20 research outputs found

    Vertex Disjoint Path in Upward Planar Graphs

    Full text link
    The kk-vertex disjoint paths problem is one of the most studied problems in algorithmic graph theory. In 1994, Schrijver proved that the problem can be solved in polynomial time for every fixed kk when restricted to the class of planar digraphs and it was a long standing open question whether it is fixed-parameter tractable (with respect to parameter kk) on this restricted class. Only recently, \cite{CMPP}.\ achieved a major breakthrough and answered the question positively. Despite the importance of this result (and the brilliance of their proof), it is of rather theoretical importance. Their proof technique is both technically extremely involved and also has at least double exponential parameter dependence. Thus, it seems unrealistic that the algorithm could actually be implemented. In this paper, therefore, we study a smaller class of planar digraphs, the class of upward planar digraphs, a well studied class of planar graphs which can be drawn in a plane such that all edges are drawn upwards. We show that on the class of upward planar digraphs the problem (i) remains NP-complete and (ii) the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. While membership in FPT follows immediately from \cite{CMPP}'s general result, our algorithm has only single exponential parameter dependency compared to the double exponential parameter dependence for general planar digraphs. Furthermore, our algorithm can easily be implemented, in contrast to the algorithm in \cite{CMPP}.Comment: 14 page

    Walking Through Waypoints

    Full text link
    We initiate the study of a fundamental combinatorial problem: Given a capacitated graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), find a shortest walk ("route") from a source sVs\in V to a destination tVt\in V that includes all vertices specified by a set WV\mathscr{W}\subseteq V: the \emph{waypoints}. This waypoint routing problem finds immediate applications in the context of modern networked distributed systems. Our main contribution is an exact polynomial-time algorithm for graphs of bounded treewidth. We also show that if the number of waypoints is logarithmically bounded, exact polynomial-time algorithms exist even for general graphs. Our two algorithms provide an almost complete characterization of what can be solved exactly in polynomial-time: we show that more general problems (e.g., on grid graphs of maximum degree 3, with slightly more waypoints) are computationally intractable

    Finding k partially disjoint paths in a directed planar graph

    Get PDF
    The {\it partially disjoint paths problem} is: {\it given:} a directed graph, vertices r1,s1,,rk,skr_1,s_1,\ldots,r_k,s_k, and a set FF of pairs {i,j}\{i,j\} from {1,,k}\{1,\ldots,k\}, {\it find:} for each i=1,,ki=1,\ldots,k a directed risir_i-s_i path PiP_i such that if {i,j}F\{i,j\}\in F then PiP_i and PjP_j are disjoint. We show that for fixed kk, this problem is solvable in polynomial time if the directed graph is planar. More generally, the problem is solvable in polynomial time for directed graphs embedded on a fixed compact surface. Moreover, one may specify for each edge a subset of {1,,k}\{1,\ldots,k\} prescribing which of the risir_i-s_i paths are allowed to traverse this edge

    Irrelevant vertices for the planar Disjoint Paths Problem

    Get PDF
    The Disjoint Paths Problem asks, given a graph G and a set of pairs of terminals (s1,t1),…,(sk,tk)(s1,t1),…,(sk,tk), whether there is a collection of k pairwise vertex-disjoint paths linking sisi and titi, for i=1,…,ki=1,…,k. In their f(k)⋅n3f(k)⋅n3 algorithm for this problem, Robertson and Seymour introduced the irrelevant vertex technique according to which in every instance of treewidth greater than g(k)g(k) there is an “irrelevant” vertex whose removal creates an equivalent instance of the problem. This fact is based on the celebrated Unique Linkage Theorem , whose – very technical – proof gives a function g(k)g(k) that is responsible for an immense parameter dependence in the running time of the algorithm. In this paper we give a new and self-contained proof of this result that strongly exploits the combinatorial properties of planar graphs and achieves g(k)=O(k3/2⋅2k)g(k)=O(k3/2⋅2k). Our bound is radically better than the bounds known for general graphs
    corecore