37,303 research outputs found
On the size of homogeneous and of depth four formulas with low individual degree
International audienceLet r ≥ 1 be an integer. Let us call a polynomial f (x_1,...,x_N) ∈ F[x] as a multi-r-ic polynomial if the degree of f with respect to any variable is at most r (this generalizes the notion of multilinear polynomials). We investigate arithmetic circuits in which the output is syntactically forced to be a multi-r-ic polynomial and refer to these as multi-r-ic circuits. We prove lower bounds for several subclasses of such circuits. Specifically, first define the formal degree of a node α with respect to a variable x_i inductively as follows. For a leaf α it is 1 if α is labelled with x_i and zero otherwise; for an internal node α labelled with × (respectively +) it is the sum of (respectively the maximum of) the formal degrees of the children with respect to x_i. We call an arithmetic circuit as a multi-r-ic circuit if the formal degree of the output node with respect to any variable is at most r. We prove lower bounds for various subclasses of multi-r-ic circuits
Sums of products of polynomials in few variables : lower bounds and polynomial identity testing
We study the complexity of representing polynomials as a sum of products of
polynomials in few variables. More precisely, we study representations of the
form such that each is
an arbitrary polynomial that depends on at most variables. We prove the
following results.
1. Over fields of characteristic zero, for every constant such that , we give an explicit family of polynomials , where
is of degree in variables, such that any
representation of the above type for with requires . This strengthens a recent result of Kayal and Saha
[KS14a] which showed similar lower bounds for the model of sums of products of
linear forms in few variables. It is known that any asymptotic improvement in
the exponent of the lower bounds (even for ) would separate VP
and VNP[KS14a].
2. We obtain a deterministic subexponential time blackbox polynomial identity
testing (PIT) algorithm for circuits computed by the above model when and
the individual degree of each variable in are at most and
for any constant . We get quasipolynomial running
time when . The PIT algorithm is obtained by combining our
lower bounds with the hardness-randomness tradeoffs developed in [DSY09, KI04].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nontrivial PIT algorithm for
this model (even for the case ), and the first nontrivial PIT algorithm
obtained from lower bounds for small depth circuits
On Computing Multilinear Polynomials Using Multi-r-ic Depth Four Circuits
International audienceIn this paper, we are interested in understanding the complexity of computing multilinear polynomials using depth four circuits in which polynomial computed at every node has a bound on the individual degree of r (referred to as multi-r-ic circuits). The goal of this study is to make progress towards proving superpolynomial lower bounds for general depth four circuits computing multilinear polynomials, by proving better and better bounds as the value of r increases. Recently, Kayal, Saha and Tavenas (Theory of Computing, 2018) showed that any depth four arithmetic circuit of bounded individual degree r computing a multilinear polynomial on n^O(1) variables and degree d = o(n), must have size at least (n/r^1.1)^{\sqrt{d/r}} when r is o(d) and is strictly less than n^1/1.1. This bound however deteriorates with increasing r. It is a natural question to ask if we can prove a bound that does not deteriorate with increasing r or a bound that holds for a larger regime of r. We here prove a lower bound which does not deteriorate with r , however for a specific instance of d = d (n) but for a wider range of r. Formally, we show that there exists an explicit polynomial on n^{O(1)} variables and degree Θ(log^2(n)) such that any depth four circuit of bounded individual degree r < n^0.2 must have size at least exp(Ω (log^2 n)). This improvement is obtained by suitably adapting the complexity measure of Kayal et al. (Theory of Computing, 2018). This adaptation of the measure is inspired by the complexity measure used by Kayal et al. (SIAM J. Computing, 2017)
Functional lower bounds for arithmetic circuits and connections to boolean circuit complexity
We say that a circuit over a field functionally computes an
-variate polynomial if for every we have that . This is in contrast to syntactically computing , when as
formal polynomials. In this paper, we study the question of proving lower
bounds for homogeneous depth- and depth- arithmetic circuits for
functional computation. We prove the following results :
1. Exponential lower bounds homogeneous depth- arithmetic circuits for a
polynomial in .
2. Exponential lower bounds for homogeneous depth- arithmetic circuits
with bounded individual degree for a polynomial in .
Our main motivation for this line of research comes from our observation that
strong enough functional lower bounds for even very special depth-
arithmetic circuits for the Permanent imply a separation between and
. Thus, improving the second result to get rid of the bounded individual
degree condition could lead to substantial progress in boolean circuit
complexity. Besides, it is known from a recent result of Kumar and Saptharishi
[KS15] that over constant sized finite fields, strong enough average case
functional lower bounds for homogeneous depth- circuits imply
superpolynomial lower bounds for homogeneous depth- circuits.
Our proofs are based on a family of new complexity measures called shifted
evaluation dimension, and might be of independent interest
On the power of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits
We prove exponential lower bounds on the size of homogeneous depth 4
arithmetic circuits computing an explicit polynomial in . Our results hold
for the {\it Iterated Matrix Multiplication} polynomial - in particular we show
that any homogeneous depth 4 circuit computing the entry in the product
of generic matrices of dimension must have size
.
Our results strengthen previous works in two significant ways.
Our lower bounds hold for a polynomial in . Prior to our work, Kayal et
al [KLSS14] proved an exponential lower bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits
(over fields of characteristic zero) computing a poly in . The best known
lower bounds for a depth 4 homogeneous circuit computing a poly in was the
bound of by [LSS, KLSS14].Our exponential lower bounds
also give the first exponential separation between general arithmetic circuits
and homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits. In particular they imply that the
depth reduction results of Koiran [Koi12] and Tavenas [Tav13] are tight even
for reductions to general homogeneous depth 4 circuits (without the restriction
of bounded bottom fanin).
Our lower bound holds over all fields. The lower bound of [KLSS14] worked
only over fields of characteristic zero. Prior to our work, the best lower
bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits over fields of positive characteristic
was [LSS, KLSS14]
Discovering the roots: Uniform closure results for algebraic classes under factoring
Newton iteration (NI) is an almost 350 years old recursive formula that
approximates a simple root of a polynomial quite rapidly. We generalize it to a
matrix recurrence (allRootsNI) that approximates all the roots simultaneously.
In this form, the process yields a better circuit complexity in the case when
the number of roots is small but the multiplicities are exponentially
large. Our method sets up a linear system in unknowns and iteratively
builds the roots as formal power series. For an algebraic circuit
of size we prove that each factor has size at most a
polynomial in: and the degree of the squarefree part of . Consequently,
if is a -hard polynomial then any nonzero multiple
is equally hard for arbitrary positive 's, assuming
that is at most .
It is an old open question whether the class of poly()-sized formulas
(resp. algebraic branching programs) is closed under factoring. We show that
given a polynomial of degree and formula (resp. ABP) size
we can find a similar size formula (resp. ABP) factor in
randomized poly()-time. Consequently, if determinant requires
size formula, then the same can be said about any of its
nonzero multiples.
As part of our proofs, we identify a new property of multivariate polynomial
factorization. We show that under a random linear transformation ,
completely factors via power series roots. Moreover, the
factorization adapts well to circuit complexity analysis. This with allRootsNI
are the techniques that help us make progress towards the old open problems,
supplementing the large body of classical results and concepts in algebraic
circuit factorization (eg. Zassenhaus, J.NT 1969, Kaltofen, STOC 1985-7 \&
Burgisser, FOCS 2001).Comment: 33 Pages, No figure
Hardness vs Randomness for Bounded Depth Arithmetic Circuits
In this paper, we study the question of hardness-randomness tradeoffs for bounded depth arithmetic circuits. We show that if there is a family of explicit polynomials {f_n}, where f_n is of degree O(log^2n/log^2 log n) in n variables such that f_n cannot be computed by a depth Delta arithmetic circuits of size poly(n), then there is a deterministic sub-exponential time algorithm for polynomial identity testing of arithmetic circuits of depth Delta-5.
This is incomparable to a beautiful result of Dvir et al.[SICOMP, 2009], where they showed that super-polynomial lower bounds for depth Delta circuits for any explicit family of polynomials (of potentially high degree) implies sub-exponential time deterministic PIT for depth Delta-5 circuits of bounded individual degree. Thus, we remove the "bounded individual degree" condition in the work of Dvir et al. at the cost of strengthening the hardness assumption to hold for polynomials of low degree.
The key technical ingredient of our proof is the following property of roots of polynomials computable by a bounded depth arithmetic circuit : if f(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) and P(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n, y) are polynomials of degree d and r respectively, such that P can be computed by a circuit of size s and depth Delta and P(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n, f) equiv 0, then, f can be computed by a circuit of size poly(n, s, r, d^{O(sqrt{d})}) and depth Delta + 3. In comparison, Dvir et al. showed that f can be computed by a circuit of depth Delta + 3 and size poly(n, s, r, d^{t}), where t is the degree of P in y. Thus, the size upper bound in the work of Dvir et al. is non-trivial when t is small but d could be large, whereas our size upper bound is non-trivial when d is small, but t could be large
A comparison among four different retrieval methods for ice-cloud properties using data from CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS
The A-Train constellation of satellites provides a new capability to measure vertical cloud profiles that leads to more detailed information on ice-cloud microphysical properties than has been possible up to now. A variational radar–lidar ice-cloud retrieval algorithm (VarCloud) takes advantage of the complementary nature of the CloudSat radar and Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) lidar to provide a seamless retrieval of ice water content, effective radius, and extinction coefficient from the thinnest cirrus (seen only by the lidar) to the thickest ice cloud (penetrated only by the radar). In this paper, several versions of the VarCloud retrieval are compared with the CloudSat standard ice-only retrieval of ice water content, two empirical formulas that derive ice water content from radar reflectivity and temperature, and retrievals of vertically integrated properties from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) radiometer. The retrieved variables typically agree to within a factor of 2, on average, and most of the differences can be explained by the different microphysical assumptions. For example, the ice water content comparison illustrates the sensitivity of the retrievals to assumed ice particle shape. If ice particles are modeled as oblate spheroids rather than spheres for radar scattering then the retrieved ice water content is reduced by on average 50% in clouds with a reflectivity factor larger than 0 dBZ. VarCloud retrieves optical depths that are on average a factor-of-2 lower than those from MODIS, which can be explained by the different assumptions on particle mass and area; if VarCloud mimics the MODIS assumptions then better agreement is found in effective radius and optical depth is overestimated. MODIS predicts the mean vertically integrated ice water content to be around a factor-of-3 lower than that from VarCloud for the same retrievals, however, because the MODIS algorithm assumes that its retrieved effective radius (which is mostly representative of cloud top) is constant throughout the depth of the cloud. These comparisons highlight the need to refine microphysical assumptions in all retrieval algorithms and also for future studies to compare not only the mean values but also the full probability density function
- …