8 research outputs found
The opaque square
The problem of finding small sets that block every line passing through a
unit square was first considered by Mazurkiewicz in 1916. We call such a set
{\em opaque} or a {\em barrier} for the square. The shortest known barrier has
length . The current best lower
bound for the length of a (not necessarily connected) barrier is , as
established by Jones about 50 years ago. No better lower bound is known even if
the barrier is restricted to lie in the square or in its close vicinity. Under
a suitable locality assumption, we replace this lower bound by ,
which represents the first, albeit small, step in a long time toward finding
the length of the shortest barrier. A sharper bound is obtained for interior
barriers: the length of any interior barrier for the unit square is at least . Two of the key elements in our proofs are: (i) formulas established
by Sylvester for the measure of all lines that meet two disjoint planar convex
bodies, and (ii) a procedure for detecting lines that are witness to the
invalidity of a short bogus barrier for the square.Comment: 23 pages, 8 figure
Lower bounds on the dilation of plane spanners
(I) We exhibit a set of 23 points in the plane that has dilation at least
, improving the previously best lower bound of for the
worst-case dilation of plane spanners.
(II) For every integer , there exists an -element point set
such that the degree 3 dilation of denoted by in the domain of plane geometric spanners. In the
same domain, we show that for every integer , there exists a an
-element point set such that the degree 4 dilation of denoted by
The
previous best lower bound of holds for any degree.
(III) For every integer , there exists an -element point set
such that the stretch factor of the greedy triangulation of is at least
.Comment: Revised definitions in the introduction; 23 pages, 15 figures; 2
table
On the geometric dilation of closed curves, graphs, and point sets
The detour between two points u and v (on edges or vertices) of an embedded
planar graph whose edges are curves is the ratio between the shortest path in
in the graph between u and v and their Euclidean distance. The maximum detour
over all pairs of points is called the geometric dilation. Ebbers-Baumann,
Gruene and Klein have shown that every finite point set is contained in a
planar graph whose geometric dilation is at most 1.678, and some point sets
require graphs with dilation at least pi/2 = 1.57... We prove a stronger lower
bound of 1.00000000001*pi/2 by relating graphs with small dilation to a problem
of packing and covering the plane by circular disks.
The proof relies on halving pairs, pairs of points dividing a given closed
curve C in two parts of equal length, and their minimum and maximum distances h
and H. Additionally, we analyze curves of constant halving distance (h=H),
examine the relation of h to other geometric quantities and prove some new
dilation bounds.Comment: 31 pages, 16 figures. The new version is the extended journal
submission; it includes additional material from a conference submission
(ref. [6] in the paper
Algorithmic and Combinatorial Results on Fence Patrolling, Polygon Cutting and Geometric Spanners
The purpose of this dissertation is to study problems that lie at the intersection of geometry and computer science. We have studied and obtained several results from three different areas, namely–geometric spanners, polygon cutting, and fence patrolling. Specifically, we have designed and analyzed algorithms along with various combinatorial results in these three areas. For geometric spanners, we have obtained combinatorial results regarding lower bounds on worst case dilation of plane spanners. We also have studied low degree plane lattice spanners, both square and hexagonal, of low dilation. Next, for polygon cutting, we have designed and analyzed algorithms for cutting out polygon collections drawn on a piece of planar material
using the three geometric models of saw, namely, line, ray and segment cuts. For fence patrolling, we have designed several strategies for robots patrolling both open and closed fences
Geometric Dilation and Halving Distance
Let us consider the network of streets of a city represented by a geometric graph G in the plane. The vertices of G represent the crossroads and the edges represent the streets. The latter do not have to be straight line segments, they may be curved. If one wants to drive from a place p to some other place q, normally the length of the shortest path along streets, d_G(p,q), is bigger than the airline distance (Euclidean distance) |pq|. The (relative) DETOUR is defined as delta_G(p,q) := d_G(p,q)/|pq|. The supremum of all these ratios is called the GEOMETRIC DILATION of G. It measures the quality of the network. A small dilation value guarantees that there is no bigger detour between any two points. Given a finite point set S, we would like to know the smallest possible dilation of any graph that contains the given points on its edges. We call this infimum the DILATION of S and denote it by delta(S). The main results of this thesis are - a general upper bound to the dilation of any finite point set S, delta(S) - a lower bound for a specific set P, delta(P)>(1+10^(-11))pi/2, which approximately equals 1.571 In order to achieve these results, we first consider closed curves. Their dilation depends on the HALVING PAIRS, pairs of points which divide the closed curve in two parts of equal length. In particular the distance between the two points is essential, the HALVING DISTANCE. A transformation technique based on halving pairs, the HALVING PAIR TRANSFORMATION, and the curve formed by the midpoints of the halving pairs, the MIDPOINT CURVE, help us to derive lower bounds to dilation. For constructing graphs of small dilation, we use ZINDLER CURVES. These are closed curves of constant halving distance. To give a structured overview, the mathematical apparatus for deriving the main results of this thesis includes - upper bound: * the construction of certain Zindler curves to generate a periodic graph of small dilation * an embedding argument based on a number theoretical result by Dirichlet - lower bound: * the formulation and analysis of the halving pair transformation * a stability result for the dilation of closed curves based on this transformation and the midpoint curve * the application of a disk-packing result In addition, this thesis contains - a detailed analysis of the dilation of closed curves - a collection of inequalities, which relate halving distance to other important quantities from convex geometry, and their proofs; including four new inequalities - the rediscovery of Zindler curves and a compact presentation of their properties - a proof of the applied disk packing result.Geometrische Dilation und Halbierungsabstand Man kann das von den Straßen einer Stadt gebildete Netzwerk durch einen geometrischen Graphen in der Ebene darstellen. Die Knoten dieses Graphen repräsentieren die Kreuzungen und die Kanten sind die Straßen. Letztere müssen nicht geradlinig sein, sondern können beliebig gekrümmt sein. Wenn man nun von einem Ort p zu einem anderen Ort q fahren möchte, dann ist normalerweise die Länge des kürzesten Pfades über Straßen, d_G(p,q), länger als der Luftlinienabstand (euklidischer Abstand) |pq|. Der (relative) UMWEG (DETOUR) ist definiert als delta_G(p,q) := d_G(p,q)/|pq|. Das Supremum all dieser Brüche wird GEOMETRISCHE DILATION (GEOMETRIC DILATION) von G genannt. Es ist ein Maß für die Qualität des Straßennetzes. Ein kleiner Dilationswert garantiert, dass es keinen größeren Umweg zwischen beliebigen zwei Punkten gibt. Für eine gegebene endliche Punktmenge S würden wir nun gerne bestimmen, was der kleinste Dilationswert ist, den wir mit einem Graphen erreichen können, der die gegebenen Punkte auf seinen Kanten enthält. Dieses Infimum nennen wir die DILATION von S und schreiben kurz delta(S). Die Haupt-Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sind - eine allgemeine obere Schranke für die Dilation jeder beliebigen endlichen Punktmenge S: delta(S) - eine untere Schranke für eine bestimmte Menge P: delta(P)>(1+10^(-11))pi/2, was ungefähr der Zahl 1.571 entspricht Um diese Ergebnisse zu erreichen, betrachten wir zunächst geschlossene Kurven. Ihre Dilation hängt von sogenannten HALBIERUNGSPAAREN (HALVING PAIRS) ab. Das sind Punktpaare, die die geschlossene Kurve in zwei Teile gleicher Länge teilen. Besonders der Abstand der beiden Punkte ist von Bedeutung, der HALBIERUNGSABSTAND (HALVING DISTANCE). Eine auf den Halbierungspaaren aufbauende Transformation, die HALBIERUNGSPAARTRANSFORMATION (HALVING PAIR TRANSFORMATION), und die von den Mittelpunkten der Halbierungspaare gebildete Kurve, die MITTELPUNKTKURVE (MIDPOINT CURVE), helfen uns untere Dilationsschranken herzuleiten. Zur Konstruktion von Graphen mit kleiner Dilation benutzen wir ZINDLERKURVEN (ZINDLER CURVES). Dies sind geschlossene Kurven mit konstantem Halbierungspaarabstand. Die mathematischen Hilfsmittel, mit deren Hilfe wir schließlich die Hauptresultate beweisen, sind unter anderem - obere Schranke: * die Konstruktion von bestimmten Zindlerkurven, mit denen periodische Graphen kleiner Dilation gebildet werden können * ein Einbettungsargument, das einen zahlentheoretischen Satz von Dirichlet benutzt - untere Schranke: * die Definition und Analyse der Halbierungspaartransformation * ein Stabilitätsresultat für die Dilation geschlossener Kurven, das auf dieser Transformation und der Mittelpunktkurve basiert * die Anwendung eines Kreispackungssatzes Zusätzlich enthält diese Dissertation - eine detaillierte Analyse der Dilation geschlossener Kurven - eine Sammlung von Ungleichungen, die den Halbierungsabstand zu anderen wichtigen Größen der Konvexgeometrie in Beziehung setzen, und ihre Beweise; inklusive vier neuer Ungleichungen - die Wiederentdeckung von Zindlerkurven und eine kompakte Darstellung ihrer Eigenschaften - einen Beweis des angewendeten Kreispackungssatzes
On the Geometric Dilation of Finite Point Sets
Let G be an embedded planar graph whose edges may be curves. For two arbitrary points of G, we can compare the length of the shortest path in G connecting them against their Euclidean distance