2,370 research outputs found
LTL Fragments are Hard for Standard Parameterisations
We classify the complexity of the LTL satisfiability and model checking
problems for several standard parameterisations. The investigated parameters
are temporal depth, number of propositional variables and formula treewidth,
resp., pathwidth. We show that all operator fragments of LTL under the
investigated parameterisations are intractable in the sense of parameterised
complexity.Comment: TIME 2015 conference versio
Polynomial fixed-parameter algorithms : a case study for longest path on interval graphs.
We study the design of fixed-parameter algorithms for problems already known to be solvable in polynomial time.
The main motivation is to get more efficient algorithms for problems with unattractive polynomial running times. Here, we focus on a fundamental graph problem: Longest Path; it is NP-hard in general but known to be solvable in O(n^4) time on n-vertex interval graphs. We show how to solve Longest Path on Interval Graphs, parameterized by vertex deletion number k to proper interval graphs, in O(k^9n) time. Notably, Longest Path is trivially solvable in linear time on proper interval graphs, and the parameter value k can be approximated up to a factor of 4 in linear time. From a more general perspective, we believe that using parameterized complexity analysis for polynomial-time solvable problems offers a very fertile ground for future studies for all sorts of algorithmic problems. It may enable a refined understanding of efficiency aspects for polynomial-time solvable problems, similarly to what classical parameterized complexity analysis does for NP-hard problems
Parameterized Complexity Dichotomy for Steiner Multicut
The Steiner Multicut problem asks, given an undirected graph G, terminals
sets T1,...,Tt V(G) of size at most p, and an integer k, whether
there is a set S of at most k edges or nodes s.t. of each set Ti at least one
pair of terminals is in different connected components of G \ S. This problem
generalizes several graph cut problems, in particular the Multicut problem (the
case p = 2), which is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k [Marx and
Razgon, Bousquet et al., STOC 2011].
We provide a dichotomy of the parameterized complexity of Steiner Multicut.
That is, for any combination of k, t, p, and the treewidth tw(G) as constant,
parameter, or unbounded, and for all versions of the problem (edge deletion and
node deletion with and without deletable terminals), we prove either that the
problem is fixed-parameter tractable or that the problem is hard (W[1]-hard or
even (para-)NP-complete). We highlight that:
- The edge deletion version of Steiner Multicut is fixed-parameter tractable
for the parameter k+t on general graphs (but has no polynomial kernel, even on
trees). We present two proofs: one using the randomized contractions technique
of Chitnis et al, and one relying on new structural lemmas that decompose the
Steiner cut into important separators and minimal s-t cuts.
- In contrast, both node deletion versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard
for the parameter k+t on general graphs.
- All versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k, even
when p=3 and the graph is a tree plus one node. Hence, the results of Marx and
Razgon, and Bousquet et al. do not generalize to Steiner Multicut.
Since we allow k, t, p, and tw(G) to be any constants, our characterization
includes a dichotomy for Steiner Multicut on trees (for tw(G) = 1), and a
polynomial time versus NP-hardness dichotomy (by restricting k,t,p,tw(G) to
constant or unbounded).Comment: As submitted to journal. This version also adds a proof of
fixed-parameter tractability for parameter k+t using the technique of
randomized contraction
A Parameterized Complexity View on Description Logic Reasoning
Description logics are knowledge representation languages that have been
designed to strike a balance between expressivity and computational
tractability. Many different description logics have been developed, and
numerous computational problems for these logics have been studied for their
computational complexity. However, essentially all complexity analyses of
reasoning problems for description logics use the one-dimensional framework of
classical complexity theory. The multi-dimensional framework of parameterized
complexity theory is able to provide a much more detailed image of the
complexity of reasoning problems.
In this paper we argue that the framework of parameterized complexity has a
lot to offer for the complexity analysis of description logic reasoning
problems---when one takes a progressive and forward-looking view on
parameterized complexity tools. We substantiate our argument by means of three
case studies. The first case study is about the problem of concept
satisfiability for the logic ALC with respect to nearly acyclic TBoxes. The
second case study concerns concept satisfiability for ALC concepts
parameterized by the number of occurrences of union operators and the number of
occurrences of full existential quantification. The third case study offers a
critical look at data complexity results from a parameterized complexity point
of view. These three case studies are representative for the wide range of uses
for parameterized complexity methods for description logic problems.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on
Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2018
- …