Parameterized Constraint Satisfaction Problems: a Survey

We consider constraint satisfaction problems parameterized above or below guaranteed values. One example is MaxSat parameterized above m/2: given a CNF formula F with m clauses, decide whether there is a truth assignment that satisfies at least m/2 + k clauses, where k is the parameter. Among other problems we deal with are MaxLin2-AA (given a system of linear equations over F_2 in which each equation has a positive integral weight, decide whether there is an assignment to the variables that satisfies equations of total weight at least W/2+k, where W is the total weight of all equations), Max-r-Lin2-AA (the same as MaxLin2-AA, but each equation has at most r variables, where r is a constant) and Max-r-Sat-AA (given a CNF formula F with m clauses in which each clause has at most r literals, decide whether there is a truth assignment satisfying at least sum_{i=1}^m (1-2^{r_i})+k clauses, where k is the parameter, r_i is the number of literals in clause i, and r is a constant). We also consider Max-r-CSP-AA, a natural generalization of both Max-r-Lin2-AA and Max-r-Sat-AA, order (or, permutation) constraint satisfaction problems parameterized above the average value and some other problems related to MaxSat. We discuss results, both polynomial kernels and parameterized algorithms, obtained for the problems mainly in the last few years as well as some open questions

Satisfying More Than Half of a System of Linear Equations Over GF(2): A Multivariate Approach

In the parameterized problem MaxLin2-AA[k ], we are given a system with variables x1,…,xnx1,…,xn consisting of equations of the form ∏i∈Ixi=b∏i∈Ixi=b, where xi,b∈{−1,1}xi,b∈{−1,1} and I⊆[n]I⊆[n], each equation has a positive integral weight, and we are to decide whether it is possible to simultaneously satisfy equations of total weight at least W/2+kW/2+k, where W is the total weight of all equations and k is the parameter (it is always possible for k=0k=0). We show that MaxLin2-AA[k ] has a kernel with at most View the MathML sourceO(k2logk) variables and can be solved in time 2O(klogk)(nm)O(1)2O(klogk)(nm)O(1). This solves an open problem of Mahajan et al. (2006). The problem Max-r-Lin2-AA[k,rk,r] is the same as MaxLin2-AA[k] with two differences: each equation has at most r variables and r is the second parameter. We prove that Max-r-Lin2-AA[k,rk,r] has a kernel with at most (2k−1)r(2k−1)r variables

A New Lower Bound on the Maximum Number of Satisfied Clauses in Max-SAT and its Algorithmic Applications

A pair of unit clauses is called conflicting if it is of the form $(x)$, $(\bar{x})$. A CNF formula is unit-conflict free (UCF) if it contains no pair of conflicting unit clauses. Lieberherr and Specker (J. ACM 28, 1981) showed that for each UCF CNF formula with $m$ clauses we can simultaneously satisfy at least \pp m clauses, where \pp =(\sqrt{5}-1)/2. We improve the Lieberherr-Specker bound by showing that for each UCF CNF formula $F$ with $m$ clauses we can find, in polynomial time, a subformula $F'$ with $m'$ clauses such that we can simultaneously satisfy at least \pp m+(1-\pp)m'+(2-3\pp)n"/2 clauses (in $F$), where $n"$ is the number of variables in $F$ which are not in $F'$. We consider two parameterized versions of MAX-SAT, where the parameter is the number of satisfied clauses above the bounds $m/2$ and $m(\sqrt{5}-1)/2$. The former bound is tight for general formulas, and the later is tight for UCF formulas. Mahajan and Raman (J. Algorithms 31, 1999) showed that every instance of the first parameterized problem can be transformed, in polynomial time, into an equivalent one with at most $6k+3$ variables and $10k$ clauses. We improve this to $4k$ variables and $(2\sqrt{5}+4)k$ clauses. Mahajan and Raman conjectured that the second parameterized problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT). We show that the problem is indeed FPT by describing a polynomial-time algorithm that transforms any problem instance into an equivalent one with at most $(7+3\sqrt{5})k$ variables. Our results are obtained using our improvement of the Lieberherr-Specker bound above

Railway Timetable Optimization

In this cumulative dissertation, we study several aspects of railway timetable optimization. The first contributions cover Practical Applications of Automatic Railway Timetabling. In particular, for the problem of simultaneously scheduling all freight trains in Germany such that there are no conflicts between them, we propose a novel column generation approach. Each train can choose from an iteratively growing set of possible routes and times, so called slots. For the task of choosing maximally many slots without conflicts, we present and apply the heuristic algorithm Conflict Resolving (CR). With these two methods, we are able to schedule more than 5000 trains simultaneously, exceeding the scopes of other studies. A second practical application that we study is measuring the capacity increase in the railway network when equipping freight trains with electro-pneumatic brakes and middle buffer couplings. Methodically, we propose to explicitly construct as many slots as possible for such trains and measure the capacity as the number of constructed slots. Furthermore, we contribute to the field of Algorithms and Computability in Timetable Generation. We present two heuristic solution algorithms for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem (MaxSAT). In the literature, it has been proposed to encode different NP-complete problems that occur in railway timetabling in MaxSAT. In numerical experiments, we prove that our algorithms are competitive to state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers. Moreover, we study the parameterized complexity status of periodic scheduling and give proofs that the problem is NP-complete for input graphs of bounded treewidth, branchwidth and carvingwidth. Finally, we propose a framework for analyzing Delay Propagation in Railway Networks. More precisely, we develop delay transmission rules based on different correlation measures that can be derived from historical operations data. What is more, we apply SHAP values from Explainable AI to the problem of discerning primary delays that occur stochastically in the operations, to secondary follow-up delays. Transmission rules that are derived from the secondary delays indicate where timetable adjustments are needed. In our last contribution in this field, we apply such adjustment rules for black-box optimization of timetables in a simulation environment