A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids

[EN] Peer-to-Peer (P2P) overlay communications networks have emerged as a new paradigm for implementing distributed services in microgrids due to their potential benefits: they are robust, scalable, fault-tolerant, and they can route messages even with a large number of nodes which are frequently entering or leaving from the network. However, current P2P systems have been mainly developed for file sharing or cycle sharing applications where the processes of searching and managing resources are not optimized. Locality algorithms have gained a lot of attention due to their potential to provide an optimized path to groups with similar interests for routing messages in order to get better network performance. This paper develops a fully functional decentralized communication architecture with a new P2P locality algorithm and a specific protocol for monitoring and control of microgrids. Experimental results show that the proposed locality algorithm reduces the number of lookup messages and the lookup delay time. Moreover, the proposed communication architecture heavily depends of the lookup used algorithm as well as the placement of the communication layers within the architecture. Experimental results will show that the proposed techniques meet the network requirements of smart microgrids even with a large number of nodes on stream.This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Grant ENE2015-64087-C2-2R. This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under BES-2013-064539.Marzal-Romeu, S.; González-Medina, R.; Salas-Puente, RA.; Figueres Amorós, E.; Garcerá, G. (2017). A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids. Energies. 10(9):1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091275S125109Khan, R. H., & Khan, J. Y. (2013). A comprehensive review of the application characteristics and traffic requirements of a smart grid communications network. Computer Networks, 57(3), 825-845. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.11.002Dada, J. O. (2014). Towards understanding the benefits and challenges of Smart/Micro-Grid for electricity supply system in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1003-1014. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.077Lidula, N. W. A., & Rajapakse, A. D. (2011). Microgrids research: A review of experimental microgrids and test systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 186-202. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.041Hussain, A., Arif, S. M., Aslam, M., & Shah, S. D. A. (2017). Optimal siting and sizing of tri-generation equipment for developing an autonomous community microgrid considering uncertainties. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 318-330. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.004Dehghanpour, K., Colson, C., & Nehrir, H. (2017). A Survey on Smart Agent-Based Microgrids for Resilient/Self-Healing Grids. Energies, 10(5), 620. doi:10.3390/en10050620Palizban, O., Kauhaniemi, K., & Guerrero, J. M. (2014). Microgrids in active network management – part II: System operation, power quality and protection. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 440-451. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.048Shi, W., Li, N., Chu, C.-C., & Gadh, R. (2017). Real-Time Energy Management in Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(1), 228-238. doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2462294Deng, R., Yang, Z., Chow, M.-Y., & Chen, J. (2015). A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3), 570-582. doi:10.1109/tii.2015.2414719Moazami Goodarzi, H., & Kazemi, M. (2017). A Novel Optimal Control Method for Islanded Microgrids Based on Droop Control Using the ICA-GA Algorithm. Energies, 10(4), 485. doi:10.3390/en10040485Erol-Kantarci, M., Kantarci, B., & Mouftah, H. (2011). Reliable overlay topology design for the smart microgrid network. IEEE Network, 25(5), 38-43. doi:10.1109/mnet.2011.6033034Hassan Youssef, K. (2016). Optimal management of unbalanced smart microgrids for scheduled and unscheduled multiple transitions between grid-connected and islanded modes. Electric Power Systems Research, 141, 104-113. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2016.07.015Giotitsas, C., Pazaitis, A., & Kostakis, V. (2015). A peer-to-peer approach to energy production. Technology in Society, 42, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.02.002Kazmi, S. A. A., Shahzad, M. K., Khan, A. Z., & Shin, D. R. (2017). Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective. Energies, 10(4), 501. doi:10.3390/en10040501Werth, A., Andre, A., Kawamoto, D., Morita, T., Tajima, S., Tokoro, M., … Tanaka, K. (2018). Peer-to-Peer Control System for DC Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4), 3667-3675. doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2638462Deconinck, G., Vanthournout, K., Beitollahi, H., Qui, Z., Duan, R., Nauwelaers, B., … Belmans, R. (2008). A Robust Semantic Overlay Network for Microgrid Control Applications. Architecting Dependable Systems V, 101-123. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85571-2_5Bandara, H. M. N. D., & Jayasumana, A. P. (2012). Collaborative applications over peer-to-peer systems–challenges and solutions. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 6(3), 257-276. doi:10.1007/s12083-012-0157-3Palizban, O., & Kauhaniemi, K. (2015). Hierarchical control structure in microgrids with distributed generation: Island and grid-connected mode. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 797-813. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.008Khatibzadeh, A., Besmi, M., Mahabadi, A., & Reza Haghifam, M. (2017). Multi-Agent-Based Controller for Voltage Enhancement in AC/DC Hybrid Microgrid Using Energy Storages. Energies, 10(2), 169. doi:10.3390/en10020169Planas, E., Gil-de-Muro, A., Andreu, J., Kortabarria, I., & Martínez de Alegría, I. (2013). General aspects, hierarchical controls and droop methods in microgrids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, 147-159. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.032Olivares, D. E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A. H., Canizares, C. A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., … Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2014). Trends in Microgrid Control. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(4), 1905-1919. doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514Vandoorn, T. L., Vasquez, J. C., De Kooning, J., Guerrero, J. M., & Vandevelde, L. (2013). Microgrids: Hierarchical Control and an Overview of the Control and Reserve Management Strategies. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 7(4), 42-55. doi:10.1109/mie.2013.2279306Zhou, B., Li, W., Chan, K. W., Cao, Y., Kuang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61, 30-40. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.047Ancillotti, E., Bruno, R., & Conti, M. (2013). The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges. Computer Communications, 36(17-18), 1665-1697. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2013.09.004Llaria, A., Terrasson, G., Curea, O., & Jiménez, J. (2016). Application of Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks to Achieve Intelligent Microgrids: A Promising Approach towards a Global Smart Grid Deployment. Applied Sciences, 6(3), 61. doi:10.3390/app6030061Luna, A. C., Diaz, N. L., Graells, M., Vasquez, J. C., & Guerrero, J. M. (2016). Cooperative energy management for a cluster of households prosumers. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 62(3), 235-242. doi:10.1109/tce.2016.7613189Gungor, V. C., Lu, B., & Hancke, G. P. (2010). Opportunities and Challenges of Wireless Sensor Networks in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 3557-3564. doi:10.1109/tie.2009.2039455Zhao, C., He, J., Cheng, P., & Chen, J. (2017). Consensus-Based Energy Management in Smart Grid With Transmission Losses and Directed Communication. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(5), 2049-2061. doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2513772Lo, C.-H., & Ansari, N. (2013). Decentralized Controls and Communications for Autonomous Distribution Networks in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(1), 66-77. doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2228282Li, C., Savaghebi, M., Guerrero, J., Coelho, E., & Vasquez, J. (2016). Operation Cost Minimization of Droop-Controlled AC Microgrids Using Multiagent-Based Distributed Control. Energies, 9(9), 717. doi:10.3390/en9090717Wu, X., Jiang, P., & Lu, J. (2014). Multiagent-Based Distributed Load Shedding for Islanded Microgrids. Energies, 7(9), 6050-6062. doi:10.3390/en7096050Kantamneni, A., Brown, L. E., Parker, G., & Weaver, W. W. (2015). Survey of multi-agent systems for microgrid control. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 45, 192-203. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.07.005Lopes, A. L., & Botelho, L. M. (2008). Improving Multi-Agent Based Resource Coordination in Peer-to-Peer Networks. Journal of Networks, 3(2). doi:10.4304/jnw.3.2.38-47Cameron, A., Stumptner, M., Nandagopal, N., Mayer, W., & Mansell, T. (2015). Rule-based peer-to-peer framework for decentralised real-time service oriented architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 97, 202-234. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.06.005Zhang, C., Wu, J., Cheng, M., Zhou, Y., & Long, C. (2016). A Bidding System for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in a Grid-connected Microgrid. Energy Procedia, 103, 147-152. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.264Malatras, A. (2015). State-of-the-art survey on P2P overlay networks in pervasive computing environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 55, 1-23. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.04.014Eng Keong Lua, Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., & Lim, S. (2005). A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 7(2), 72-93. doi:10.1109/comst.2005.1610546Xu, J., Kumar, A., & Yu, X. (2004). On the Fundamental Tradeoffs Between Routing Table Size and Network Diameter in Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(1), 151-163. doi:10.1109/jsac.2003.818805Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001). Chord. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(4), 149-160. doi:10.1145/964723.383071Rowstron, A., & Druschel, P. (2001). Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 329-350. doi:10.1007/3-540-45518-3_18Yuh-Jzer Joung, Li-Wei Yang, & Chien-Tse Fang. (2007). Keyword search in DHT-based peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(1), 46-61. doi:10.1109/jsac.2007.070106Stoica, I., Morris, R., Liben-Nowell, D., Karger, D. R., Kaashoek, M. F., Dabek, F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2003). Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup protocol for internet applications. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(1), 17-32. doi:10.1109/tnet.2002.808407Gottron, C., König, A., & Steinmetz, R. (2010). A Survey on Security in Mobile Peer-to-Peer Architectures—Overlay-Based vs. Underlay-Based Approaches. Future Internet, 2(4), 505-532. doi:10.3390/fi2040505Seyedi, Y., Karimi, H., & Guerrero, J. M. (2017). Centralized Disturbance Detection in Smart Microgrids With Noisy and Intermittent Synchrophasor Data. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(6), 2775-2783. doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2539947Youssef, T., Elsayed, A., & Mohammed, O. (2016). Data Distribution Service-Based Interoperability Framework for Smart Grid Testbed Infrastructure. Energies, 9(3), 150. doi:10.3390/en9030150Liu, X., Xia, H., & Chien, A. A. (2004). Validating and Scaling the MicroGrid: A Scientific Instrument for Grid Dynamics. Journal of Grid Computing, 2(2), 141-161. doi:10.1007/s10723-004-4200-3Kansal, P., & Bose, A. (2012). Bandwidth and Latency Requirements for Smart Transmission Grid Applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3), 1344-1352. doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2197229Kuo, M.-T., & Lu, S.-D. (2013). Design and Implementation of Real-Time Intelligent Control and Structure Based on Multi-Agent Systems in Microgrids. Energies, 6(11), 6045-6059. doi:10.3390/en6116045Del Val, E., Rebollo, M., & Botti, V. (2012). Enhancing decentralized service discovery in open service-oriented multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 28(1), 1-30. doi:10.1007/s10458-012-9210-0Howell, S., Rezgui, Y., Hippolyte, J.-L., Jayan, B., & Li, H. (2017). Towards the next generation of smart grids: Semantic and holonic multi-agent management of distributed energy resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 193-214. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.107Frey, S., Diaconescu, A., Menga, D., & Demeure, I. (2015). A Generic Holonic Control Architecture for Heterogeneous Multiscale and Multiobjective Smart Microgrids. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 10(2), 1-21. doi:10.1145/2700326Miers, C., Simplicio, M., Gallo, D., Carvalho, T., Bressan, G., Souza, V., … Damola, A. (2010). A Taxonomy for Locality Algorithms on Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 8(4), 323-331. doi:10.1109/tla.2010.5595121Porsinger, T., Janik, P., Leonowicz, Z., & Gono, R. (2017). Modelling and Optimization in Microgrids. Energies, 10(4), 523. doi:10.3390/en10040523Ali, M., Zakariya, M., Asif, M., & Ullah, A. (2012). TCP/IP Based Intelligent Load Management System in Micro-Grids Network Using MATLAB/Simulink. Energy and Power Engineering, 04(04), 283-289. doi:10.4236/epe.2012.44038Shin, I.-J., Song, B.-K., & Eom, D.-S. (2017). International Electronical Committee (IEC) 61850 Mapping with Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) in Smart Grids Based European Telecommunications Standard Institute Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Environment. Energies, 10(3), 393. doi:10.3390/en10030393Loh, P. C., Li, D., Chai, Y. K., & Blaabjerg, F. (2013). Autonomous Operation of Hybrid Microgrid With AC and DC Subgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 28(5), 2214-2223. doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2214792Overlay networks for smart gridshttp://users.atlantis.ugent.be/cdvelder/papers/2013/wauters2013sgv.pdfEugster, P. T., Felber, P. A., Guerraoui, R., & Kermarrec, A.-M. (2003). The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(2), 114-131. doi:10.1145/857076.857078Ali, I. (2012). High-speed Peer-to-peer Communication based Protection Scheme Implementation and Testing in Laboratory. International Journal of Computer Applications, 38(4), 16-24. doi:10.5120/4596-6793Yoo, B.-K., Yang, S.-H., Yang, H.-S., Kim, W.-Y., Jeong, Y.-S., Han, B.-M., & Jang, K.-S. (2011). Communication Architecture of the IEC 61850-based Micro Grid System. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 6(5), 605-612. doi:10.5370/jeet.2011.6.5.605Dou, X., Quan, X., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Yang, K., Yuan, J., & Wang, M. (2014). Hybrid Multi-Agent Control in Microgrids: Framework, Models and Implementations Based on IEC 61850. Energies, 8(1), 31-58. doi:10.3390/en801003

Optimal Economic Schedule for a Network of Microgrids With Hybrid Energy Storage System Using Distributed Model Predictive Control

Artículo Open Access en el sitio web el editor. Pago por publicar en abierto.In this paper, an optimal procedure for the economic schedule of a network of interconnected microgrids with hybrid energy storage system is carried out through a control algorithm based on distributed model predictive control (DMPC). The algorithm is specifically designed according to the criterion of improving the cost function of each microgrid acting as a single system through the network mode operation. The algorithm allows maximum economical benefit of the microgrids, minimizing the degradation causes of each storage system, and fulfilling the different system constraints. In order to capture both continuous/discrete dynamics and switching between different operating conditions, the plant is modeled with the framework of mixed logic dynamic. The DMPC problem is solved with the use of mixed integer linear programming using a piecewise formulation, in order to linearize a mixed integer quadratic programming problem.Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitivadad DPI2016-78338-RComisión Europea 0076-AGERAR-6-

Demand and Storage Management in a Prosumer Nanogrid Based on Energy Forecasting

Energy efficiency and consumers' role in the energy system are among the strategic research topics in power systems these days. Smart grids (SG) and, specifically, microgrids, are key tools for these purposes. This paper presents a three-stage strategy for energy management in a prosumer nanogrid. Firstly, energy monitoring is performed and time-space compression is applied as a tool for forecasting energy resources and power quality (PQ) indices; secondly, demand is managed, taking advantage of smart appliances (SA) to reduce the electricity bill; finally, energy storage systems (ESS) are also managed to better match the forecasted generation of each prosumer. Results show how these strategies can be coordinated to contribute to energy management in the prosumer nanogrid. A simulation test is included, which proves how effectively the prosumers' power converters track the power setpoints obtained from the proposed strategy.Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion ; Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional

A nearly zero-energy microgrid testbed laboratory: Centralized control strategy based on SCADA system

Currently, despite the use of renewable energy sources (RESs), distribution networks are facing problems, such as complexity and low productivity. Emerging microgrids (MGs) with RESs based on supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) are an effective solution to control, manage, and finally deal with these challenges. The development and success of MGs is highly dependent on the use of power electronic interfaces. The use of these interfaces is directly related to the progress of SCADA systems and communication infrastructures. The use of SCADA systems for the control and operation of MGs and active distribution networks promotes productivity and efficiency. This paper presents a real MG case study called the LAMBDA MG testbed laboratory, which has been implemented in the electrical department of the Sapienza University of Rome with a centralized energy management system (CEMS). The real-time results of the SCADA system show that a CEMS can create proper energy balance in a LAMBDA MG testbed and, consequently, minimize the exchange power of the LAMBDA MG and main grid

Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review

The advent of more proactive consumers, the so-called "prosumers", with production and storage capabilities, is empowering the consumers and bringing new opportunities and challenges to the operation of power systems in a market environment. Recently, a novel proposal for the design and operation of electricity markets has emerged: these so-called peer-to-peer (P2P) electricity markets conceptually allow the prosumers to directly share their electrical energy and investment. Such P2P markets rely on a consumer-centric and bottom-up perspective by giving the opportunity to consumers to freely choose the way they are to source their electric energy. A community can also be formed by prosumers who want to collaborate, or in terms of operational energy management. This paper contributes with an overview of these new P2P markets that starts with the motivation, challenges, market designs moving to the potential future developments in this field, providing recommendations while considering a test-case

Hydrogen vs. Battery in the long-term operation. A comparative between energy management strategies for hybrid renewable microgrids

The growth of the world’s energy demand over recent decades in relation to energy intensity and demography is clear. At the same time, the use of renewable energy sources is pursued to address decarbonization targets, but the stochasticity of renewable energy systems produces an increasing need for management systems to supply such energy volume while guaranteeing, at the same time, the security and reliability of the microgrids. Locally distributed energy storage systems (ESS) may provide the capacity to temporarily decouple production and demand. In this sense, the most implemented ESS in local energy districts are small–medium-scale electrochemical batteries. However, hydrogen systems are viable for storing larger energy quantities thanks to its intrinsic high mass-energy density. To match generation, demand and storage, energy management systems (EMSs) become crucial. This paper compares two strategies for an energy management system based on hydrogen-priority vs. battery-priority for the operation of a hybrid renewable microgrid. The overall performance of the two mentioned strategies is compared in the long-term operation via a set of evaluation parameters defined by the unmet load, storage efficiency, operating hours and cumulative energy. The results show that the hydrogen-priority strategy allows the microgrid to be led towards island operation because it saves a higher amount of energy, while the battery-priority strategy reduces the energy efficiency in the storage round trip. The main contribution of this work lies in the demonstration that conventional EMS for microgrids’ operation based on battery-priority strategy should turn into hydrogen-priority to keep the reliability and independence of the microgrid in the long-term operation