20,874 research outputs found

    A parallel priority queue with fast updates for GPU architectures

    Full text link
    The high computational throughput of modern graphics processing units (GPUs) make them the de-facto architecture for high-performance computing applications. However, to achieve peak performance, GPUs require highly parallel workloads, as well as memory access patterns that exhibit good locality of reference. As a result, many state-of-the-art algorithms and data structures designed for GPUs sacrifice work-optimality to achieve the necessary parallelism. Furthermore, some abstract data types are avoided completely due to there being no corresponding data structure that performs well on the GPU. One such abstract data type is the priority queue. Many well-known algorithms rely on priority queue operations as a building block. While various priority queue structures have been developed that are parallel, cache-aware, or cache-oblivious, none has been shown to be efficient on GPUs. In this paper, we present the parBucketHeap, a parallel, cache-efficient data structure designed for modern GPU architectures that supports standard priority queue operations, as well as bulk update. We analyze the structure in several well-known computational models and show that it provides both optimal parallelism and is cache-efficient. We implement the parBucketHeap and, using it, we solve the single-source shortest path (SSSP) problem. Experimental results indicate that, for sufficiently large, dense graphs with high diameter, we out-perform current state-of-the-art SSSP algorithms on the GPU by up to a factor of 5. Unlike existing GPU SSSP algorithms, our approach is work-optimal and places significantly less load on the GPU, reducing power consumption

    Parallel Combining: Benefits of Explicit Synchronization

    Get PDF
    A parallel batched data structure is designed to process synchronized batches of operations on the data structure using a parallel program. In this paper, we propose parallel combining, a technique that implements a concurrent data structure from a parallel batched one. The idea is that we explicitly synchronize concurrent operations into batches: one of the processes becomes a combiner which collects concurrent requests and initiates a parallel batched algorithm involving the owners (clients) of the collected requests. Intuitively, the cost of synchronizing the concurrent calls can be compensated by running the parallel batched algorithm. We validate the intuition via two applications. First, we use parallel combining to design a concurrent data structure optimized for read-dominated workloads, taking a dynamic graph data structure as an example. Second, we use a novel parallel batched priority queue to build a concurrent one. In both cases, we obtain performance gains with respect to the state-of-the-art algorithms

    The Adaptive Priority Queue with Elimination and Combining

    Full text link
    Priority queues are fundamental abstract data structures, often used to manage limited resources in parallel programming. Several proposed parallel priority queue implementations are based on skiplists, harnessing the potential for parallelism of the add() operations. In addition, methods such as Flat Combining have been proposed to reduce contention by batching together multiple operations to be executed by a single thread. While this technique can decrease lock-switching overhead and the number of pointer changes required by the removeMin() operations in the priority queue, it can also create a sequential bottleneck and limit parallelism, especially for non-conflicting add() operations. In this paper, we describe a novel priority queue design, harnessing the scalability of parallel insertions in conjunction with the efficiency of batched removals. Moreover, we present a new elimination algorithm suitable for a priority queue, which further increases concurrency on balanced workloads with similar numbers of add() and removeMin() operations. We implement and evaluate our design using a variety of techniques including locking, atomic operations, hardware transactional memory, as well as employing adaptive heuristics given the workload.Comment: Accepted at DISC'14 - this is the full version with appendices, including more algorithm

    Lock-free Concurrent Data Structures

    Full text link
    Concurrent data structures are the data sharing side of parallel programming. Data structures give the means to the program to store data, but also provide operations to the program to access and manipulate these data. These operations are implemented through algorithms that have to be efficient. In the sequential setting, data structures are crucially important for the performance of the respective computation. In the parallel programming setting, their importance becomes more crucial because of the increased use of data and resource sharing for utilizing parallelism. The first and main goal of this chapter is to provide a sufficient background and intuition to help the interested reader to navigate in the complex research area of lock-free data structures. The second goal is to offer the programmer familiarity to the subject that will allow her to use truly concurrent methods.Comment: To appear in "Programming Multi-core and Many-core Computing Systems", eds. S. Pllana and F. Xhafa, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computin

    A Bulk-Parallel Priority Queue in External Memory with STXXL

    Get PDF
    We propose the design and an implementation of a bulk-parallel external memory priority queue to take advantage of both shared-memory parallelism and high external memory transfer speeds to parallel disks. To achieve higher performance by decoupling item insertions and extractions, we offer two parallelization interfaces: one using "bulk" sequences, the other by defining "limit" items. In the design, we discuss how to parallelize insertions using multiple heaps, and how to calculate a dynamic prediction sequence to prefetch blocks and apply parallel multiway merge for extraction. Our experimental results show that in the selected benchmarks the priority queue reaches 75% of the full parallel I/O bandwidth of rotational disks and and 65% of SSDs, or the speed of sorting in external memory when bounded by computation.Comment: extended version of SEA'15 conference pape
    • …
    corecore