22 research outputs found

    Simplifying the Management of Complexity: as Achieved in Nature

    Get PDF
    Governance scientists Dr Shann Turnbull and Prof James Guthrie AM use stakeholder firms to illustrate how to simplify the management of complexity and use natural laws to transform corporations into common good enterprises to counter global existential risks

    Natural Computation of Cognition, from single cells up

    Get PDF
    At the time when the first models of cognitive architectures have been proposed, some forty years ago, the understanding of cognition, embodiment, and evolution was substantially different from today. So was the state of the art of information physics, information chemistry, bioinformatics, neuroinformatics, computational neuroscience, complexity theory, self-organization, theory of evolution, as well as the basic concepts of information and computation. Novel developments support a constructive interdisciplinary framework for cognitive architectures based on natural morphological computing, where interactions between constituents at different levels of organization of matter-energy and their corresponding time-dependentdynamics, lead to the complexification of agency and increased cognitive capacities of living organisms that unfold through evolution. Proposed info-computational framework for naturalizing cognition considers present updates (generalizations) of the concepts of information, computation, cognition, and evolution in order to attain an alignment with the current state of the art in corresponding research fields. Some important open questions are suggested for future research with implications for further development of cognitive and intelligent technologies

    Π•Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΌΠΎΠ·ΠΊΡƒ Ρƒ осіб Π· Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΠΌ Ρ€Ρ–Π²Π½Π΅ΠΌ Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ—Π·ΠΌΡƒ-Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—Π·ΠΌΡƒ

    Get PDF
    The formation of a human personality and the peculiarities of its social behavior are influenced by both biological characteristics and psychophysiological data. Therefore, in order to determine the prevailing socio-type of personality, it is necessary to take into account all aspects and features that may affect individual-psychological characteristics. In addition, neuromarkers that indicate altruistic and selfish social behavior will show the effective use of neurotrainings for their correction and explain the mechanisms of social adaptation.The aim of the research: to find differences in brain activity of individuals with different social type by registration of their electric activity.Methods: psychological testing method, event-related synchronization/desynchronization method.Results: Individuals with selfish type of social behavior chose selfish stimulus more often than individuals with altruistic type of social behavior. Individuals with selfish type of social behavior show higher indexes of spectrum power in alfa- and betha-range. Desynchronization reaction is typical for individuals with altruistic social behavior; synchronization reaction is typical for selfish-directed individuals. Synchronization in central and parietal areas in selfish-directed individuals is mostly shown as a reaction to altruistic stimulus; altruistic-directed individuals showed synchronization reaction to the altruistic stimulus in these areas.Conclusions: EEG data in alpha-range suggest that mechanisms of attention are involved for longer time period in the individuals with altruistic social behavior type.Β  The reaction to the opposite type of stimulus is characterized by the same behavioral effects, however, has different electroencephalographic characteristics. The results show the different nature of the subjective reaction to stimuli, which is opposite to the sociotype of the individuals. However, a more detailed analysis indicates a different neurophysiological and subjective component of these reactionsНа Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ чСловСчСской личности ΠΈ особСнностСй Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡŽΡ‚ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ биологичСскиС характСристики, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ психофизиологичСскиС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ. ΠŸΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ для опрСдСлСния ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ социотипа личности Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ всС аспСкты ΠΈ особСнности, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-психологичСскиС характСристики. ΠšΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, поиск Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² проявлСния Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ эгоистичСской ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ эффСктивно ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ½Π³Ρ‹ для ΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ‹ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ.ЦСль исслСдования - Π½Π°ΠΉΡ‚ΠΈ различия Π² Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° Π»ΠΈΡ† с Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ социотипом ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ рСгистрации ΠΈΡ… элСктричСской активности.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹: ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ психологичСского тСстирования, ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ синхронизации / дСсинхронизации, связанный с событиями.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹: Π»ΠΈΡ†Π° с эгоистичным Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния Ρ‡Π°Ρ‰Π΅ Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΈΡ€Π°Π»ΠΈ эгоистичСскиС стимулы, Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌ Π»ΠΈΡ†Π° с Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния. ВысокиС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ мощности спСктра Π² Π°Π»ΡŒΡ„Π°- ΠΈ Π±Π΅Ρ‚Π°-Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Ρƒ Π»ΠΈΡ† с эгоистичным Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния. РСакция дСсинхронизации Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° для людСй с Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ; рСакция синхронизации Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° для эгоистичСски Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ. Бинхронизация Π² Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ участках Π² эгоистичСски Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π»ΠΈΡ† прСимущСствСнно отобраТаСтся ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ рСакция Π½Π° Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒ. Для Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π»ΠΈΡ† Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° рСакция синхронизации Π½Π° Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ стимулы Π² этих участках.Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹: Π­Π­Π“-Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π² Π°Π»ΡŒΡ„Π°-Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ‹ внимания ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Ρƒ Π»ΠΈΡ† с Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ повСдСния. РСакция Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ раздраТитСля характСризуСтся Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅ повСдСнчСскими эффСктами, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ элСктроэнцСфалографичСскиС характСристики. ΠŸΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° стимулы, ΠΏΠΎ своСму Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ социотипу испытуСмого. Однако Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ нСйрофизиологичСских ΠΈ ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚ этих рСакцийНа формування Π»ΡŽΠ΄ΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— особистості Ρ‚Π° особливостСй Ρ—Ρ— ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ як Π±Ρ–ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Ρ– характСристики, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ Ρ– психофізіологічні ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π’ΠΎΠΌΡƒ для визначСння ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Π°ΠΆΠ°ΡŽΡ‡ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ соціотипу особистості Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…Ρ–Π΄Π½ΠΎ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ…ΠΎΠ²ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ усі аспСкти Ρ‚Π° особливості, які ΠΌΠΎΠΆΡƒΡ‚ΡŒ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ Π½Π° Ρ–Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ²Ρ–Π΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-психологічні характСристики. ΠšΡ€Ρ–ΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΏΠΎΡˆΡƒΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Ρ–Π² прояву Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ— Ρ‚Π° Сгоїстичної ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ використовувати Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ–Π½Π³ΠΈ для Ρ—Ρ… ΠΊΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†Ρ–Ρ— Ρ‚Π° пояснити ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½Ρ–Π·ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡ‚Π°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ—.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚Π° дослідТСння – Π·Π½Π°ΠΉΡ‚ΠΈ відмінності Π² Π΄Ρ–ΡΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ– ΠΌΠΎΠ·ΠΊΡƒ осіб Ρ–Π· Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΠΌ соціотипом ΡˆΠ»ΡΡ…ΠΎΠΌ рСєстрації Ρ—Ρ… Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ— активності.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ: ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ психологічного тСстування, ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ синхронізації / дСсинхронізації, ΠΏΠΎΠ²'язаний Π· подіями.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ: особи Ρ–Π· Сгоїстичним Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚Ρ–ΡˆΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡ€Π°Π»ΠΈ Сгоїстичні стимули, Π½Ρ–ΠΆ особи Ρ–Π· Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ. Π’ΠΈΡ‰Ρ– ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ потуТності спСктру Π² Π°Π»ΡŒΡ„Π°- Ρ– Π±Π΅Ρ‚Π°-Π΄Ρ–Π°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ– Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π² осіб Ρ–Π· Сгоїстичним Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ. РСакція дСсинхронізації Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° для людСй Π· Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡŽ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΎΡŽ; рСакція синхронізації Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° для Сгоїстично спрямованих осіб. Бинхронізація Π² Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ–ΠΉ Ρ– Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΌ'яній ділянках Π² Сгоїстично спрямованих осіб ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Ρ”Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ як рСакція Π½Π° Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊ. Для Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ спрямованих осіб Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π° рСакція синхронізації Π½Π° Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ– стимули Π² Ρ†ΠΈΡ… ділянках.Висновки: Π•Π•Π“-Π΄Π°Π½Ρ– Π² Π°Π»ΡŒΡ„Π°-Π΄Ρ–Π°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ– Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅, Ρ‰ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½Ρ–Π·ΠΌΠΈ ΡƒΠ²Π°Π³ΠΈ Π·Π°Π»ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π½Π° Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Ρ–ΡˆΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ–ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ часу Ρƒ осіб Π· Π°Π»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ—ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ. РСакція Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ”Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΆ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊ, ΠΌΠ°Ρ” Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½Ρ– Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ΅Π½Ρ†Π΅Ρ„Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Ρ– характСристики. ΠžΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½Ρ– Π΄Π°Π½Ρ– Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ суб'Ρ”ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡ— Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†Ρ–Ρ— Π½Π° стимули, Π·Π° своїм Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ»Π΅ΠΆΠ½Ρ– соціотипу дослідТуваного. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ–ΡˆΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»Ρ–Π· Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡƒΡ” Π½Π° Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΡ„Ρ–Π·Ρ–ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ– субєктивний ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚ Ρ†ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†Ρ–

    Natural Computational Architectures for Cognitive Info-Communication

    Get PDF
    Recent comprehensive overview of 40 years of research in cognitive architectures, (Kotseruba and Tsotsos 2020), evaluates modelling of the core cognitive abilities in humans, but only marginally addresses biologically plausible approaches based on natural computation. This mini review presentsa set of perspectives and approaches which have shaped the development of biologically inspired computational models in the recent past that can lead to the development of biologically more realistic cognitive architectures. For describing continuum of natural cognitive architectures, from basal cellular to human-level cognition, we use evolutionary info-computational framework, where natural/ physical/ morphological computation leads to evolution of increasingly complex cognitive systems. Forty years ago, when the first cognitive architectures have been proposed, understanding of cognition, embodiment and evolution was different. So was the state of the art of information physics, bioinformatics, information chemistry, computational neuroscience, complexity theory, selforganization, theory of evolution, information and computation. Novel developments support a constructive interdisciplinary framework for cognitive architectures in the context of computing nature, where interactions between constituents at different levels of organization lead to complexification of agency and increased cognitive capacities. We identify several important research questions for further investigation that can increase understanding of cognition in nature and inspire new developments of cognitive technologies. Recently, basal cell cognition attracted a lot of interest for its possible applications in medicine, new computing technologies, as well as micro- and nanorobotics. Bio-cognition of cells connected into tissues/organs, and organisms with the group (social) levels of information processing provides insights into cognition mechanisms that can support the development of new AI platforms and cognitive robotics

    A Fractal Epistemology for Transpersonal Psychology

    Get PDF
    The role of science has been controversial within the nascent field of transpersonal psychology. Traditional linear and reductionist models are insufficient to address rare and unreproducible states of mind, fringe rather than normative experiences, and highly personal or culturally specific aspects of awareness. Through a fractal epistemology this paper introduces novel metaphors, models, and methods within a more holistic, organic, and synthetic branch of science. Principles of the epistemology illuminate observer dependence, fuzzy boundaries, recursive patterns, and higher dimensional phenomena that emerge within the infinite expanses between ordinary, finite (Euclidean) dimensions

    How cybernetics explains behavioural tensegrity and its advantages for society

    Get PDF
    This article explains the crucial role of the paradoxical dual contrary~complementary but interdependent properties of tensegrity. It is a neglected phenomenon in understanding how living things and their social organisations can become self-regulating and self-governing. Tensegrity is a defining feature of the architecture of nature. It is the driver of evolution. Organisations that include tensegrity into a polycentric self-governing process identified by Ostrom establish a basis from which to form an ecological form of governance for citizens to self-govern the sustainability of their host bioregions for the global common good. This requires engineering system scientists working with social scientists in educating students to become governance architects to custom design ecological firms. Research opportunities are identified in six hypotheses that include fundamental aspects of the universe

    Polycentric self-governance and Indigenous knowledge

    Get PDF
    This article's main aim is to discuss research exploring how the self-governing practices found in Indigenous societies, biota and modern organisations can be embedded into the constitutions of legal entities to protect and share the wellbeing of humanity, biota and the planet. In this paper, we explore how Australian Indigenous knowledge and practices can be embedded into organisational entities and discuss how this can be achieved by reformatting Ostrom's design principles to be incorporated into corporate constitutions following an ecological form of governance practised by Indigenous Australians. This form of polycentric self-governance can aggregate the voices of minorities representing local environments up to a global level. We use case studies, system science and biomimicry to explore polycentric self-governance and how organisations can adopt it to focus on the wellbeing of all stakeholders. In particular, the paper highlights how Indigenous knowledge can contribute globally to achieving societal sustainability
    corecore