Textquellen genutzt werden. Zur Beantwortung von Fragen kontextualisieren wir die extrahierten Entitäts-Quantitäts-Paare mit informativen Hinweisen aus der Tabelle und stellen eine neue Methode zur Konsolidierung und verbesserteer Reihung von Antwortkandidaten durch Inter-Fakten-Konsistenz vor. • Drittens stellen wir QL [Ho et al., 2022] vor – eine Recall-orientierte Methode zur Anreicherung von Knowledge Bases (KBs) mit quantitativen Fakten. Moderne KBs wie Wikidata oder YAGO decken viele Entitäten und ihre relevanten Informationen ab, übersehen aber oft wichtige quantitative Eigenschaften. QL ist frage-gesteuert und basiert auf iterativem Lernen mit zwei Hauptbeiträgen, um die KB-Abdeckung zu verbessern. Der erste Beitrag ist eine Methode zur Expansion von Fragen, um einen größeren Pool an Faktenkandidaten zu erfassen. Der zweite Beitrag ist eine Technik zur Selbstkonsistenz durch Berücksichtigung der Werteverteilungen von Quantitäten