302 research outputs found
Constraints on predicate invention
This chapter describes an inductive learning method that derives logic programs and invents predicates when needed. The basic idea is to form the least common anti-instance (LCA) of selected seed examples. If the LCA is too general it forms the starting poĂnt of a gneral-to-specific search which is guided by various constraints on argument dependencies and critical terms. A distinguishing feature of the method is its ability to introduce new predicates. Predicate invention involves three steps. First, the need for a new predicate is discovered and the arguments of the new predicate are determĂned using the same constraints that guide the search. In the second step, instances of the new predicate are abductively inferred. These instances form the input for the last step where the definition of the new predicate is induced by recursively applying the method again. We also outline how such a system could be more tightly integrated with an abductive learning system
Efficient Predicate Invention using Shared NeMuS
Amao is a cognitive agent framework that tacklesthe invention of predicates with a different strat-egy as compared to recent advances in InductiveLogic Programming (ILP) approaches like Meta-Intepretive Learning (MIL) technique. It uses aNeural Multi-Space (NeMuS) graph structure toanti-unify atoms from the Herbrand base, whichpasses in the inductive momentum check. Induc-tive Clause Learning (ICL), as it is called, is ex-tended here by using the weights of logical compo-nents, already present in NeMuS, to support induc-tive learning by expanding clause candidates withanti-unified atoms. An efficient invention mecha-nism is achieved, including the learning of recur-sive hypotheses, while restricting the shape of thehypothesis by adding bias definitions or idiosyn-crasies of the language
Predicate Invention in Inductive Logic Programming
The ability to recognise new concepts and incorporate them into our knowledge is an essential part of learning. From new scientific concepts to the words that are used in everyday conversation, they all must have at some point in the past, been invented and their definition defined. In this position paper, we discuss how a general framework for predicate invention could be made, by reasoning about the problem at the meta-level using an appropriate notion of top theory in inductive logic programming
Generalisation Through Negation and Predicate Invention
The ability to generalise from a small number of examples is a fundamental
challenge in machine learning. To tackle this challenge, we introduce an
inductive logic programming (ILP) approach that combines negation and predicate
invention. Combining these two features allows an ILP system to generalise
better by learning rules with universally quantified body-only variables. We
implement our idea in NOPI, which can learn normal logic programs with
predicate invention, including Datalog programs with stratified negation. Our
experimental results on multiple domains show that our approach can improve
predictive accuracies and learning times.Comment: Under peer-revie
Meta-interpretive learning of higher-order dyadic datalog: predicate invention revisited
Since the late 1990s predicate invention has been under-explored within inductive logic programming due to difficulties in formulating efficient search mechanisms. However, a recent paper demonstrated that both predicate invention and the learning of recursion can be efficiently implemented for regular and context-free grammars, by way of metalogical substitutions with respect to a modified Prolog meta-interpreter which acts as the learning engine. New predicate symbols are introduced as constants representing existentially quantified higher-order variables. The approach demonstrates that predicate invention can be treated as a form of higher-order logical reasoning. In this paper we generalise the approach of meta-interpretive learning (MIL) to that of learning higher-order dyadic datalog programs. We show that with an infinite signature the higher-order dyadic datalog class H2 2 has universal Turing expressivity though H2 2 is decidable given a finite signature. Additionally we show that Knuth–Bendix ordering of the hypothesis space together with logarithmic clause bounding allows our MIL implementation MetagolD to PAC-learn minimal cardinality H2 2 definitions. This result is consistent with our experiments which indicate that MetagolD efficiently learns compact H2 2 definitions involving predicate invention for learning robotic strategies, the East–West train challenge and NELL. Additionally higher-order concepts were learned in the NELL language learning domain. The Metagol code and datasets described in this paper have been made publicly available on a website to allow reproduction of results in this paper
Recommended from our members
How does predicate invention affect human comprehensibility?
During the 1980s Michie defined Machine Learning in terms of two orthogonal axes of performance: predictive accuracy and comprehensibility of generated hypotheses. Since predictive accuracy was readily measurable and comprehensibility not so, later definitions in the 1990s, such as that of Mitchell, tended to use a one-dimensional approach to Machine Learning based solely on predictive accuracy, ultimately favouring statistical over symbolic Machine Learning approaches. In this paper we provide a definition of comprehensibility of hypotheses which can be estimated using human participant trials. We present the results of experiments testing human comprehensibility of logic programs learned with and without predicate invention. Results indicate that comprehensibility is affected not only by the complexity of the presented program but also by the existence of anonymous predicate symbols
Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming in High-Dimensional Space
Synthesizing large logic programs through symbolic Inductive Logic
Programming (ILP) typically requires intermediate definitions. However,
cluttering the hypothesis space with intensional predicates typically degrades
performance. In contrast, gradient descent provides an efficient way to find
solutions within such high-dimensional spaces. Neuro-symbolic ILP approaches
have not fully exploited this so far. We propose extending the {\delta}ILP
approach to inductive synthesis with large-scale predicate invention, thus
allowing us to exploit the efficacy of high-dimensional gradient descent. We
show that large-scale predicate invention benefits differentiable inductive
synthesis through gradient descent and allows one to learn solutions for tasks
beyond the capabilities of existing neuro-symbolic ILP systems. Furthermore, we
achieve these results without specifying the precise structure of the solution
within the language bias.Comment: 8 pages, under revie
- …