29 research outputs found

    A Genetic Programming Problem Definition Language Code Generator for the EpochX Framework

    Get PDF
    There are many different genetic programming (GP) frameworks that can be used to implement algorithms to solve a particular optimization problem. In order to use a framework, users need to become familiar with a large numbers of source code before actually implementing the algorithm, adding a learning overhead. In some cases, this can prevent users from trying out different frameworks. This paper discusses the implementation of a code generator in the EpochX framework to facilitate the implementation of GP algorithms. The code generator is based on the GP defini- tion language (GPDL), which is a framework-independent language that can be used to specify GP problems

    Event-based graphical monitoring in the EpochX genetic programming framework

    Get PDF
    EpochX is a genetic programming framework with provision for event management – similar to the Java event model – allowing the notification of particular actions during the lifecycle of the evolutionary algorithm. It also provides a flexible Stats system to gather statistics measures. This paper introduces a graphical interface to the EpochX genetic programming framework, taking full advantage of EpochX's event management. A set of representation-independent and tree-dependent GUI components are presented, showing how statistic information can be presented in a rich format using the information provided by EpochX's Stats system

    Online Diversity Control in Symbolic Regression via a Fast Hash-based Tree Similarity Measure

    Full text link
    Diversity represents an important aspect of genetic programming, being directly correlated with search performance. When considered at the genotype level, diversity often requires expensive tree distance measures which have a negative impact on the algorithm's runtime performance. In this work we introduce a fast, hash-based tree distance measure to massively speed-up the calculation of population diversity during the algorithmic run. We combine this measure with the standard GA and the NSGA-II genetic algorithms to steer the search towards higher diversity. We validate the approach on a collection of benchmark problems for symbolic regression where our method consistently outperforms the standard GA as well as NSGA-II configurations with different secondary objectives.Comment: 8 pages, conference, submitted to congress on evolutionary computatio

    Evolutionary Algorithms

    Full text link
    Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are population-based metaheuristics, originally inspired by aspects of natural evolution. Modern varieties incorporate a broad mixture of search mechanisms, and tend to blend inspiration from nature with pragmatic engineering concerns; however, all EAs essentially operate by maintaining a population of potential solutions and in some way artificially 'evolving' that population over time. Particularly well-known categories of EAs include genetic algorithms (GAs), Genetic Programming (GP), and Evolution Strategies (ES). EAs have proven very successful in practical applications, particularly those requiring solutions to combinatorial problems. EAs are highly flexible and can be configured to address any optimization task, without the requirements for reformulation and/or simplification that would be needed for other techniques. However, this flexibility goes hand in hand with a cost: the tailoring of an EA's configuration and parameters, so as to provide robust performance for a given class of tasks, is often a complex and time-consuming process. This tailoring process is one of the many ongoing research areas associated with EAs.Comment: To appear in R. Marti, P. Pardalos, and M. Resende, eds., Handbook of Heuristics, Springe

    Machine Learning Class Numbers of Real Quadratic Fields

    Full text link
    We implement and interpret various supervised learning experiments involving real quadratic fields with class numbers 1, 2 and 3. We quantify the relative difficulties in separating class numbers of matching/different parity from a data-scientific perspective, apply the methodology of feature analysis and principal component analysis, and use symbolic classification to develop machine-learned formulas for class numbers 1, 2 and 3 that apply to our dataset.Comment: 26 pages, 20 figure

    Multi-objective tools for the vehicle routing problem with time windows

    Get PDF
    Most real-life problems involve the simultaneous optimisation of two or more, usually conflicting, objectives. Researchers have put a continuous effort into solving these problems in many different areas, such as engineering, finance and computer science. Over time, thanks to the increase in processing power, researchers have created methods which have become increasingly sophisticated. Most of these methods have been based on the notion of Pareto dominance, which assumes, sometimes erroneously, that the objectives have no known ranking of importance. The Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (VRPTW) is a logistics problem which in real-life applications appears to be multi-objective. This problem consists of designing the optimal set of routes to serve a number of customers within certain time slots. Despite this problem’s high applicability to real-life domains (e.g. waste collection, fast-food delivery), most research in this area has been conducted with hand-made datasets. These datasets sometimes have a number of unrealistic features (e.g. the assumption that one unit of travel time corresponds to one unit of travel distance) and are therefore not adequate for the assessment of optimisers. Furthermore, very few studies have focused on the multi-objective nature of the VRPTW. That is, very few have studied how the optimisation of one objective affects the others. This thesis proposes a number of novel tools (methods + dataset) to address the above- mentioned challenges: 1) an agent-based framework for cooperative search, 2) a novel multi-objective ranking approach, 3) a new dataset for the VRPTW, 4) a study of the pair-wise relationships between five common objectives in VRPTW, and 5) a simplified Multi-objective Discrete Particle Swarm Optimisation for the VRPTW
    corecore