5,164 research outputs found

    Taming Numbers and Durations in the Model Checking Integrated Planning System

    Full text link
    The Model Checking Integrated Planning System (MIPS) is a temporal least commitment heuristic search planner based on a flexible object-oriented workbench architecture. Its design clearly separates explicit and symbolic directed exploration algorithms from the set of on-line and off-line computed estimates and associated data structures. MIPS has shown distinguished performance in the last two international planning competitions. In the last event the description language was extended from pure propositional planning to include numerical state variables, action durations, and plan quality objective functions. Plans were no longer sequences of actions but time-stamped schedules. As a participant of the fully automated track of the competition, MIPS has proven to be a general system; in each track and every benchmark domain it efficiently computed plans of remarkable quality. This article introduces and analyzes the most important algorithmic novelties that were necessary to tackle the new layers of expressiveness in the benchmark problems and to achieve a high level of performance. The extensions include critical path analysis of sequentially generated plans to generate corresponding optimal parallel plans. The linear time algorithm to compute the parallel plan bypasses known NP hardness results for partial ordering by scheduling plans with respect to the set of actions and the imposed precedence relations. The efficiency of this algorithm also allows us to improve the exploration guidance: for each encountered planning state the corresponding approximate sequential plan is scheduled. One major strength of MIPS is its static analysis phase that grounds and simplifies parameterized predicates, functions and operators, that infers knowledge to minimize the state description length, and that detects domain object symmetries. The latter aspect is analyzed in detail. MIPS has been developed to serve as a complete and optimal state space planner, with admissible estimates, exploration engines and branching cuts. In the competition version, however, certain performance compromises had to be made, including floating point arithmetic, weighted heuristic search exploration according to an inadmissible estimate and parameterized optimization

    Finite Boolean Algebras for Solid Geometry using Julia's Sparse Arrays

    Full text link
    The goal of this paper is to introduce a new method in computer-aided geometry of solid modeling. We put forth a novel algebraic technique to evaluate any variadic expression between polyhedral d-solids (d = 2, 3) with regularized operators of union, intersection, and difference, i.e., any CSG tree. The result is obtained in three steps: first, by computing an independent set of generators for the d-space partition induced by the input; then, by reducing the solid expression to an equivalent logical formula between Boolean terms made by zeros and ones; and, finally, by evaluating this expression using bitwise operators. This method is implemented in Julia using sparse arrays. The computational evaluation of every possible solid expression, usually denoted as CSG (Constructive Solid Geometry), is reduced to an equivalent logical expression of a finite set algebra over the cells of a space partition, and solved by native bitwise operators.Comment: revised version submitted to Computer-Aided Geometric Desig

    Timing Measurement Platform for Arbitrary Black-Box Circuits Based on Transition Probability

    No full text

    Parallel symbolic state-space exploration is difficult, but what is the alternative?

    Full text link
    State-space exploration is an essential step in many modeling and analysis problems. Its goal is to find the states reachable from the initial state of a discrete-state model described. The state space can used to answer important questions, e.g., "Is there a dead state?" and "Can N become negative?", or as a starting point for sophisticated investigations expressed in temporal logic. Unfortunately, the state space is often so large that ordinary explicit data structures and sequential algorithms cannot cope, prompting the exploration of (1) parallel approaches using multiple processors, from simple workstation networks to shared-memory supercomputers, to satisfy large memory and runtime requirements and (2) symbolic approaches using decision diagrams to encode the large structured sets and relations manipulated during state-space generation. Both approaches have merits and limitations. Parallel explicit state-space generation is challenging, but almost linear speedup can be achieved; however, the analysis is ultimately limited by the memory and processors available. Symbolic methods are a heuristic that can efficiently encode many, but not all, functions over a structured and exponentially large domain; here the pitfalls are subtler: their performance varies widely depending on the class of decision diagram chosen, the state variable order, and obscure algorithmic parameters. As symbolic approaches are often much more efficient than explicit ones for many practical models, we argue for the need to parallelize symbolic state-space generation algorithms, so that we can realize the advantage of both approaches. This is a challenging endeavor, as the most efficient symbolic algorithm, Saturation, is inherently sequential. We conclude by discussing challenges, efforts, and promising directions toward this goal

    Advanced flight control system study

    Get PDF
    A fly by wire flight control system architecture designed for high reliability includes spare sensor and computer elements to permit safe dispatch with failed elements, thereby reducing unscheduled maintenance. A methodology capable of demonstrating that the architecture does achieve the predicted performance characteristics consists of a hierarchy of activities ranging from analytical calculations of system reliability and formal methods of software verification to iron bird testing followed by flight evaluation. Interfacing this architecture to the Lockheed S-3A aircraft for flight test is discussed. This testbed vehicle can be expanded to support flight experiments in advanced aerodynamics, electromechanical actuators, secondary power systems, flight management, new displays, and air traffic control concepts

    The "MIND" Scalable PIM Architecture

    Get PDF
    MIND (Memory, Intelligence, and Network Device) is an advanced parallel computer architecture for high performance computing and scalable embedded processing. It is a Processor-in-Memory (PIM) architecture integrating both DRAM bit cells and CMOS logic devices on the same silicon die. MIND is multicore with multiple memory/processor nodes on each chip and supports global shared memory across systems of MIND components. MIND is distinguished from other PIM architectures in that it incorporates mechanisms for efficient support of a global parallel execution model based on the semantics of message-driven multithreaded split-transaction processing. MIND is designed to operate either in conjunction with other conventional microprocessors or in standalone arrays of like devices. It also incorporates mechanisms for fault tolerance, real time execution, and active power management. This paper describes the major elements and operational methods of the MIND architecture

    Parallel source code transformation techniques using design patterns

    Get PDF
    Mención Internacional en el título de doctorIn recent years, the traditional approaches for improving performance, such as increasing the clock frequency, has come to a dead-end. To tackle this issue, parallel architectures, such as multi-/many-core processors, have been envisioned to increase the performance by providing greater processing capabilities. However, programming efficiently for this architectures demands big efforts in order to transform sequential applications into parallel and to optimize such applications. Compared to sequential programming, designing and implementing parallel applications for operating on modern hardware poses a number of new challenges to developers such as data races, deadlocks, load imbalance, etc. To pave the way, parallel design patterns provide a way to encapsulate algorithmic aspects, allowing users to implement robust, readable and portable solutions with such high-level abstractions. Basically, these patterns instantiate parallelism while hiding away the complexity of concurrency mechanisms, such as thread management, synchronizations or data sharing. Nonetheless, frameworks following this philosophy does not share the same interface and users require understanding different libraries, and their capabilities, not only to decide which fits best for their purposes but also to properly leverage them. Furthermore, in order to parallelize these applications, it is necessary to analyze the sequential code in order to detect the regions of code that can be parallelized that is a time consuming and complex task. Additionally, different libraries targeted to specific devices provide some algorithms implementations that are already parallel and highly-tuned. In these situations, it is also necessary to analyze and determine which routine implementation is the most suitable for a given problem. To tackle these issues, this thesis aims at simplifying and minimizing the necessary efforts to transform sequential applications into parallel. This way, resulting codes will improve their performance by fully exploiting the available resources while the development efforts will be considerably reduced. Basically, in this thesis, we contribute with the following. First, we propose a technique to detect potential parallel patterns in sequential code. Second, we provide a novel generic C++ interface for parallel patterns which acts as a switch among existing frameworks. Third, we implement a framework that is able to transform sequential code into parallel using the proposed pattern discovery technique and pattern interface. Finally, we propose mechanisms that are able to select the most suitable device and routine implementation to solve a given problem based on previous performance information. The evaluation demonstrates that using the proposed techniques can minimize the refactoring and optimization time while improving the performance of the resulting applications with respect to the original code.En los últimos años, las técnicas tradicionales para mejorar el rendimiento, como es el caso del incremento de la frecuencia de reloj, han llegado a sus límites. Con el fin de seguir mejorando el rendimiento, se han desarrollado las arquitecturas paralelas, las cuales proporcionan un incremento del rendimiento al estar provistas de mayores capacidades de procesamiento. Sin embargo, programar de forma eficiente para estas arquitecturas requieren de grandes esfuerzos por parte de los desarrolladores. Comparado con la programación secuencial, diseñar e implementar aplicaciones paralelas enfocadas a trabajar en estas arquitecturas presentan una gran cantidad de dificultades como son las condiciones de carrera, los deadlocks o el incorrecto balanceo de la carga. En este sentido, los patrones paralelos son una forma de encapsular aspectos algorítmicos de las aplicaciones permitiendo el desarrollo de soluciones robustas, portables y legibles gracias a las abstracciones de alto nivel. En general, estos patrones son capaces de proporcionar el paralelismo a la vez que ocultan las complejidades derivadas de los mecanismos de control de concurrencia necesarios como el manejo de los hilos, las sincronizaciones o la compartición de datos. No obstante, los diferentes frameworks que siguen esta filosofía no comparten una única interfaz lo que conlleva que los usuarios deban conocer múltiples bibliotecas y sus capacidades, con el fin de decidir cuál de ellos es mejor para una situación concreta y como usarlos de forma eficiente. Además, con el fin de paralelizar aplicaciones existentes, es necesario analizar e identificar las regiones del código que pueden ser paralelizadas, lo cual es una tarea ardua y compleja. Además, algunos algoritmos ya se encuentran implementados en paralelo y optimizados para arquitecturas concretas en diversas bibliotecas. Esto da lugar a que sea necesario analizar y determinar que implementación concreta es la más adecuada para solucionar un problema dado. Para paliar estas situaciones, está tesis busca simplificar y minimizar el esfuerzo necesario para transformar aplicaciones secuenciales en paralelas. De esta forma, los códigos resultantes serán capaces de explotar los recursos disponibles a la vez que se reduce considerablemente el esfuerzo de desarrollo necesario. En general, esta tesis contribuye con lo siguiente. En primer lugar, se propone una técnica de detección de patrones paralelos en códigos secuenciales. En segundo lugar, se presenta una interfaz genérica de patrones paralelos para C++ que permite seleccionar la implementación de dichos patrones proporcionada por frameworks ya existentes. En tercer lugar, se introduce un framework de transformación de código secuencial a paralelo que hace uso de las técnicas de detección de patrones y la interfaz presentadas. Finalmente, se proponen mecanismos capaces de seleccionar la implementación más adecuada para solucionar un problema concreto basándose en el rendimiento obtenido en ejecuciones previas. Gracias a la evaluación realizada se ha podido demostrar que uso de las técnicas presentadas pueden minimizar el tiempo necesario para transformar y optimizar el código a la vez que mejora el rendimiento de las aplicaciones transformadas.Programa Oficial de Doctorado en Ciencia y Tecnología InformáticaPresidente: David Expósito Singh.- Secretario: Rafael Asenjo Plaza.- Vocal: Marco Aldinucc
    corecore