Aggregating fuzzy subgroups and T-vague groups

Fuzzy subgroups and T-vague groups are interesting fuzzy algebraic structures that have been widely studied. While fuzzy subgroups fuzzify the concept of crisp subgroup, T-vague groups can be identified with quotient groups of a group by a normal fuzzy subgroup and there is a close relation between both structures and T-indistinguishability operators (fuzzy equivalence relations). In this paper the functions that aggregate fuzzy subgroups and T-vague groups will be studied. The functions aggregating T-indistinguishability operators have been characterized [9] and the main result of this paper is that the functions aggregating T-indistinguishability operators coincide with the ones that aggregate fuzzy subgroups and T-vague groups. In particular, quasi-arithmetic means and some OWA operators aggregate them if the t-norm is continuous Archimedean.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

On the relationship between fuzzy subgroups and indistinguishability operators

Fuzzy subgroups are revisited considering their close relationship with indistinguishability operators (fuzzy equivalences) invariant under translations. Different ways to obtain new fuzzy subgroups from a given one are provided and different ways to characterize normal fuzzy subgroups are obtained. The idea of double coset of two (crisp) subgroups allow us to relate them via their equivalence classes. This is generalized to the fuzzy framework. The conditions in which a fuzzy relation R on a group G can be considered a fuzzy subgroup of G × G are obtained.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Some illustrative examples of permutability of fuzzy operators and fuzzy relations

Composition of fuzzy operators often appears and it is natural to ask when the order of composition does not change the result. In previous papers, we characterized permutability in the case of fuzzy consequence operators and fuzzy interior operators. We also showed the connection between the permutability of the fuzzy relations and the permutability of their induced fuzzy operators. In this work we present some examples of permutability and non permutability of fuzzy operators and fuzzy relations in order to illustrate these results.Postprint (published version

Fifty years of similarity relations: a survey of foundations and applications

On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the publication of Zadeh's significant paper Similarity Relations and Fuzzy Orderings, an account of the development of similarity relations during this time will be given. Moreover, the main topics related to these fuzzy relations will be reviewed.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Some illustrative examples of permutability of fuzzy operators and fuzzy relations

Composition of fuzzy operators often appears and it is natural to ask when the order of composition does not change the result. In previous papers, we characterized permutability in the case of fuzzy consequence operators and fuzzy interior operators. We also showed the connection between the permutability of the fuzzy relations and the permutability of their induced fuzzy operators. In this work we present some examples of permutability and non permutability of fuzzy operators and fuzzy relations in order to illustrate these results

Permutable indistinguishability operators, perfect vague groups and fuzzy subgroups

Permutability between T-indistinguishability operators is a very interesting property that is related to the compatibility of the operators with algebraic structures. It will be shown that the sup −T product E ∘ F of two T-indistinguishability operators is also a T-indistinguishability operator if and only if E and F are permutable T-indistinguishability operators (i.e., E ∘ F = F ∘ E). This property will be related to the study of fuzzy subgroups, fuzzy normal subgroups and vague groups. The aggregation of fuzzy subgroups will also be analyzed.Peer Reviewe