23 research outputs found
Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects
Recently, social phenomena have received a lot of attention not only from
social scientists, but also from physicists, mathematicians and computer
scientists, in the emerging interdisciplinary field of complex system science.
Opinion dynamics is one of the processes studied, since opinions are the
drivers of human behaviour, and play a crucial role in many global challenges
that our complex world and societies are facing: global financial crises,
global pandemics, growth of cities, urbanisation and migration patterns, and
last but not least important, climate change and environmental sustainability
and protection. Opinion formation is a complex process affected by the
interplay of different elements, including the individual predisposition, the
influence of positive and negative peer interaction (social networks playing a
crucial role in this respect), the information each individual is exposed to,
and many others. Several models inspired from those in use in physics have been
developed to encompass many of these elements, and to allow for the
identification of the mechanisms involved in the opinion formation process and
the understanding of their role, with the practical aim of simulating opinion
formation and spreading under various conditions. These modelling schemes range
from binary simple models such as the voter model, to multi-dimensional
continuous approaches. Here, we provide a review of recent methods, focusing on
models employing both peer interaction and external information, and
emphasising the role that less studied mechanisms, such as disagreement, has in
driving the opinion dynamics. [...]Comment: 42 pages, 6 figure
Echo chamber formation sharpened by priority users
Priority users (e.g., verified profiles on Twitter) are social media users
whose content is promoted by recommendation algorithms. However, the impact of
this heterogeneous user influence on opinion dynamics, such as polarization
phenomena, is unknown. We conduct a computational mechanistic investigation of
such consequences in a stylized setting. First, we allow priority users, whose
content has greater reach (similar to algorithmic boosting), into an opinion
model on adaptive networks. Then, to exploit this gain in influence, we
incorporate stubborn user behavior, i.e., zealot users who remain committed to
opinions throughout the dynamics. Using a novel measure of echo chamber
formation, we find that prioritizing users can inadvertently reduce
polarization if they post according to the same rule but sharpen echo chamber
formation if they behave heterogeneously. Moreover, we show that a minority of
extremist ideologues (i.e., users who are both stubborn and priority) can push
the system into a transition from consensus to polarization with echo chambers.
Our findings imply that the implementation of the platform's prioritization
policy should be carefully monitored in order to ensure there is no abuse of
users with extra influence
Opinion formation on evolving network. The DPA method applied to a nonlocal cross-diffusion PDE-ODE system
We study a system of nonlocal aggregation cross-diffusion PDEs that describe
the evolution of opinion densities on a network. The PDEs are coupled with a
system of ODEs that describe the time evolution of the agents on the network.
Firstly, we apply the Deterministic Particle Approximation (DPA) method to the
aforementioned system in order to prove the existence of solutions under
suitable assumptions on the interactions between agents. Later on, we present
an explicit model for opinion formation on an evolving network. The opinions
evolve based on both the distance between the agents on the network and the
'attitude areas,' which depend on the distance between the agents' opinions.
The position of the agents on the network evolves based on the distance between
the agents' opinions. The goal is to study radicalization, polarization, and
fragmentation of the population while changing its open-mindedness and the
radius of interaction
Modeling algorithmic bias : simplicial complexes and evolving network topologies
Every day, people inform themselves and create their opinions on social networks. Although these platforms have promoted the access and dissemination of information, they may expose readers to manipulative, biased, and disinformative content-co-causes of polarization/radicalization. Moreover, recommendation algorithms, intended initially to enhance platform usage, are likely to augment such phenomena, generating the so-called Algorithmic Bias. In this work, we propose two extensions of the Algorithmic Bias model and analyze them on scale-free and Erdos-Renyi random network topologies. Our first extension introduces a mechanism of link rewiring so that the underlying structure co-evolves with the opinion dynamics, generating the Adaptive Algorithmic Bias model. The second one explicitly models a peer-pressure mechanism where a majority-if there is one-can attract a disagreeing individual, pushing them to conform. As a result, we observe that the co-evolution of opinions and network structure does not significantly impact the final state when the latter is much slower than the former. On the other hand, peer pressure enhances consensus mitigating the effects of both "close-mindedness" and algorithmic filtering
Network polarization, filter bubbles, and echo chambers: An annotated review of measures and reduction methods
Polarization arises when the underlying network connecting the members of a
community or society becomes characterized by highly connected groups with weak
inter-group connectivity. The increasing polarization, the strengthening of
echo chambers, and the isolation caused by information filters in social
networks are increasingly attracting the attention of researchers from
different areas of knowledge such as computer science, economics, social and
political sciences. This work presents an annotated review of network
polarization measures and models used to handle the polarization. Several
approaches for measuring polarization in graphs and networks were identified,
including those based on homophily, modularity, random walks, and balance
theory. The strategies used for reducing polarization include methods that
propose edge or node editions (including insertions or deletions, as well as
edge weight modifications), changes in social network design, or changes in the
recommendation systems embedded in these networks.Comment: Corrected a typo in Section 3.2; the rest remains unchange
Generating Strong Diversity of Opinions: Agent Models of Continuous Opinion Dynamics
Opinion dynamics is the study of how opinions in a group of individuals change over time. A goal of opinion dynamics modelers has long been to find a social science-based model that generates strong diversity -- smooth, stable, possibly multi-modal distributions of opinions. This research lays the foundations for and develops such a model. First, a taxonomy is developed to precisely describe agent schedules in an opinion dynamics model. The importance of scheduling is shown with applications to generalized forms of two models. Next, the meta-contrast influence field (MIF) model is defined. It is rooted in self-categorization theory and improves on the existing meta-contrast model by providing a properly scaled, continuous influence basis. Finally, the MIF-Local Repulsion (MIF-LR) model is developed and presented. This augments the MIF model with a formulation of uniqueness theory. The MIF-LR model generates strong diversity. An application of the model shows that partisan polarization can be explained by increased non-local social ties enabled by communications technology
Coordination of Decisions in a Spatial Agent Model
For a binary choice problem, the spatial coordination of decisions in an
agent community is investigated both analytically and by means of stochastic
computer simulations. The individual decisions are based on different local
information generated by the agents with a finite lifetime and disseminated in
the system with a finite velocity. We derive critical parameters for the
emergence of minorities and majorities of agents making opposite decisions and
investigate their spatial organization. We find that dependent on two essential
parameters describing the local impact and the spatial dissemination of
information, either a definite stable minority/majority relation
(single-attractor regime) or a broad range of possible values (multi-attractor
regime) occurs. In the latter case, the outcome of the decision process becomes
rather diverse and hard to predict, both with respect to the share of the
majority and their spatial distribution. We further investigate how a
dissemination of information on different time scales affects the outcome of
the decision process. We find that a more ``efficient'' information exchange
within a subpopulation provides a suitable way to stabilize their majority
status and to reduce ``diversity'' and uncertainty in the decision process.Comment: submitted for publication in Physica A (31 pages incl. 17 multi-part
figures
A Survey of Agent-Based Modeling Practices (January 1998 to July 2008)
In the 1990s, Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) began gaining popularity and represents a departure from the more classical simulation approaches. This departure, its recent development and its increasing application by non-traditional simulation disciplines indicates the need to continuously assess the current state of ABM and identify opportunities for improvement. To begin to satisfy this need, we surveyed and collected data from 279 articles from 92 unique publication outlets in which the authors had constructed and analyzed an agent-based model. From this large data set we establish the current practice of ABM in terms of year of publication, field of study, simulation software used, purpose of the simulation, acceptable validation criteria, validation techniques and complete description of the simulation. Based on the current practice we discuss six improvements needed to advance ABM as an analysis tool. These improvements include the development of ABM specific tools that are independent of software, the development of ABM as an independent discipline with a common language that extends across domains, the establishment of expectations for ABM that match their intended purposes, the requirement of complete descriptions of the simulation so others can independently replicate the results, the requirement that all models be completely validated and the development and application of statistical and non-statistical validation techniques specifically for ABM.Agent-Based Modeling, Survey, Current Practices, Simulation Validation, Simulation Purpose