7 research outputs found

    On the size of identifying codes in triangle-free graphs

    Get PDF
    In an undirected graph GG, a subset CV(G)C\subseteq V(G) such that CC is a dominating set of GG, and each vertex in V(G)V(G) is dominated by a distinct subset of vertices from CC, is called an identifying code of GG. The concept of identifying codes was introduced by Karpovsky, Chakrabarty and Levitin in 1998. For a given identifiable graph GG, let \M(G) be the minimum cardinality of an identifying code in GG. In this paper, we show that for any connected identifiable triangle-free graph GG on nn vertices having maximum degree Δ3\Delta\geq 3, \M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}{\Delta+o(\Delta)}. This bound is asymptotically tight up to constants due to various classes of graphs including (Δ1)(\Delta-1)-ary trees, which are known to have their minimum identifying code of size nnΔ1+o(1)n-\tfrac{n}{\Delta-1+o(1)}. We also provide improved bounds for restricted subfamilies of triangle-free graphs, and conjecture that there exists some constant cc such that the bound \M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}{\Delta}+c holds for any nontrivial connected identifiable graph GG

    Identifying codes of corona product graphs

    Full text link
    For a vertex xx of a graph GG, let NG[x]N_G[x] be the set of xx with all of its neighbors in GG. A set CC of vertices is an {\em identifying code} of GG if the sets NG[x]CN_G[x]\cap C are nonempty and distinct for all vertices xx. If GG admits an identifying code, we say that GG is identifiable and denote by γID(G)\gamma^{ID}(G) the minimum cardinality of an identifying code of GG. In this paper, we study the identifying code of the corona product HGH\odot G of graphs HH and GG. We first give a necessary and sufficient condition for the identifiable corona product HGH\odot G, and then express γID(HG)\gamma^{ID}(H\odot G) in terms of γID(G)\gamma^{ID}(G) and the (total) domination number of HH. Finally, we compute γID(HG)\gamma^{ID}(H\odot G) for some special graphs GG

    Random subgraphs make identification affordable

    Full text link
    An identifying code of a graph is a dominating set which uniquely determines all the vertices by their neighborhood within the code. Whereas graphs with large minimum degree have small domination number, this is not the case for the identifying code number (the size of a smallest identifying code), which indeed is not even a monotone parameter with respect to graph inclusion. We show that every graph GG with nn vertices, maximum degree Δ=ω(1)\Delta=\omega(1) and minimum degree δclogΔ\delta\geq c\log{\Delta}, for some constant c>0c>0, contains a large spanning subgraph which admits an identifying code with size O(nlogΔδ)O\left(\frac{n\log{\Delta}}{\delta}\right). In particular, if δ=Θ(n)\delta=\Theta(n), then GG has a dense spanning subgraph with identifying code O(logn)O\left(\log n\right), namely, of asymptotically optimal size. The subgraph we build is created using a probabilistic approach, and we use an interplay of various random methods to analyze it. Moreover we show that the result is essentially best possible, both in terms of the number of deleted edges and the size of the identifying code

    Bounds for identifying codes in terms of degree parameters

    Full text link
    An identifying code is a subset of vertices of a graph such that each vertex is uniquely determined by its neighbourhood within the identifying code. If \M(G) denotes the minimum size of an identifying code of a graph GG, it was conjectured by F. Foucaud, R. Klasing, A. Kosowski and A. Raspaud that there exists a constant cc such that if a connected graph GG with nn vertices and maximum degree dd admits an identifying code, then \M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{d}+c. We use probabilistic tools to show that for any d3d\geq 3, \M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{\Theta(d)} holds for a large class of graphs containing, among others, all regular graphs and all graphs of bounded clique number. This settles the conjecture (up to constants) for these classes of graphs. In the general case, we prove \M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{\Theta(d^{3})}. In a second part, we prove that in any graph GG of minimum degree δ\delta and girth at least 5, \M(G)\leq(1+o_\delta(1))\tfrac{3\log\delta}{2\delta}n. Using the former result, we give sharp estimates for the size of the minimum identifying code of random dd-regular graphs, which is about logddn\tfrac{\log d}{d}n

    On location, domination and information retrieval

    Get PDF
    The thesis is divided into two main branches: identifying and locatingdominating codes, and information retrieval. The former topics are motivated by the aim to locate objects in sensor networks (or other similar applications) and the latter one by the need to retrieve information in memories such as DNA data storage systems. Albeit the underlying applications, the study on these topics mainly belongs to discrete mathematics; more specically, to the elds of coding and graph theory. The sensor networks are usually represented by graphs where vertices represent the monitored locations and edges the connections between the locations. Moreover, the locations of the sensors are determined by a code. Furthermore, the desired properties of the sensor network are deeply linked with the properties of the underlying code. The number of errors in reading the data is abundant in the DNA data storage systems. In particular, there can occur more errors than a reasonable error-correcting code can handle. However, this problem is somewhat oset by the possibility to obtain multiple approximations of the same information from the data storage. Hence, the information retrieval process can be modelled by the Levenshtein's channel model, where a message is sent through multiple noisy channels and multiple outputs are received. In the rst two papers of the thesis, we introduce and study the new concepts of self- and solid-locating-dominating codes as a natural analogy to self-identifying codes with respect to locating-dominating codes. The rst paper introduces these new codes and considers them in some graphs such as the Hamming graphs. Then, in the second paper, we broaden our view on the topic by considering graph theoretical questions. We give optimal codes in multiple dierent graph classes and some more general results using concepts such as the Dilworth number and graph complements. The third paper focuses on the q-ary Hamming spaces. In particular, we disprove a conjecture proposed by Goddard and Wash related to identifying codes. In the fourth paper, we return to self- and solid-locating-dominating codes and give optimal codes in some graph classes and consider their densities in innite graphs. In the fth paper, we consider information retrieval in memories; in particular, the Levenshtein's channel model. In the channel model, we transmit some codeword belonging to the binary Hamming space through multiple identical channels. With the help of multiple dierent outputs, we give a list of codewords which may have been sent. In the paper, we study the number of channels required to have a rather small (constant) list size when the properties of the channels, the code and the dimension of the Hamming space are xed. In particular, we give an exact relation between the number of channels and the asymptotic value of the maximum list size.Väitöskirja käsittelee kahta aihetta: identioivia ja paikantavia peittokoodeja sekä tiedon noutamista muistista. Ensimmäisen aiheen motivaationa on objektien paikantaminen sensoriverkoista (sekä muut samankaltaiset sovellukset) ja jälkimmäisen tiedonnouto DNA-muisteista. Näiden aiheiden tutkimus kuuluu diskreettiin matematiikkaan, täsmällisemmin koodaus- ja graa-teoriaan. Sensoriverkkoja kuvataan yleensä graafeilla, joissa solmut esittävät tarkkailtuja kohteita ja viivat yhteyksiä näiden kohteiden välillä. Edelleen sensorien paikat määräytyvät annetun koodin perusteella. Tästä johtuen sensoriverkon halutut ominaisuudet pohjautuvat vahvasti alla olevaan koodiin. Luettaessa tietoa DNA-muisteista tapahtuvien virheiden määrä saattaa olla erittäin suuri; erityisesti suurempi kuin kiinnitetyn virheitä korjaavan koodin korjauskyky. Toisaalta tilanne ei ole aivan näin ongelmallinen, sillä DNA-muisteista voidaan saada useita eri arvioita muistiin tallennetusta tiedosta. Näistä syistä johtuen tietojen noutamista DNA-muisteista voidaan mallintaa käyttäen Levenshteinin kanavamallia. Kanavamallissa yksi viesti lähetetään useiden häiriöisten kanavien kautta ja näin vastaanotetaan useita viestejä (yksi jokaisesta kanavasta). Väitöskirjan kahdessa ensimmäisessä julkaisussa esitellään ja tutkitaan uusia paikantavien peittokoodien luokkia, jotka pohjautuvat aiemmin tutkittuihin itse-identioiviin koodeihin. Ensimmäisessä julkaisussa on esitelty nämä koodiluokat sekä tutkittu niitä joissain graafeissa kuten Hammingin graafeissa. Tämän jälkeen toisessa julkaisussa käsitellään yleisiä graa-teoreettisia kysymyksiä. Julkaisussa esitetään optimaaliset koodit useille graaperheille sekä joitain yleisempiä tuloksia käyttäen mm. Dilworthin lukua sekä graakomplementteja. Kolmas julkaisu keskittyy q-arisiin Hammingin avaruuksiin. Erityisesti julkaisussa todistetaan vääräksi Goddardin ja Washin aiemmin esittämä identioivia koodeja koskeva otaksuma. Neljäs artikkeli käsittelee jo kahdessa ensimmäisessä artikkelissa esiteltyjä paikantavien peittokoodien luokkia. Artikkeli esittää optimaalisia koodeja useille graaperheille sekä käsittelee äärettömiä graafeja. Viides artikkeli käsittelee tiedonnoutoa ja erityisesti Levenshteinin kanavamallia. Kanavamallissa binääriseen Hammingin avaruuteen kuuluva koodisana lähetetään useiden identtisten kanavien läpi. Näistä kanavista vastaanotetaan useita eri arvioita lähetetystä koodisanasta ja rakennetaan lista mahdollisesti lähetetyistä sanoista. Artikkelissa tutkitaan kuinka monta kanavaa tarvitaan, jotta tämän listan koko on pieni (vakio), kun kanavien ominaisuudet, koodi ja Hammingin avaruuden dimensio on kiinnitetty. Erityisesti löydetään täsmällinen suhde kanavien lukumäärän ja asymptoottisesti maksimaalisen listan koon välille

    Identifying codes in bipartite graphs of given maximum degree

    No full text
    An identifying code of a closed-twin-free graph G is a set S of vertices of G such that any two vertices in G have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhoods and S. It was conjectured in [F. Foucaud, R. Klasing, A. Kosowski, A. Raspaud. On the size of identifying codes in triangle-free graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2012] that there exists an absolute constant c such that for every connected graph G of order n and maximum degree ∆, G admits an identifying code of size at most ∆−1 ∆ n + c. We provide significant support for this conjecture by proving it for the class of all bipartite graphs that do not contain any pairs of open-twins of degree at least 2. In particular, this class of bipartite graphs contains all trees and more generally, all bipartite graphs without 4-cycles. Moreover, our proof allows us to precisely determine the constant c for the considered class, and the list of graphs needing c > 0. For ∆ = 2 (the graph is a path or a cycle), it is long known that c = 3/2 suffices. For connected graphs in the considered graph class, for each ∆ ≥ 3, we show that c = 1/∆ ≤ 1/3 suffices and that c is required to be positive only for a finite number of trees. In particular, for ∆ = 3, there are 12 trees with diameter at most 6 with a positive constant c and, for each ∆ ≥ 4, the only tree with positive constant c is the ∆-star. Our proof is based on induction and utilizes recent results from [F. Foucaud, T. Lehtilä. Revisiting and improving upper bounds for identifying codes. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2022]
    corecore