1,081 research outputs found

    Diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

    Full text link
    IntroductionIn the setting of the obesity epidemic, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become one of the most prevalent forms of chronic liver disease worldwide. Approximately 25% of adults globally have NAFLD which includes those with NAFL, or simple steatosis, and individuals with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) where inflammation, hepatocyte injury and potentially hepatic fibrosis are found in conjunction with steatosis. Individuals with NASH, particularly those with hepatic fibrosis, have higher rates of liver‐related and overall mortality, making this distinction of significant clinical importance. One of the core challenges in current clinical practice is identifying this subset of individuals with NASH without the use of liver biopsy, the gold standard for both diagnostics and staging disease severity. Identifying noninvasive biomarkers, an accurately measured and reproducible parameter, would aide in identifying patients eligible for NASH pharmacotherapy clinical trials and to help tailor intensity of monitoring required.Methods, Results and ConclusionsIn this review, we highlight both the currently available and novel diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers under investigation for NASH, underscoring their accuracy and limitations relevant to our patient population and current clinical practice.One of the core challenges in NASH is the ability to accurately diagnose and stage individuals using non‐invasive methods. In this review, we highlight both the currently available and novel diagnostic and interventional circulating biomarkers under investigation for NASH, underscoring their accuracy and limitations relevant to our patient population and current clinical practice.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163493/2/edm2177.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163493/1/edm2177_am.pd

    Cost-effectiveness of NASH screening

    Full text link
    La stĂ©atose hĂ©patique non alcoolique (NAFLD) est la cause d’hĂ©patopathie chronique la plus frĂ©quente dans les pays occidentaux. Aucune Ă©tude n’a vĂ©rifiĂ© le rapport coĂ»tefficacitĂ© du dĂ©pistage pour la stĂ©atohĂ©patite non-alcoolique (NASH), le stade avancĂ© de la maladie. Nous avons rĂ©alisĂ© une analyse coĂ»t-utilitĂ© des stratĂ©gies annuelles non invasives de dĂ©pistage, utilisant une perspective d’un systĂšme de soins canadien, dans la population gĂ©nĂ©rale et l’avons comparĂ© Ă  une population Ă  haut risque composĂ©e de patients obĂšses et diabĂ©tiques. Les algorithmes de dĂ©pistage incluent des techniques bien Ă©tudiĂ©es notamment le «NAFLD fibrosis score», la technique «transient elastography» (TE), et l’imagerie «acoustic radiation force impulse» (ARFI) pour la dĂ©tection de la fibrose avancĂ©e (≄ F3); et le test «plasma cytokeratin-18» (CK-18) pour la dĂ©tection de la NASH. La biopsie du foie et l’élastographie par rĂ©sonance magnĂ©tique (MRE) ont Ă©tĂ© comparĂ©es comme mĂ©thodes de confirmation. Les coĂ»ts en dollars canadiens furent corrigĂ©s en fonction de l’inflation et actualisĂ©s Ă  un taux d'actualisation de 5%. Un rapport coĂ»t-efficacitĂ© diffĂ©rentiel (ICER) de ≀C50,000/anneˊedeviepondeˊreˊeparlaqualiteˊ(QALY)aeˊteˊconsideˊreˊcommecou^tefficace.Nousavonstrouveˊqueparrapportaˋlastrateˊgiesansdeˊpistageannuel,ledeˊpistageannuelavecl’algorithmeNAFLDfibrosisscore/TE/CK−18etavecMREcommemeˊthodedeconfirmationpourlafibroseavanceˊe,adonneˊunICERdeC50,000 / annĂ©e de vie pondĂ©rĂ©e par la qualitĂ© (QALY) a Ă©tĂ© considĂ©rĂ© comme coĂ»tefficace. Nous avons trouvĂ© que par rapport Ă  la stratĂ©gie sans dĂ©pistage annuel, le dĂ©pistage annuel avec l’algorithme NAFLD fibrosis score/TE/CK-18 et avec MRE comme mĂ©thode de confirmation pour la fibrose avancĂ©e, a donnĂ© un ICER de C26,143 par annĂ©e de vie pondĂ©rĂ©e par la qualitĂ© (QALY) gagnĂ©e. Le dĂ©pistage annuel dans les populations Ă  haut risque obĂšses et diabĂ©tiques Ă©tait encore plus coĂ»t-efficace, avec un ICER de C9,051etC9,051 et C7,991 par QALY gagnĂ©e respectivement. La confirmation avec la biopsie du foie n’était pas coĂ»t-efficace. Notre modĂšle indique que le dĂ©pistage annuel pour la NASH peut ĂȘtre coĂ»t-efficace, particuliĂšrement dans les populations obĂšses et diabĂ©tiques Ă  haut risque.Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in Western countries. No studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), its advanced form. We performed a cost-utility analysis of annual non-invasive screening strategies using third-party payer perspective in a general population and compared it to screening in a highrisk obese or diabetic population. Screening algorithms involved well-studied techniques including NAFLD fibrosis score, transient elastography (TE), and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for detecting advanced fibrosis (≄ F3); and plasma cytokeratin-18 for NASH detection. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were compared as confirmation methods. Canadian dollar costs were adjusted for inflation and discounted at a 5% rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ≀C50,000/qualityadjustedlifeyear(QALY)wasconsideredcost−effective.Comparedwithnoscreening,screeningwithNAFLDfibrosisscore/TE/CK−18algorithmwithMREasconfirmationforadvancedfibrosishadanICERofC50,000 / quality adjusted life year (QALY) was considered cost-effective. Compared with no screening, screening with NAFLD fibrosis score/TE/CK-18 algorithm with MRE as confirmation for advanced fibrosis had an ICER of C26,143 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Screening in high-risk obese or diabetic populations was more cost-effective, with an ICER of C9,051andC9,051 and C7,991 per QALY gained respectively. Liver biopsy confirmation was not found to be cost-effective. Our model suggests that annual NASH screening can be cost-effective, particularly in high-risk obese or diabetic populations

    Imaging biomarkers for steatohepatitis and fibrosis detection in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

    Get PDF
    There is a need, in NAFLD management, to develop non-invasive methods to detect steatohepatitis (NASH) and to predict advanced fibrosis stages. We evaluated a tool based on optical analysis of liver magnetic resonance images (MRI) as biomarkers for NASH and fibrosis detection by investigating patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) protocols using 1.5T General Electric (GE) or Philips devices. Two imaging biomarkers (NASHMRI and FibroMRI) were developed, standardised and validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. The results indicated NASHMRI diagnostic accuracy for steatohepatitis detection was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73–0.93) and FibroMRI diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis determination was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77–0.94). These findings were independent of the MR system used. We conclude that optical analysis of MRI has high potential to define non-invasive imaging biomarkers for the detection of steatohepatitis (NASHMRI) and the prediction of significant fibrosis (FibroMRI) in NAFLD patients.ComisiĂłn Europea, 7Âș Programa Marco FP7/2007–2013 HEALTH-F2-2009-241762 Project Fatty Liver Inhibition of Progression (FLIP)Junta de AndalucĂ­a, ConsejerĂ­a de Salud PI-0488-2012/201

    The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

    Get PDF
    This guidance provides a data-supported approach to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of NAFLD care. A “Guidance” document is different from a “Guideline.” Guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and rate the quality (level) of the evidence and the strength of each recommendation using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A guidance document is developed by a panel of experts in the topic, and guidance statements, not recommendations, are put forward to help clinicians understand and implement the most recent evidence
    • 

    corecore