1,081 research outputs found
Diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
IntroductionIn the setting of the obesity epidemic, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become one of the most prevalent forms of chronic liver disease worldwide. Approximately 25% of adults globally have NAFLD which includes those with NAFL, or simple steatosis, and individuals with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) where inflammation, hepatocyte injury and potentially hepatic fibrosis are found in conjunction with steatosis. Individuals with NASH, particularly those with hepatic fibrosis, have higher rates of liverârelated and overall mortality, making this distinction of significant clinical importance. One of the core challenges in current clinical practice is identifying this subset of individuals with NASH without the use of liver biopsy, the gold standard for both diagnostics and staging disease severity. Identifying noninvasive biomarkers, an accurately measured and reproducible parameter, would aide in identifying patients eligible for NASH pharmacotherapy clinical trials and to help tailor intensity of monitoring required.Methods, Results and ConclusionsIn this review, we highlight both the currently available and novel diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers under investigation for NASH, underscoring their accuracy and limitations relevant to our patient population and current clinical practice.One of the core challenges in NASH is the ability to accurately diagnose and stage individuals using nonâinvasive methods. In this review, we highlight both the currently available and novel diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers under investigation for NASH, underscoring their accuracy and limitations relevant to our patient population and current clinical practice.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163493/2/edm2177.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163493/1/edm2177_am.pd
Cost-effectiveness of NASH screening
La stĂ©atose hĂ©patique non alcoolique (NAFLD) est la cause dâhĂ©patopathie chronique
la plus frĂ©quente dans les pays occidentaux. Aucune Ă©tude nâa vĂ©rifiĂ© le rapport coĂ»tefficacitĂ©
du dépistage pour la stéatohépatite non-alcoolique (NASH), le stade avancé de la
maladie.
Nous avons réalisé une analyse coût-utilité des stratégies annuelles non invasives de
dĂ©pistage, utilisant une perspective dâun systĂšme de soins canadien, dans la population
gĂ©nĂ©rale et lâavons comparĂ© Ă une population Ă haut risque composĂ©e de patients obĂšses et
diabétiques. Les algorithmes de dépistage incluent des techniques bien étudiées notamment
le «NAFLD fibrosis score», la technique «transient elastography» (TE), et lâimagerie
«acoustic radiation force impulse» (ARFI) pour la détection de la fibrose avancée (℠F3); et
le test «plasma cytokeratin-18» (CK-18) pour la détection de la NASH. La biopsie du foie et
lâĂ©lastographie par rĂ©sonance magnĂ©tique (MRE) ont Ă©tĂ© comparĂ©es comme mĂ©thodes de
confirmation. Les coĂ»ts en dollars canadiens furent corrigĂ©s en fonction de lâinflation et
actualisés à un taux d'actualisation de 5%. Un rapport coût-efficacité différentiel (ICER) de
â€C26,143 par annĂ©e de vie
pondérée par la qualité (QALY) gagnée. Le dépistage annuel dans les populations à haut
risque obĂšses et diabĂ©tiques Ă©tait encore plus coĂ»t-efficace, avec un ICER de C7,991 par QALY gagnĂ©e respectivement. La confirmation avec la biopsie du foie nâĂ©tait
pas coût-efficace.
Notre modĂšle indique que le dĂ©pistage annuel pour la NASH peut ĂȘtre coĂ»t-efficace,
particuliÚrement dans les populations obÚses et diabétiques à haut risque.Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in
Western countries. No studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of screening for
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), its advanced form.
We performed a cost-utility analysis of annual non-invasive screening strategies using
third-party payer perspective in a general population and compared it to screening in a highrisk
obese or diabetic population. Screening algorithms involved well-studied techniques
including NAFLD fibrosis score, transient elastography (TE), and acoustic radiation force
impulse (ARFI) imaging for detecting advanced fibrosis (â„ F3); and plasma cytokeratin-18
for NASH detection. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were
compared as confirmation methods. Canadian dollar costs were adjusted for inflation and
discounted at a 5% rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of â€C26,143 per
quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Screening in high-risk obese or diabetic
populations was more cost-effective, with an ICER of C7,991 per QALY
gained respectively. Liver biopsy confirmation was not found to be cost-effective.
Our model suggests that annual NASH screening can be cost-effective, particularly
in high-risk obese or diabetic populations
Recommended from our members
Biomarkers and subtypes of deranged lipid metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a heterogeneous and complex disease that is imprecisely diagnosed by liver biopsy. NAFLD covers a spectrum that ranges from simple steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with varying degrees of fibrosis, to cirrhosis, which is a major risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma. Lifestyle and eating habit changes during the last century have made NAFLD the most common liver disease linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, with a global prevalence of 25%. NAFLD arises when the uptake of fatty acids (FA) and triglycerides (TG) from circulation and de novo lipogenesis saturate the rate of FA ÎČ-oxidation and very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-TG export. Deranged lipid metabolism is also associated with NAFLD progression from steatosis to NASH, and therefore, alterations in liver and serum lipidomic signatures are good indicators of the disease's development and progression. This review focuses on the importance of the classification of NAFLD patients into different subtypes, corresponding to the main alteration(s) in the major pathways that regulate FA homeostasis leading, in each case, to the initiation and progression of NASH. This concept also supports the targeted intervention as a key approach to maximize therapeutic efficacy and opens the door to the development of precise NASH treatments
Imaging biomarkers for steatohepatitis and fibrosis detection in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
There is a need, in NAFLD management, to develop non-invasive methods to detect steatohepatitis (NASH) and to predict advanced fibrosis stages. We evaluated a tool based on optical analysis of liver magnetic resonance images (MRI) as biomarkers for NASH and fibrosis detection by investigating patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) protocols using 1.5T General Electric (GE) or Philips devices. Two imaging biomarkers (NASHMRI and FibroMRI) were developed, standardised and validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. The results indicated NASHMRI diagnostic accuracy for steatohepatitis detection was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73â0.93) and FibroMRI diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis determination was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77â0.94). These findings were independent of the MR system used. We conclude that optical analysis of MRI has high potential to define non-invasive imaging biomarkers for the detection of steatohepatitis (NASHMRI) and the prediction of significant fibrosis (FibroMRI) in NAFLD patients.ComisiĂłn Europea, 7Âș Programa Marco FP7/2007â2013 HEALTH-F2-2009-241762 Project Fatty Liver Inhibition of Progression (FLIP)Junta de AndalucĂa, ConsejerĂa de Salud PI-0488-2012/201
The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
This guidance provides a data-supported approach to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of NAFLD care. A âGuidanceâ document is different from a âGuideline.â Guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and rate the quality (level) of the evidence and the strength of each recommendation using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A guidance document is developed by a panel of experts in the topic, and guidance statements, not recommendations, are put forward to help clinicians understand and implement the most recent evidence
- âŠ