A tale of two packing problems : improved algorithms and tighter bounds for online bin packing and the geometric knapsack problem

In this thesis, we deal with two packing problems: the online bin packing and the geometric knapsack problem. In online bin packing, the aim is to pack a given number of items of different size into a minimal number of containers. The items need to be packed one by one without knowing future items. For online bin packing in one dimension, we present a new family of algorithms that constitutes the first improvement over the previously best algorithm in almost 15 years. While the algorithmic ideas are intuitive, an elaborate analysis is required to prove its competitive ratio. We also give a lower bound for the competitive ratio of this family of algorithms. For online bin packing in higher dimensions, we discuss lower bounds for the competitive ratio and show that the ideas from the one-dimensional case cannot be easily transferred to obtain better two-dimensional algorithms. In the geometric knapsack problem, one aims to pack a maximum weight subset of given rectangles into one square container. For this problem, we consider online approximation algorithms. For geometric knapsack with square items, we improve the running time of the best known PTAS and obtain an EPTAS. This shows that large running times caused by some standard techniques for geometric packing problems are not always necessary and can be improved. Finally, we show how to use resource augmentation to compute optimal solutions in EPTAS-time, thereby improving upon the known PTAS for this case.In dieser Arbeit betrachten wir zwei Packungsprobleme: Online Bin Packing und das geometrische Rucksackproblem. Bei Online Bin Packing versucht man, eine gegebene Menge an Objekten verschiedener Größe in die kleinstmögliche Anzahl an Behältern zu packen. Die Objekte müssen eins nach dem anderen gepackt werden, ohne zukünftige Objekte zu kennen. Für eindimensionales Online Bin Packing beschreiben wir einen neuen Algorithmus, der die erste Verbesserung gegenüber dem bisher besten Algorithmus seit fast 15 Jahren darstellt. Während die algorithmischen Ideen intuitiv sind, ist eine ausgefeilte Analyse notwendig um das Kompetitivitätsverhältnis zu beweisen. Für Online Bin Packing in mehreren Dimensionen geben wir untere Schranken für das Kompetitivitätsverhältnis an und zeigen, dass die Ideen aus dem eindimensionalen Fall nicht direkt zu einer Verbesserung führen. Beim geometrischen Rucksackproblem ist es das Ziel, eine größtmögliche Teilmenge gegebener Rechtecke in einen einzelnen quadratischen Behälter zu packen. Für dieses Problem betrachten wir Approximationsalgorithmen. Für das Problem mit quadratischen Objekten verbessern wir die Laufzeit des bekannten PTAS zu einem EPTAS. Die langen Laufzeiten vieler Standardtechniken für geometrische Probleme können also vermieden werden. Schließlich zeigen wir, wie Ressourcenvergrößerung genutzt werden kann, um eine optimale Lösung in EPTAS-Zeit zu berechnen, was das bisherige PTAS verbessert.Google PhD Fellowshi

Bin Packing and Related Problems: General Arc-flow Formulation with Graph Compression

We present an exact method, based on an arc-flow formulation with side constraints, for solving bin packing and cutting stock problems --- including multi-constraint variants --- by simply representing all the patterns in a very compact graph. Our method includes a graph compression algorithm that usually reduces the size of the underlying graph substantially without weakening the model. As opposed to our method, which provides strong models, conventional models are usually highly symmetric and provide very weak lower bounds. Our formulation is equivalent to Gilmore and Gomory's, thus providing a very strong linear relaxation. However, instead of using column-generation in an iterative process, the method constructs a graph, where paths from the source to the target node represent every valid packing pattern. The same method, without any problem-specific parameterization, was used to solve a large variety of instances from several different cutting and packing problems. In this paper, we deal with vector packing, graph coloring, bin packing, cutting stock, cardinality constrained bin packing, cutting stock with cutting knife limitation, cutting stock with binary patterns, bin packing with conflicts, and cutting stock with binary patterns and forbidden pairs. We report computational results obtained with many benchmark test data sets, all of them showing a large advantage of this formulation with respect to the traditional ones

Online Bin Stretching with Three Bins

Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin. We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of $11/8 = 1.375$ for three bins. Additionally, we present a lower bound of $45/33 = 1.\overline{36}$ for Online Bin Stretching on three bins and a lower bound of $19/14$ for four and five bins that were discovered using a computer search.Comment: Preprint of a journal version. See version 2 for the conference paper. Conference paper split into two journal submissions; see arXiv:1601.0811

Lower bounds for several online variants of bin packing

We consider several previously studied online variants of bin packing and prove new and improved lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratios for them. For that, we use a method of fully adaptive constructions. In particular, we improve the lower bound for the asymptotic competitive ratio of online square packing significantly, raising it from roughly 1.68 to above 1.75.Comment: WAOA 201