Low-frequency oscillatory correlates of auditory predictive processing in cortical-subcortical networks: a MEG-study

Emerging evidence supports the role of neural oscillations as a mechanism for predictive information processing across large-scale networks. However, the oscillatory signatures underlying auditory mismatch detection and information flow between brain regions remain unclear. To address this issue, we examined the contribution of oscillatory activity at theta/alpha-bands (4–8/8–13 Hz) and assessed directed connectivity in magnetoencephalographic data while 17 human participants were presented with sound sequences containing predictable repetitions and order manipulations that elicited prediction-error responses. We characterized the spectro-temporal properties of neural generators using a minimum-norm approach and assessed directed connectivity using Granger Causality analysis. Mismatching sequences elicited increased theta power and phase-locking in auditory, hippocampal and prefrontal cortices, suggesting that theta-band oscillations underlie prediction-error generation in cortical-subcortical networks. Furthermore, enhanced feedforward theta/alpha-band connectivity was observed in auditory-prefrontal networks during mismatching sequences, while increased feedback connectivity in the alpha-band was observed between hippocampus and auditory regions during predictable sounds. Our findings highlight the involvement of hippocampal theta/alpha-band oscillations towards auditory prediction-error generation and suggest a spectral dissociation between inter-areal feedforward vs. feedback signalling, thus providing novel insights into the oscillatory mechanisms underlying auditory predictive processing

Test-retest reliability of the magnetic mismatch negativity response to sound duration and omission deviants

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a neurophysiological measure of auditory novelty detection that could serve as a translational biomarker of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, the replicability of its magnetoencephalographic (MEG) counterpart (MMNm) has been insufficiently addressed. In the current study, test-retest reliability of the MMNm response to both duration and omission deviants was evaluated over two MEG sessions in 16 healthy adults. MMNm amplitudes and latencies were obtained at both sensor- and source-level using a cortically-constrained minimum-norm approach. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were derived to assess stability of MEG responses over time. In addition, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and within-subject statistics were obtained in order to determine MMNm detectability in individual participants. ICC revealed robust values at both sensor- and source-level for both duration and omission MMNm amplitudes (ICC = 0.81-0.90), in particular in the right hemisphere, while moderate to strong values were obtained for duration MMNm and omission MMNm peak latencies (ICC = 0.74-0.88). Duration MMNm was robustly identified in individual participants with high SNR, whereas omission MMNm responses were only observed in half of the participants. Our data indicate that MMNm to unexpected duration changes and omitted sounds are highly reproducible, providing support for the use of MEG-parameters in basic and clinical research

Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Despite similar behavioral effects, attention and expectation influence evoked responses differently: Attention typically enhances event-related responses, whereas expectation reduces them. This dissociation has been reconciled under predictive coding, where prediction errors are weighted by precision associated with attentional modulation. Here, we tested the predictive coding account of attention and expectation using magnetoencephalography and modeling. Temporal attention and sensory expectation were orthogonally manipulated in an auditory mismatch paradigm, revealing opposing effects on evoked response amplitude. Mismatch negativity (MMN) was enhanced by attention, speaking against its supposedly pre-attentive nature. This interaction effect was modeled in a canonical microcircuit using dynamic causal modeling, comparing models with modulation of extrinsic and intrinsic connectivity at different levels of the auditory hierarchy. While MMN was explained by recursive interplay of sensory predictions and prediction errors, attention was linked to the gain of inhibitory interneurons, consistent with its modulation of sensory precision

Atypical prediction error learning is associated with prodromal symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis

Reductions in the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) have been well-demonstrated in schizophrenia rendering it a promising biomarker for understanding the emergence of psychosis. According to the predictive coding theory of psychosis, MMN impairments may reflect disturbances in hierarchical information processing driven by maladaptive precision-weighted prediction errors (pwPEs) and enhanced belief updating. We applied a hierarchical Bayesian model of learning to single-trial EEG data from an auditory oddball paradigm in 31 help-seeking antipsychotic-naive high-risk individuals and 23 healthy controls to understand the computational mechanisms underlying the auditory MMN. We found that low-level sensory and high-level volatility pwPE expression correlated with EEG amplitudes, coinciding with the timing of the MMN. Furthermore, we found that prodromal positive symptom severity was associated with increased expression of sensory pwPEs and higher-level belief uncertainty. Our findings provide support for the role of pwPEs in auditory MMN generation, and suggest that increased sensory pwPEs driven by changes in belief uncertainty may render the environment seemingly unpredictable. This may predispose high-risk individuals to delusion-like ideation to explain this experience. These results highlight the value of computational models for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of psychosis

A dual role for prediction error in associative learning

Confronted with a rich sensory environment, the brain must learn statistical regularities across sensory domains to construct causal models of the world. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to furnish neurophysiological evidence that statistical associations are learnt, even when task-irrelevant. Subjects performed an audio-visual target-detection task while being exposed to distractor stimuli. Unknown to them, auditory distractors predicted the presence or absence of subsequent visual distractors. We modeled incidental learning of these associations using a Rescorla--Wagner (RW) model. Activity in primary visual cortex and putamen reflected learning-dependent surprise: these areas responded progressively more to unpredicted, and progressively less to predicted visual stimuli. Critically, this prediction-error response was observed even when the absence of a visual stimulus was surprising. We investigated the underlying mechanism by embedding the RW model into a DCM to show that auditory to visual connectivity changed significantly over time as a function of prediction error. Thus, consistent with predictive coding models of perception, associative learning is mediated by prediction-error dependent changes in connectivity. These results posit a dual role for prediction-error in encoding surprise and driving associative plasticity

Mismatch task conditions and error related ERPs

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The N200 component of event related potentials (ERPs) is considered an index of monitoring error related responses. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of mismatch conditions on the subjects' responses in an auditory identification task and their relation to the N200 of stimulus-locked ERPs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An auditory identification task required to correctly map a horizontal slider onto an active frequency range by selecting a slider position that matched the stimulus tone in each trial. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the study and ERPs were recorded by 32 leads.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results showed that the subjects' erroneous responses were equally distributed within trials, but were dependent on mismatch conditions, generated by large differences between the frequencies of the tones of consecutive trials. Erroneous trials showed a significantly greater negativity within the time window of 164-191 ms after stimulus, located mainly at the Cz and Fz electrodes. The LORETA solution showed that maximum activations, as well as maximum differences, were localized mainly at the frontal lobe.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings suggest that the fronto-central N200 component, conceived an index of "reorientation of attention", represents a correlate of an error signal, being produced when representation of the actual response and the required response are compared. Furthermore the magnitude of the amplitude of the N200 rests on the relation between the present and the previous stimulus.</p

Repetition suppression and its contextual determinants in predictive coding

This paper presents a review of theoretical and empirical work on repetition suppression in the context of predictive coding. Predictive coding is a neurobiologically plausible scheme explaining how biological systems might perform perceptual inference and learning. From this perspective, repetition suppression is a manifestation of minimising prediction error through adaptive changes in predictions about the content and precision of sensory inputs. Simulations of artificial neural hierarchies provide a principled way of understanding how repetition suppression - at different time scales - can be explained in terms of inference and learning implemented under predictive coding. This formulation of repetition suppression is supported by results of numerous empirical studies of repetition suppression and its contextual determinants

The brain as a generative model: information-theoretic surprise in learning and action

Our environment is rich with statistical regularities, such as a sudden cold gust of wind indicating a potential change in weather. A combination of theoretical work and empirical evidence suggests that humans embed this information in an internal representation of the world. This generative model is used to perform probabilistic inference, which may be approximated through surprise minimization. This process rests on current beliefs enabling predictions, with expectation violation amounting to surprise. Through repeated interaction with the world, beliefs become more accurate and grow more certain over time. Perception and learning may be accounted for by minimizing surprise of current observations, while action is proposed to minimize expected surprise of future events. This framework thus shows promise as a common formulation for different brain functions. The work presented here adopts information-theoretic quantities of surprise to investigate both perceptual learning and action. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) of participants in a somatosensory roving-stimulus paradigm and performed trial-by-trial modeling of cortical dynamics. Bayesian model selection suggests early processing in somatosensory cortices to encode confidence-corrected surprise and subsequently Bayesian surprise. This suggests the somatosensory system to signal surprise of observations and update a probabilistic model learning transition probabilities. We also extended this framework to include audition and vision in a multi-modal roving-stimulus study. Next, we studied action by investigating a sensitivity to expected Bayesian surprise. Interestingly, this quantity is also known as information gain and arises as an incentive to reduce uncertainty in the active inference framework, which can correspond to surprise minimization. In comparing active inference to a classical reinforcement learning model on the two-step decision-making task, we provided initial evidence for active inference to better account for human model-based behaviour. This appeared to relate to participants’ sensitivity to expected Bayesian surprise and contributed to explaining exploration behaviour not accounted for by the reinforcement learning model. Overall, our findings provide evidence for information-theoretic surprise as a model for perceptual learning signals while also guiding human action.Unsere Umwelt ist reich an statistischen Regelmäßigkeiten, wie z. B. ein plötzlicher kalter Windstoß, der einen möglichen Wetterumschwung ankündigt. Eine Kombination aus theoretischen Arbeiten und empirischen Erkenntnissen legt nahe, dass der Mensch diese Informationen in eine interne Darstellung der Welt einbettet. Dieses generative Modell wird verwendet, um probabilistische Inferenz durchzuführen, die durch Minimierung von Überraschungen angenähert werden kann. Der Prozess beruht auf aktuellen Annahmen, die Vorhersagen ermöglichen, wobei eine Verletzung der Erwartungen einer Überraschung gleichkommt. Durch wiederholte Interaktion mit der Welt nehmen die Annahmen mit der Zeit an Genauigkeit und Gewissheit zu. Es wird angenommen, dass Wahrnehmung und Lernen durch die Minimierung von Überraschungen bei aktuellen Beobachtungen erklärt werden können, während Handlung erwartete Überraschungen für zukünftige Beobachtungen minimiert. Dieser Rahmen ist daher als gemeinsame Bezeichnung für verschiedene Gehirnfunktionen vielversprechend. In der hier vorgestellten Arbeit werden informationstheoretische Größen der Überraschung verwendet, um sowohl Wahrnehmungslernen als auch Handeln zu untersuchen. Wir haben die Elektroenzephalographie (EEG) von Teilnehmern in einem somatosensorischen Paradigma aufgezeichnet und eine trial-by-trial Modellierung der kortikalen Dynamik durchgeführt. Die Bayes'sche Modellauswahl deutet darauf hin, dass frühe Verarbeitung in den somatosensorischen Kortizes confidence corrected surprise und Bayesian surprise kodiert. Dies legt nahe, dass das somatosensorische System die Überraschung über Beobachtungen signalisiert und ein probabilistisches Modell aktualisiert, welches wiederum Wahrscheinlichkeiten in Bezug auf Übergänge zwischen Reizen lernt. In einer weiteren multimodalen Roving-Stimulus-Studie haben wir diesen Rahmen auch auf die auditorische und visuelle Modalität ausgeweitet. Als Nächstes untersuchten wir Handlungen, indem wir die Empfindlichkeit gegenüber der erwarteten Bayesian surprise betrachteten. Interessanterweise ist diese informationstheoretische Größe auch als Informationsgewinn bekannt und stellt, im Rahmen von active inference, einen Anreiz dar, Unsicherheit zu reduzieren. Dies wiederum kann einer Minimierung der Überraschung entsprechen. Durch den Vergleich von active inference mit einem klassischen Modell des Verstärkungslernens (reinforcement learning) bei der zweistufigen Entscheidungsaufgabe konnten wir erste Belege dafür liefern, dass active inference menschliches modellbasiertes Verhalten besser abbildet. Dies scheint mit der Sensibilität der Teilnehmer gegenüber der erwarteten Bayesian surprise zusammenzuhängen und trägt zur Erklärung des Explorationsverhaltens bei, das jedoch nicht vom reinforcement learning-Modell erklärt werden kann. Insgesamt liefern unsere Ergebnisse Hinweise für Formulierungen der informationstheoretischen Überraschung als Modell für Signale wahrnehmungsbasierten Lernens, die auch menschliches Handeln steuern

Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function

The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) has been proposed as a biomarker of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction in schizophrenia. Such dysfunction may be caused by aberrant interactions of different neuromodulators with NMDARs, which could explain clinical heterogeneity among patients. In two studies (N = 81 each), we used a double-blind placebo-controlled between-subject design to systematically test whether auditory mismatch responses under varying levels of environmental stability are sensitive to diminishing and enhancing cholinergic vs. dopaminergic function. We found a significant drug × mismatch interaction: while the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist biperiden delayed and topographically shifted mismatch responses, particularly during high stability, this effect could not be detected for amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist. Neither galantamine nor levodopa, which elevate acetylcholine and dopamine levels, respectively, exerted significant effects on MMN. This differential MMN sensitivity to muscarinic versus dopaminergic receptor function may prove useful for developing tests that predict individual treatment responses in schizophrenia