1,355 research outputs found
Adaptable processes
We propose the concept of adaptable processes as a way of overcoming the
limitations that process calculi have for describing patterns of dynamic
process evolution. Such patterns rely on direct ways of controlling the
behavior and location of running processes, and so they are at the heart of the
adaptation capabilities present in many modern concurrent systems. Adaptable
processes have a location and are sensible to actions of dynamic update at
runtime; this allows to express a wide range of evolvability patterns for
concurrent processes. We introduce a core calculus of adaptable processes and
propose two verification problems for them: bounded and eventual adaptation.
While the former ensures that the number of consecutive erroneous states that
can be traversed during a computation is bound by some given number k, the
latter ensures that if the system enters into a state with errors then a state
without errors will be eventually reached. We study the (un)decidability of
these two problems in several variants of the calculus, which result from
considering dynamic and static topologies of adaptable processes as well as
different evolvability patterns. Rather than a specification language, our
calculus intends to be a basis for investigating the fundamental properties of
evolvable processes and for developing richer languages with evolvability
capabilities
Complexity Hierarchies Beyond Elementary
We introduce a hierarchy of fast-growing complexity classes and show its
suitability for completeness statements of many non elementary problems. This
hierarchy allows the classification of many decision problems with a
non-elementary complexity, which occur naturally in logic, combinatorics,
formal languages, verification, etc., with complexities ranging from simple
towers of exponentials to Ackermannian and beyond.Comment: Version 3 is the published version in TOCT 8(1:3), 2016. I will keep
updating the catalogue of problems from Section 6 in future revision
The Reachability Problem for Petri Nets is Not Elementary
Petri nets, also known as vector addition systems, are a long established
model of concurrency with extensive applications in modelling and analysis of
hardware, software and database systems, as well as chemical, biological and
business processes. The central algorithmic problem for Petri nets is
reachability: whether from the given initial configuration there exists a
sequence of valid execution steps that reaches the given final configuration.
The complexity of the problem has remained unsettled since the 1960s, and it is
one of the most prominent open questions in the theory of verification.
Decidability was proved by Mayr in his seminal STOC 1981 work, and the
currently best published upper bound is non-primitive recursive Ackermannian of
Leroux and Schmitz from LICS 2019. We establish a non-elementary lower bound,
i.e. that the reachability problem needs a tower of exponentials of time and
space. Until this work, the best lower bound has been exponential space, due to
Lipton in 1976. The new lower bound is a major breakthrough for several
reasons. Firstly, it shows that the reachability problem is much harder than
the coverability (i.e., state reachability) problem, which is also ubiquitous
but has been known to be complete for exponential space since the late 1970s.
Secondly, it implies that a plethora of problems from formal languages, logic,
concurrent systems, process calculi and other areas, that are known to admit
reductions from the Petri nets reachability problem, are also not elementary.
Thirdly, it makes obsolete the currently best lower bounds for the reachability
problems for two key extensions of Petri nets: with branching and with a
pushdown stack.Comment: Final version of STOC'1
Recommended from our members
Petri net equivalence
Determining whether two Petri nets are equivalent is an interesting problem from both practical and theoretical standpoints. Although it is undecidable in the general case, for many interesting nets the equivalence problem is solvable. This paper explores, mostly from a theoretical point of view, some of the issues of Petri net equivalence, including both reachability sets and languages. Some new definitions of reachability set equivalence are described which allow the markings of some places to be treated identically or ignored, analogous to the Petri net languages in which multiple transitions may be labeled with the same symbol or with the empty string. The complexity of some decidable Petri net equivalence problems is analyzed
Forward Analysis for WSTS, Part III: Karp-Miller Trees
This paper is a sequel of "Forward Analysis for WSTS, Part I: Completions"
[STACS 2009, LZI Intl. Proc. in Informatics 3, 433-444] and "Forward Analysis
for WSTS, Part II: Complete WSTS" [Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(3),
2012]. In these two papers, we provided a framework to conduct forward
reachability analyses of WSTS, using finite representations of downward-closed
sets. We further develop this framework to obtain a generic Karp-Miller
algorithm for the new class of very-WSTS. This allows us to show that
coverability sets of very-WSTS can be computed as their finite ideal
decompositions. Under natural effectiveness assumptions, we also show that LTL
model checking for very-WSTS is decidable. The termination of our procedure
rests on a new notion of acceleration levels, which we study. We characterize
those domains that allow for only finitely many accelerations, based on ordinal
ranks
Ackermannian and Primitive-Recursive Bounds with Dickson's Lemma
Dickson's Lemma is a simple yet powerful tool widely used in termination
proofs, especially when dealing with counters or related data structures.
However, most computer scientists do not know how to derive complexity upper
bounds from such termination proofs, and the existing literature is not very
helpful in these matters.
We propose a new analysis of the length of bad sequences over (N^k,\leq) and
explain how one may derive complexity upper bounds from termination proofs. Our
upper bounds improve earlier results and are essentially tight
Analysis of Petri Nets with Context-Free Structure Changes
Structure-changing Petri nets are Petri nets with transition replacement rules. In this paper, we investigate the restricted class of structure-changing workflow nets and show that two different reachability properties (concrete and abstract reachability) and word membership in the language of labelled firing sequences are decidable, while a language-based notion of correctness (containment of the language of labelled firing sequences in a regular language) is undecidable
On Functions Weakly Computable by Pushdown Petri Nets and Related Systems
We consider numerical functions weakly computable by grammar-controlled
vector addition systems (GVASes, a variant of pushdown Petri nets). GVASes can
weakly compute all fast growing functions for
, hence they are computationally more powerful than
standard vector addition systems. On the other hand they cannot weakly compute
the inverses or indeed any sublinear function. The proof relies
on a pumping lemma for runs of GVASes that is of independent interest
- …