25,588 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Computer-aided analysis of concurrent systems
The introduction of concurrency into programs has added to the complexity of the software design process. This is most evident in the design of communications protocols where concurrency is inherent to the behavior of the system. The complexity exhibited by such software systems makes more evident the needs for computer-aided tools for automatically analyzing behavior.The Distributed Systems project at UCI has been developing a suite of tools, based on Petri nets, which support the design and evaluation of concurrent software systems. This paper focuses attention on one of the tools: the reachability graph analyzer (RGA). This tool provides mechanisms for proving general system properties (e.g., deadlock-freeness) as well as system-specific properties. The tool is sufficiently general to allow a user to apply complex user-defined analysis algorithms to reachability graphs. The alternating-bit protocol with a bounded channel is used to demonstrate the power of the tool and to point to future extensions
Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview
Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical
formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have
been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous
logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and
complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not
exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic
temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the
notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc.
for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the
temporal logics discussed
Confluence Detection for Transformations of Labelled Transition Systems
The development of complex component software systems can be made more
manageable by first creating an abstract model and then incrementally adding
details. Model transformation is an approach to add such details in a
controlled way. In order for model transformation systems to be useful, it is
crucial that they are confluent, i.e. that when applied on a given model, they
will always produce a unique output model, independent of the order in which
rules of the system are applied on the input. In this work, we consider
Labelled Transition Systems (LTSs) to reason about the semantics of models, and
LTS transformation systems to reason about model transformations. In related
work, the problem of confluence detection has been investigated for general
graph structures. We observe, however, that confluence can be detected more
efficiently in special cases where the graphs have particular structural
properties. In this paper, we present a number of observations to detect
confluence of LTS transformation systems, and propose both a new confluence
detection algorithm and a conflict resolution algorithm based on them.Comment: In Proceedings GaM 2015, arXiv:1504.0244
PLTL Partitioned Model Checking for Reactive Systems under Fairness Assumptions
We are interested in verifying dynamic properties of finite state reactive
systems under fairness assumptions by model checking. The systems we want to
verify are specified through a top-down refinement process. In order to deal
with the state explosion problem, we have proposed in previous works to
partition the reachability graph, and to perform the verification on each part
separately. Moreover, we have defined a class, called Bmod, of dynamic
properties that are verifiable by parts, whatever the partition. We decide if a
property P belongs to Bmod by looking at the form of the Buchi automaton that
accepts the negation of P. However, when a property P belongs to Bmod, the
property f => P, where f is a fairness assumption, does not necessarily belong
to Bmod. In this paper, we propose to use the refinement process in order to
build the parts on which the verification has to be performed. We then show
that with such a partition, if a property P is verifiable by parts and if f is
the expression of the fairness assumptions on a system, then the property f =>
P is still verifiable by parts. This approach is illustrated by its application
to the chip card protocol T=1 using the B engineering design language
Learning to Prove Safety over Parameterised Concurrent Systems (Full Version)
We revisit the classic problem of proving safety over parameterised
concurrent systems, i.e., an infinite family of finite-state concurrent systems
that are represented by some finite (symbolic) means. An example of such an
infinite family is a dining philosopher protocol with any number n of processes
(n being the parameter that defines the infinite family). Regular model
checking is a well-known generic framework for modelling parameterised
concurrent systems, where an infinite set of configurations (resp. transitions)
is represented by a regular set (resp. regular transducer). Although verifying
safety properties in the regular model checking framework is undecidable in
general, many sophisticated semi-algorithms have been developed in the past
fifteen years that can successfully prove safety in many practical instances.
In this paper, we propose a simple solution to synthesise regular inductive
invariants that makes use of Angluin's classic L* algorithm (and its variants).
We provide a termination guarantee when the set of configurations reachable
from a given set of initial configurations is regular. We have tested L*
algorithm on standard (as well as new) examples in regular model checking
including the dining philosopher protocol, the dining cryptographer protocol,
and several mutual exclusion protocols (e.g. Bakery, Burns, Szymanski, and
German). Our experiments show that, despite the simplicity of our solution, it
can perform at least as well as existing semi-algorithms.Comment: Full version of FMCAD'17 pape
- …