9,922 research outputs found
Stochastic Invariants for Probabilistic Termination
Termination is one of the basic liveness properties, and we study the
termination problem for probabilistic programs with real-valued variables.
Previous works focused on the qualitative problem that asks whether an input
program terminates with probability~1 (almost-sure termination). A powerful
approach for this qualitative problem is the notion of ranking supermartingales
with respect to a given set of invariants. The quantitative problem
(probabilistic termination) asks for bounds on the termination probability. A
fundamental and conceptual drawback of the existing approaches to address
probabilistic termination is that even though the supermartingales consider the
probabilistic behavior of the programs, the invariants are obtained completely
ignoring the probabilistic aspect.
In this work we address the probabilistic termination problem for
linear-arithmetic probabilistic programs with nondeterminism. We define the
notion of {\em stochastic invariants}, which are constraints along with a
probability bound that the constraints hold. We introduce a concept of {\em
repulsing supermartingales}. First, we show that repulsing supermartingales can
be used to obtain bounds on the probability of the stochastic invariants.
Second, we show the effectiveness of repulsing supermartingales in the
following three ways: (1)~With a combination of ranking and repulsing
supermartingales we can compute lower bounds on the probability of termination;
(2)~repulsing supermartingales provide witnesses for refutation of almost-sure
termination; and (3)~with a combination of ranking and repulsing
supermartingales we can establish persistence properties of probabilistic
programs.
We also present results on related computational problems and an experimental
evaluation of our approach on academic examples.Comment: Full version of a paper published at POPL 2017. 20 page
A New Proof Rule for Almost-Sure Termination
An important question for a probabilistic program is whether the probability
mass of all its diverging runs is zero, that is that it terminates "almost
surely". Proving that can be hard, and this paper presents a new method for
doing so; it is expressed in a program logic, and so applies directly to source
code. The programs may contain both probabilistic- and demonic choice, and the
probabilistic choices may depend on the current state.
As do other researchers, we use variant functions (a.k.a.
"super-martingales") that are real-valued and probabilistically might decrease
on each loop iteration; but our key innovation is that the amount as well as
the probability of the decrease are parametric.
We prove the soundness of the new rule, indicate where its applicability goes
beyond existing rules, and explain its connection to classical results on
denumerable (non-demonic) Markov chains.Comment: V1 to appear in PoPL18. This version collects some existing text into
new example subsection 5.5 and adds a new example 5.6 and makes further
remarks about uncountable branching. The new example 5.6 relates to work on
lexicographic termination methods, also to appear in PoPL18 [Agrawal et al,
2018
Algorithmic Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Termination Problems for Affine Probabilistic Programs
In this paper, we consider termination of probabilistic programs with
real-valued variables. The questions concerned are:
1. qualitative ones that ask (i) whether the program terminates with
probability 1 (almost-sure termination) and (ii) whether the expected
termination time is finite (finite termination); 2. quantitative ones that ask
(i) to approximate the expected termination time (expectation problem) and (ii)
to compute a bound B such that the probability to terminate after B steps
decreases exponentially (concentration problem).
To solve these questions, we utilize the notion of ranking supermartingales
which is a powerful approach for proving termination of probabilistic programs.
In detail, we focus on algorithmic synthesis of linear ranking-supermartingales
over affine probabilistic programs (APP's) with both angelic and demonic
non-determinism. An important subclass of APP's is LRAPP which is defined as
the class of all APP's over which a linear ranking-supermartingale exists.
Our main contributions are as follows. Firstly, we show that the membership
problem of LRAPP (i) can be decided in polynomial time for APP's with at most
demonic non-determinism, and (ii) is NP-hard and in PSPACE for APP's with
angelic non-determinism; moreover, the NP-hardness result holds already for
APP's without probability and demonic non-determinism. Secondly, we show that
the concentration problem over LRAPP can be solved in the same complexity as
for the membership problem of LRAPP. Finally, we show that the expectation
problem over LRAPP can be solved in 2EXPTIME and is PSPACE-hard even for APP's
without probability and non-determinism (i.e., deterministic programs). Our
experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to answer
the qualitative and quantitative questions over APP's with at most demonic
non-determinism.Comment: 24 pages, full version to the conference paper on POPL 201
Finding polynomial loop invariants for probabilistic programs
Quantitative loop invariants are an essential element in the verification of
probabilistic programs. Recently, multivariate Lagrange interpolation has been
applied to synthesizing polynomial invariants. In this paper, we propose an
alternative approach. First, we fix a polynomial template as a candidate of a
loop invariant. Using Stengle's Positivstellensatz and a transformation to a
sum-of-squares problem, we find sufficient conditions on the coefficients.
Then, we solve a semidefinite programming feasibility problem to synthesize the
loop invariants. If the semidefinite program is unfeasible, we backtrack after
increasing the degree of the template. Our approach is semi-complete in the
sense that it will always lead us to a feasible solution if one exists and
numerical errors are small. Experimental results show the efficiency of our
approach.Comment: accompanies an ATVA 2017 submissio
On the Termination Problem for Probabilistic Higher-Order Recursive Programs
In the last two decades, there has been much progress on model checking of
both probabilistic systems and higher-order programs. In spite of the emergence
of higher-order probabilistic programming languages, not much has been done to
combine those two approaches. In this paper, we initiate a study on the
probabilistic higher-order model checking problem, by giving some first
theoretical and experimental results. As a first step towards our goal, we
introduce PHORS, a probabilistic extension of higher-order recursion schemes
(HORS), as a model of probabilistic higher-order programs. The model of PHORS
may alternatively be viewed as a higher-order extension of recursive Markov
chains. We then investigate the probabilistic termination problem -- or,
equivalently, the probabilistic reachability problem. We prove that almost sure
termination of order-2 PHORS is undecidable. We also provide a fixpoint
characterization of the termination probability of PHORS, and develop a sound
(but possibly incomplete) procedure for approximately computing the termination
probability. We have implemented the procedure for order-2 PHORSs, and
confirmed that the procedure works well through preliminary experiments that
are reported at the end of the article
Liveness of Randomised Parameterised Systems under Arbitrary Schedulers (Technical Report)
We consider the problem of verifying liveness for systems with a finite, but
unbounded, number of processes, commonly known as parameterised systems.
Typical examples of such systems include distributed protocols (e.g. for the
dining philosopher problem). Unlike the case of verifying safety, proving
liveness is still considered extremely challenging, especially in the presence
of randomness in the system. In this paper we consider liveness under arbitrary
(including unfair) schedulers, which is often considered a desirable property
in the literature of self-stabilising systems. We introduce an automatic method
of proving liveness for randomised parameterised systems under arbitrary
schedulers. Viewing liveness as a two-player reachability game (between
Scheduler and Process), our method is a CEGAR approach that synthesises a
progress relation for Process that can be symbolically represented as a
finite-state automaton. The method is incremental and exploits both
Angluin-style L*-learning and SAT-solvers. Our experiments show that our
algorithm is able to prove liveness automatically for well-known randomised
distributed protocols, including Lehmann-Rabin Randomised Dining Philosopher
Protocol and randomised self-stabilising protocols (such as the Israeli-Jalfon
Protocol). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully-automatic
method that can prove liveness for randomised protocols.Comment: Full version of CAV'16 pape
- …